Theme: Institution

The Solution To the Problem of Our Age Requires We Address A Taboo.

THE PROBLEM All institutions lag. Of law (market), state (commons), and religion (tradition), law evolves fastest. But even so, law that is dependent upon tradition, even an empirical tradition, and lacking formal logical foundation, cannot reform without crisis – any more than familes, social organizations, commerical organiztins, the sciences, governments, or religions reform without crisis And we are in civilizational Crisis for just this reason: our law is lagging in reform. The failure of the law of tort to keep pace with inventions in parasitism and predation generates demand for the state to via-positiva impose rules of conduct instead of the law’s via-negativa prohibitions on conduct. The objective of my work the reformation of our traditional, empirical, evolutionary, common law and its foundation in the law of tort, and dependence upon the test of reciprocity into a strictly constructed, formal, operational logic like that of programming. Computers cannot choose and have no instincts of their own, so we program them with what they must do given the operations it is possible for them to perform. Conversely, man can choose and has instincts of his own, we must program man with what they must not do, given the operations it is possible for mankind to perform. If we are successful in evolving norms, we program man by training and environmental exposure with the positive alternatives to those actions we wish to program him not to perform. It is always better to reward the man for doing a good than threaten a man with consequences for doing a bad.  And while we adapt our norms to encourage different alternatives to the bad, we have evolved the habit of expressly prohibiting the bad, and codifying those prohibitions in law, and using institutions to enforce those prohibitions.  These laws convert social norms by which one can be ostracized to institutional ways by which one can be punished for doing bads. Where that law of Tort (or Trespass, or Property), is dependent upon the logical necessity and empirical evidence of the universal human demand for Reciprocity, and that tests of reciprocity provide man with universal decidability in matters of conflict. And where that demand for Reciprocity includes every action or inaction, and all display, word and deed. That means reciprocity in everything we can pay any cost for, directly or indirectly, by action or inaction, whether private, shared, or commons. And While reciprocity-in-deed is ancient and obvious, the novelty in my work is  ( …. scope and speech and display ) in demanding Reciprocity in word, that requires testifiable, warrantable claims for which one is liable. This requirement causes us to pay an even greater self-monitoring cost (what we call agency) than does reciprocity-in-deed. And this has been a problem. We have tolerated free speech when we meant truthful, reciprocal, moral, and constructive speech. science invent techniques of observation (measurement) and logic (measurement), that exhaust our … So when I say that my work in Propertarianism’s P-Logic, and P-Law complete the scientific method, I mean, that the scientific method evolved from, and is an application of, our law of evidentiary testimony, by extending the logic of tort from claims over property disputes, to all claims about the universe,  ( … suppressing all false claims not just false claims over  …) And that P-Logic and P-Law extend the prohibition on the spectrum of techniques of deception: of Laziness in failure of due diligence against error and bias; undue influence by loading and framing, suggestion and obscurantism,; deception by the three fictionalisms of verbal sophistry-to-idealism, physical magic-to pseudoscience, and imaginary occult to supernaturalism; and outright deceit by false promise, fraud, baiting into hazard. THOUGHT LEADERSHIP As strange as it might seem, there are only two groups of thought leaders in this present world, the Europeans and the Half European Jews we call Ashkenazi. And the Europeans and the Askenazi have polar opposite genetic intuitions, cultural strategies, civilizational ambitions, and designs for man. And to not surprisingly these strategies are as opposite as the male and female reproductive strategies that these civilizations institutionalized as their group strategies – because that is the underlying difference between these group strategies: European Masculine superpredation by military, political, and economic construction, and Semitic Feminine superpredation by social and moral construction to resist it. Why? The difference between male meritocracy producing eugenics, and female equalitarianism producing dysgenics. That’s the underlying conflict between male and female strategies, that is only mitigated by parenthood and monogamy with enough children to unite sex differences in cognition. Or to put in more common terms, the instinct for men to join in a loyal hierarchy, and the instinct of women to preserve ease of manipulation by words and emotions (infantilism) – both instincts are demonstrated as overwhelmingly in the literature as they are by common experience. ( … TITLE … ) While the Aristotelian restoration caused the middle class to re-harmonized common law and rule of law in opposition to (corrupt) church thought and resulted in the anglo empirical restoration, beginning with the “enlightenment”: the French, then German, then Jewish, now Islamic and Chinese counter-revolutions against the anglo empirical, agrarian, financial, commercial, industrial, Darwinian, Scientific, and german second-scientific revolutions, only the Jewish revolution has been successful in surviving:  Boaz-Freud-Marx-Lenin-Stalin, Cantor-Bohr, Gramsci-Frankfurt-Neomarxism, and Derrida-Friedan and the postmodernists, Mises-Rand-Rothbard and the libertarians, and the neoconservatives. This Almost exclusively Jewish counter-revolution is reducible to a revolt against Darwin, and Darwin’s implied explanatin for the success of western civilization, Nietzche’s restoration of european ethics, and the opportunity created by the failure of the church to either follow the orthodoxy into ritual, nationalism, and morals of the family, or modernize by completing the natural law project thus retaining the church’s position as a judicial authority over european civilization. Instead they tried to maintain the Augustine and Aquinas attempt to keep the church’s superstition out of direct competition with Aristotelian reason. Ths counter revolution repeats the same technique as the destruction of Roman civlization, it’s arts, letters, philosophy, wisdome, and technology from within by jewish insurrectionists that today we call Christians. But instead of a false promises of life after death, extension of familial love to non-kin, pretense of moral high ground, status from pretense of moral high ground, and freedom from social stimatism of inferiority to the aristocratic classes, in the modern world, the Marxists, Neo Marxists, Postmodernists, anti-male feminists, and human biodiversity science deniers, offer freedom from physical lawas of scarcity, natural laws of self interest and reciprocity, and evolutionary laws of the amorality of man, the domesticatin of man, and regression to the mean, if the evil european males are overthrown and another equalitarian age replaces it – which of course, will require additional false promises until the people have forgotten the meaning of truth itself. In the face of this predominantly jewish counter-revolution against wesetern civlization, the aristocracy, and the nobility, and the classes of the able, have held to their christian faith that the common folk would continue to suppress their wants and impulses, and retain their piety and civility and adherence to tradition despite the new plenty that gave them license. But this project we call democracy and mass consumption in order to defeat communism, failed. Worse, western man’s canon is distributed across hundreds of tomes across hundreds of decades, and as such was practiced as a tradition but not written down in consolidated form accessible to the masses until quite possibly the American constitution – for reasons I’ll explain further in this work.  Yet we are faced with the rather obvious evidence of the superiority of western civilization at least since the Romans and Greeks, if not yet sure about the Aryans, but we have failed to preserve it with religion, we have failed to preserve it with philosophy, and we seem to have only preserved it with the military, juridical government, the family, and our juridical law: traditions rather than persuasions or religions.  Although all four, in addition to our knowledge of history, have been under attack by the Jewish left, and that third of our population who are willing accomplices, for fourscore and ten years – to borrow a phrase. And the Jewish left and their willing accomplices, in particular, single women, less developed immigrants, and now Islamists – the same people who brought Christianity to Roman civilization and gave us the dark ages rather than roman restoration, and destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world, So over the past decades as our civilization crumbles from insurrection within, despite postwar suppression by the Jewish left, we’ve seen scientists attempt to rescue our civilization by providing the answers that we ourselves have failed to write down as canon: why did Europeans outperform all other peoples in this world combined, in just a few centuries in the Aryan expansion, a few centuries in the ancient world, and a few centuries in the modern world – and why were the dark ages dark, and why didn’t we have the industrial revolution by within a few hundred years after Aristotle? Thanks to the combination of computers, science, cognitive science – meaning neurology,  and genetics, we know some of the answers, but I’m going to try to provide the rest, as well as how to restore our civilization despite the repeated counter-revolutions against it which seek to destroy our civilization once again.

