Theme: Incentives

  • Yes. We have texas on our radar for a future conference. It depends on how often

    Yes. We have texas on our radar for a future conference. It depends on how often we can put them together, given the cost of doing so.

    Tickets aren’t expensive but they must at least cover the costs. We dont do these things for profit but we can’t lose money doing them.…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 02:08:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714463314447597792

    Reply addressees: @JackOfAwlTrades @NatLawInstitute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714453154404671618

  • Yes. We have texas on our radar for a future conference. It depends on how often

    Yes. We have texas on our radar for a future conference. It depends on how often we can put them together, given the cost of doing so.

    Tickets aren’t expensive but they must at least cover the costs. We dont do these things for profit but we can’t lose money doing them.

    Conservatives are unfortunately not willing to support organizations with $$ unless those organizations are serving teh older demographic and are as RINO as the archaics in congress.

    We have generally done well, but our donations aren’t very good right now – probably because we don’t promote them and possibly because we reached more people on FB than here on twitter – and maybe the FB people are more likely to donate.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 02:08:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714463314338545666

  • Path from majority tax to majority revenue is visible, but cannot be achieved ot

    Path from majority tax to majority revenue is visible, but cannot be achieved other than incrementally.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 01:04:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714447373248725141

    Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @shity_paradigm @JeffSnider_AIP

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714438428652105975

  • Q: Monopolies vs Cartels, and Purpose of the different corporate structures. 1 –

    Q: Monopolies vs Cartels, and Purpose of the different corporate structures.

    1 – Why would I prefer monopolies or cartels? I don’t understand this question. While virtual monoplies do exist – usualy for a short time – a monopoly is almost impossible to sustain without state sponsorship directly or by regulatory action. A Cartel is by definition a criminal conspiracy against the itnerests of the population.

    2 – The purpose of an llc, vs a sub-s, vs a c-corp is just (a) who pays taxes and (b) who is the final authority in the organization.
    … An llc allows the centralization of responsibility independent of the scale of each investment, can distribute profits in a manner unrelated to ownership, and the tax burden to be distributed to individuals. *(if there is one)
    … A sub-s is limited in number of shareholders, has a voting structure, distributes profits according to ownership percentage, and distributes tax burden to the individuals. (if there is any).
    … A c-corp is virtually unlimited in number of sharelholdres, has a voting structure, pays taxes direction, and then distributes dividends – prodoucing double taxation.

    LLC > S-Corp > C-Corp is a natural lifecycle.
    Startups often prefer an LLC
    Self funded businesses usually prefer and S-corp
    Investors prefer a C-Corp (it’s a tax thing).

    The purpose of corporations since their inception is to produce a shield between investors and the capital they place in the business. IE: the most they can lose is their investment. Though there is a requirement for directors and exec insurance in case they do something untoward – which given the complexity of the code isn’t hard.

    Reply addressees: @shity_paradigm @bryanbrey @JeffSnider_AIP


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 00:13:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714434614486351872

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714430315018833961

  • Indirectly yes. 1. central banks and the treasury facilitate credit expansion. 2

    Indirectly yes.
    1. central banks and the treasury facilitate credit expansion.
    2. And the central banks do have some idea of the amount of money created through credit expansion.
    When I discuss these matters I just throw the entire bucket into the fed, because in the end, that’s…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 23:59:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714431052003885302

    Reply addressees: @shity_paradigm @MinClaydough @bryanbrey @JeffSnider_AIP

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714427833689506273

  • Indirectly yes. 1. central banks and the treasury facilitate credit expansion. 2

    Indirectly yes.
    1. central banks and the treasury facilitate credit expansion.
    2. And the central banks do have some idea of the amount of money created through credit expansion.
    When I discuss these matters I just throw the entire bucket into the fed, because in the end, that’s who is both producing, recording, and most importantly insuring the new credit money.

    BELOW

    3. How Credit Expansion Operates
    4. Credit Expansion explained

    3. How Credit Expansion Operates. When banks expand credit by issuing new loans, they effectively increase the money supply. This is a fundamental concept in fractional-reserve banking, where banks are required to hold only a fraction of their deposits in reserve. The rest can be loaned out. When a bank makes a new loan, it credits the borrower’s account, thereby creating new money. This new money is a liability on the bank’s balance sheet but an asset for the borrower, who can spend it, thus increasing the active money supply.

    Here’s how it works in more detail:

    Fractional-Reserve System: Banks are required to hold a certain percentage (the reserve ratio) of their deposits in reserve. The rest can be loaned out.

    Loan Issuance: When a bank issues a loan, it credits the borrower’s account with the loan amount. This is new money that didn’t exist before.

    Money Multiplier Effect: The borrower spends the loan by transferring it to other accounts (e.g., buying a car, investing in a business, etc.). The recipients of that money may then deposit it into their own bank accounts, and the process continues, further expanding the money supply.

