So if Twitter bans the right, it simply creates a market for @DRUDGE to take market share, and put an end to their leveraged business:dead.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 13:18:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798877998455943168
Theme: Incentives
-
In other words, we could leverage @DRUDGE to kill off (declining) Twitter’s deep
In other words, we could leverage @DRUDGE to kill off (declining) Twitter’s deep debt.Then with that success compete with FB: Full Reversal.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 08:24:00 UTC
-
So if Twitter bans the right, it simply creates a market for @DRUDGE to take mar
So if Twitter bans the right, it simply creates a market for @DRUDGE to take market share, and put an end to their leveraged business:dead.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 08:18:00 UTC
-
If we convince @DRUDGE to host a link to a twitter clone on the home page we can
If we convince @DRUDGE to host a link to a twitter clone on the home page we can create a competitor to twitter in 90 days. #NewRight #tcot
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 08:15:00 UTC
-
@_DanielleBasile it’s not hate. it’s just true. costs. we don’t want to pay cost
@_DanielleBasile it’s not hate. it’s just true. costs. we don’t want to pay costs.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 18:25:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798592850153865216
-
@_DanielleBasile most of it is ‘true’ in the sense that diversity increases fric
@_DanielleBasile most of it is ‘true’ in the sense that diversity increases frictions and lowers trust in exchange for signaling.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 18:24:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798592547568304129
-
The primary problem is the differences in opportunity costs as density decreases
The primary problem is the differences in opportunity costs as density decreases. Rural people police vast commons that urbans dont.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 17:57:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798585850741149696
-
The primary problem is the differences in opportunity costs as density decreases
The primary problem is the differences in opportunity costs as density decreases. Rural people police vast commons that urbans dont.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 12:57:00 UTC
-
End The Age of Monopoly Rule, and restore the west to it’s genius: markets in ev
End The Age of Monopoly Rule, and restore the west to it’s genius: markets in everything.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 12:37:00 UTC
-
Markets are simply the only means of preserving asymmetry and removing asymmetry
Markets are simply the only means of preserving asymmetry and removing asymmetry of power and information. Courts are the only means of preserving asymmetry of warranty of performance.
I don’t think markets are subordinate to hierarchy in any sense other than I think that they themselves prohibit hierarchy by permitting the meritocratic rise and fall of the classes by means of DEMONSTRATED ACTIONS.
I don’t think a market for commons divided by the classes of production is a hierarchy, it is just a means of recognizing the forms of production that the meritocratic families have managed to produce and hold onto: families, business, enterprises, territories, and monarchy.
The fact that there is greater SCALE OF MERIT in each class is simply a fact of the market operating to ensure that we demonstrate the greatest rotation and maintain the families businesses, enterprises, and institutions, with the greatest merit.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 12:32:00 UTC