—“Western cultural uniqueness originates from two powerful currents—aristocratic individualism resulting from the Indo-European settlement beginning around 2500 BC, and egalitarian individualism originating from the primordial Northern hunter-gatherers that populated Europe since before the Ice Ages. This article describes the origins and culture of the Indo-Europeans.”– Kevin Macdonald

A look at the literature contains two major arguments: Genetic, cultural, and philosophical. I’m going to do what behavioral economists do, and examine the incentives given the genetic, geographic, demographic, adversarial, institutional, scientific, and technological, differences between peoples and cultures – and treat literature, including philosophy, as largely post-hoc justification. It’s justification for the seizure of incentives that already exist. It’s the incentives that are causal – and not open to the various loadings, framings, obscurantisms and deceits humans so commonly commit to prose. My only substantive improvement on Macdonald and Duchesne will be an explanation of the incentives and resulting institutions and a minor improvement on genetics and cognitive science that have evolved over the past few years. And in doing so we’ll create a coherent and complete story of the evolution of western civilization and why it’s unique, produces excellence, is unrepeatable, and irreplaceable whether genetic, conceptual or institutional – because it’s all three. All intellectuals work from a primary frame. My frame is cognitive science, behavioral economics, methods of argument (language), institutions, and group strategy. This is a ‘constructivist’, ‘operational’, ‘causal’ frame.