    Ledger & Accounting: Each loan and deposit is carefully recorded by the banks.

    Banks are generally required to report various statistics, including loan data, to the central bank. The specifics of what needs to be reported and how often can vary by jurisdiction. This data can be essential for the central bank’s monetary policy decisions. However, it’s worth noting that while the central bank can track the credit created by the banking system, this system is not perfect, and there is often a time lag between when credit is created and when it gets reported and analyzed.
    (which is why the fed is always ‘late’.)

    AND:

    4. Credit expansion refers to an increase in the availability of loans or the creation of new credit by financial institutions, typically banks. This usually occurs in response to a more accommodative monetary policy by a central bank, which lowers interest rates and eases reserve requirements. The fundamental aim is to stimulate economic activity by making borrowing cheaper and more accessible for both individuals and businesses.

    Here’s a step-by-step breakdown:

    Monetary Policy Shift: A central bank lowers interest rates and may also reduce reserve requirements for commercial banks. This action increases the amount of money that banks have at their disposal to lend.

    Increased Lending: Due to reduced interest rates and lower reserve requirements, commercial banks can now offer more loans and at more favorable terms. This incentivizes borrowing.

    Consumer Spending and Investment: As loans become cheaper and easier to obtain, consumers are more likely to borrow money for spending on goods, services, and investments. Businesses also take advantage of the lower borrowing costs to invest in expansion and development.

    Economic Stimulus: The increased borrowing and subsequent spending generally lead to higher economic activity. This is often measured in terms of growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

    Potential Risks: While credit expansion can stimulate economic growth, it can also lead to higher levels of debt and can potentially inflate asset bubbles. If the rates of borrowing outstrip the rates of repayment or productive investment, the economy could become unstable.

    Inflationary Pressure: An increase in the money supply through credit expansion can also lead to inflation, as more money chases the same amount of goods and services.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 23:59:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714431051626328064

  • I am betting against y’all in that regard, because I am 100% certain that when f

    I am betting against y’all in that regard, because I am 100% certain that when fedcoin comes out, they are going to offer to trade fedcoin for crypto for something like 30 days, and then prosecute it like it’s cocaine trafficing and outlaw crypto. (Especially given that a russian crypto exchange was used to get the money from iran to Hamas). If it wasn’t for institutional support at the moment it’d already be dead. But there is a very small chance that I”ll be wrong.

    Reply addressees: @MinClaydough @bryanbrey @JeffSnider_AIP


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 23:49:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714428337072799744

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714414858412708032

  • The velocity of money is due to the confidence the people have in their futures,

    The velocity of money is due to the confidence the people have in their futures, and the confidence of business, industry, and finance in risking on research, investment capitalization, production, distribution and sales that eventually end up in the hands of other businesses and consumers.
    The greatest systemic restraint to this process is the availability of money to do so at a price that accomodates the risk and the production distribution and sale cycle extends with increasingly complex networks of production – especialy those that involve the i-pencil problem.

    I suspect you like 99% of folks with some libertarian economic background haven’t made the transition from thiking in terms of money and assets to thinking in terms of time -becuase all assests, and all asset substitutes (money) are just stores of time. That is why they are variable. Becuase the value of time to ech person at every moment differes. Thankfully it averages out so prices are stable enough for price imputation and therefore risk calculation by invsetors and entrepreneurs.

    Reply addressees: @henge_j


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 23:00:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714416076237271040

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714386798212685995

  • Um. I don’t think you have that quite right. The velocity of money is the gdp in

    Um. I don’t think you have that quite right. The velocity of money is the gdp in time period over the money supply. So what yu’re implying is that if the money supply is increased then the velocity goes down. But that’s only true of the supply of money is not limiting the production of gdp – which it does. And so does interest. Especially consumer interest – for which tehre is no logical utility. The value of interest lies in the bringing forward of production in time, in competition with other attempts to bring forward producction in time. For the people, if they’re borrowing from themselves that’s already accounted for by their consumption.

    Reply addressees: @henge_j


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 22:54:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714414488923889664

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714387745496265131

  • If you were involved at all in heterodox econ (ie: variations on austrian) then

    If you were involved at all in heterodox econ (ie: variations on austrian) then all of this has been an obvious train wreck for a century or more.

    The problem is that the austrians (and other heterodox) didn’t know how to solve it. We probably do now. But it requires restructuring government’s relationship to the treasury, and changing govt from a purely revenue (extraction) entity to more mirror the monarchies as trying to make the state make money so that it needn’t interfere with the people and there economy as much as they do now – now that the false promise of endless growth has been gutted like a bull moose with a dull flint knife.

    Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @JeffSnider_AIP


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 22:47:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714412875974942720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714398901212496054