Thesis:

Neotenic Self Domestication

1-There are three human (H.Sapiens) races (subspecies). These subspecies adapted geographically. Their direction of adaptation is neotenic. Neoteny allows agency (cognitive adaptability), permitting the sequential social, linguistic (cognitive), and technical revolutions. 1 – The primary difference between human groups is the degree of neoteny. Neoteny preserves opportunity for developmental growth allowing for the development of the increasing agency. Neoteny is the product of selection for cooperation. intelligence is a byproduct of selecting for cooperation producing neoteny. 2-The climate in Africa and the population distribution resisted neotenic evolution. The climate in west Eurasia and distribution accelerated neotenic evolution. The climate in east Asian and limited distribution acclerated neotenic evolution. Groups speciated further. 3-The Agrarian revolution was a significant caloric advantage but homogenized populations. The cline in Asia was southward and beneficial, but in Eurasia was north and regressive. The Steppe revolution was a significant cultural advantage and homogenized populations(IE). 4-The manorial revolutions in northern Europe and northern China were a significant political revolution, restoring natural selection under agrarianism. The industrial revolution provided expansion but reversed natural (Neotenic) selection and was regressive. 5-The evolution of man is the story of the neotenic self-domestication of man, and the subsequent domestication of territories, plants, animals, metals, chemistry and now physical properties.

Human Groups

2 – Some groups have been the victim of circumstance that favored neotenic evolution. Some groups institutionalized neotenic evolution (eugenics) by accident. Some groups institutionalize neotenic evolution by design (eugenics). 3 – Class structures are the natural result of the competition between neotenic development, genetic load, health, and environment, with measurable consequences we call biological symmetry, absence of neuroticism(calm), conscientiousness, and intelligence. Class is the term we use for the spectrum of sexual, social, economic, political, military, and strategic market value. 4 – Any group that institutionalizes neotenic evolution (eugenics) will benefit from the fact that eugenics are the single most influential and desirable factor determining group quality of material life. Dysgenics are the single most desirable factor opposing material life in exchange for psychological life. Markets are naturally eugenic. Religion is the opposite.  And serves largely to sedate us against evolutionary pressures as populations increase and with it, anonymity, irrelevance, and alienation. 5 – The second most influential difference between groups is the order of institutions. Europeans, for entirely environmental reasons, were the only people to develop Law – meaning the natural law(under our control) of tort (consisting of self-determination, sovereignty, property, and reciprocity) as their first social and political institution, instead of religion (out of our control) or state (under their control). And law is a purely empirical means of social organization. As we shall see, the order of institutional development like any evolutionary process creates evolutionary dependencies, that determine the future of civilizations.  (See: Path Dependence) Law is the least evolutionarily contradictory political institution. Just as commerce is the least evolutionarily contradictory social order. Just as the Military is the least evolutionarily contradictory extra-political order. Just as science (Testimony) is the least evolutionarily contradictory intellectual order. 6 – The third most influential difference between groups is their ‘metaphysics’ or set of ‘paradigms’. Europeans, and specifically European aristocratic (Ruling) classes, for those entirely environmental reasons, and having developed empirical law as their first institution were alone the only people to discover, adapt to, and apply the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe. Despite the extraordinary high psychological cost of doing so. And the one cost East Asians alone would bear as well: the suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses and the direction of the surpluses to the production of commons. And in doing so dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, early mortality, in just a few centuries in the early bronze age, a few centuries in the ancient world, and a few centuries in the modern world – while the middle east stagnated then declined in dysgenia, the Indians were unable to transform the continent, the Chinese, luckily isolated from the middle east succeeded then stagnated, leaving Europeans as the only people to succeed in the transition out of victimization by nature, and the universe, and instead to domesticate it. 7 – The fourth most influential difference between groups is their evolutionary strategy. ( … ) group strategies 6-The standard of living of civilizations is (was until 1950) a measure of the DENIAL of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, with the Europeans practicing the LEAST denial. 7 – If people have not passed thru sufficient neotenic domestication to survive by natural selection in markets(in the absence of immigration) then they are unfit for western civilization the entire structure of which is evolutionary.

Hostilities

8-The Left-Jewish-Islamist counter-revolution is DEVOLUTIONARY resistance to market domestication. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, Islam to reverse evolution. At present only China and the Slavs have the political system and will to resist devolution. 7 – Devolutionary Revolt: Both the Abrahamic Counter Revolutions of Christianity, Rabbinical Judaism, and Islam in the ancient world, and the Abrahamic counter-revolutions of Marxism, Bolshevism, Socialism, Postmodernism, Anti-Male Feminism, Human Difference Science Denialism, Political Correctness, and Anti-Westernism in the modern world, are revolts against the natural eugenics of the Aristocratic (European, Persian) peoples. The Abrahamic counter-revolution against the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, proposes the opposite circumstance: the expansion of the underclasses, and the deprivation of the commons, and a parasitic elite that benefits from capturing mankind in stagnation and decline. 8 – Just as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam brought about the first Abrahamic dark age of ignorance superstition, dysgenia, destruction, and eventual decline, the second Abrahamic dark age is in progress using the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and with the same results as every other civilization affected by Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: devolution by dysgenia and decline. 9 – Every group develops a strategy, mythology, paradigm (metaphysics), methodology of persuasion, and perpetuates it across generations. We are unconscious of these differences. But just as we can be universally taught logic, mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, and economics, we can be taught how to speak truthfully, how to identify lies and frauds, and how to find mindfulness in truth and community rather than falsehood and deceits. 10 – It is possible to use common law of tort to prevent false promises in psychological, social, economic, and political fraud( informational) just as we prevent it in commercial (advertising, marketing, sales). And it is possible to institutionalize the suppression of that specific kind of fraud (baiting into hazard) just as we institutionalize the suppression of other kinds of baiting into hazard at the interpersonal scale (drugs, prostitution, crime, etc. 11 – It is possible to prevent another dark age, and possible to prevent the civil war that many of us are determined to wage to prevent that dark age if we cannot prevent it by more agreeable political means: peaceful separation, and restoration of the process of speciation.

The European Method of Truth

Understanding

—“ A wisdom literature provides advice for decisions and choices within the limits of a group’s evolutionary strategy within a group using that evolutionary strategy. A Theology provides an authoritarian wisdom literature, by false promise and false threat, conflating wisdom and law between competing group evolutionary strategies. An ideology serves to inspire individuals to action under democracy. A philosophy provides methods of choice in order to achieve a desired state of affairs. A formal logic provides language and grammar for the testing (falsification) of the internal consistency of verbal relations. A science provides a formal process(logical and physical instrumentation) decidability for the elimination of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit from our claims. Strictly constructed Natural Law unite formal logic and formal science to provide decidability in matters of dispute. ”— Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Sciences:

1. Formal(Logics: logic, mathematics, algorithmic, operational). 2. Physical (the laws of nature). 3. Psychological (cognitive science), and; 4. Social (Social science: economics, law, politics, group strategy). P-law is a formal, operational, and algorithmic logic using a universally commensurable grammar (paradigm, vocabulary, logic grammar syntax), that tests (falsifies) every possible dimension of thought: coherent (consistent, correspondent, existentially and operationally possible). Now, you might arbitrarily define ‘science’, but by any present definition P-law is scientific. It is logical, empirical, operational, and under realism, naturalism, rational choice, and reciprocity. Human Faculties (physical process) > Epistemology > Grammar > Vocabulary > Speech > Due Diligence > including Ethics. Faculties:

1. Sense, Integration by prediction 2. Space-Time Modeling prediction, 3. Auto Association prediction (intuition), Auto Evaluation (emotion), 4. Attention-Recursion, 5. Reason, Planning, Calculation, Computation, 6. Action-Release > Repeat.Epistemology: Observation > Free Association > Hypothesis (reason tested) > Theory (operationally tested), > Surviving Theory (market tested) > Limitation > Falsification > Repeat. In P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Paradigm and Vocabulary, grammar, logic, and syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum of those grammars. A Grammar: refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness. Vocabulary: Deflation and disambiguation by competition, operationalization, and serialization, ex: Moral: Evil < Bad < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good > Righteous. or Truth: Tautological < Analytic < Idea < Testifiable < Honest < Untested. Speech: Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limited to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence),and sets of transactions. Due Diligence: realism, naturalism, sensory, identity (categorical), internal (logical), operational (actions in time), external (empirical), rational (bounded rationality), reciprocal (moral – reciprocal rationality), limited, fully accounted, warranteed, restitutable. Ethics (Morality): Productive, Fully informed, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warrantied, by due diligence against error bias and deceit, within the limits of restitution. No more sophistry. Philosophy is closed. Science has fully replaced it. P-law is complete. Including Metaphysics, Epistemology, Psychology, Ethics, Sociology, Economics, Politics, Law, Group Strategy, and Aesthetics.