No need for past unpleasantries. Just as marxism, neomarxism pomo, hbd-denial, and revisionist history were used here, it can be reversed quite easily. Incentives, sortition, and flight will serve its purpose, and the ‘century of pseudoscience’ will be over.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 03:45:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276360872416489472
Reply addressees: @gayjewishmale
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276359429328449537
No need for past unpleasantries. Just as marxism, neomarxism pomo, hbd-denial, and revisionist history were used here, it can be reversed quite easily. Incentives, sortition, and flight will serve its purpose, and the ‘century of pseudoscience’ will be over.
Reply addressees: @gayjewishmale
No. We will make it collapse – somewhat – but on our terms. And no ,you don’t want a gold based anything, nor a crypto and you’d have to be pretty ignorant of economics to even suggest it. Libertarians were as wrong about everything as marxists for the same reasons.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-24 21:21:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1275901851448291328
Reply addressees: @AndrewAnalytics
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1275895052640845824
No. We will make it collapse – somewhat – but on our terms. And no ,you don’t want a gold based anything, nor a crypto and you’d have to be pretty ignorant of economics to even suggest it. Libertarians were as wrong about everything as marxists for the same reasons.
Reply addressees: @AndrewAnalytics
On debt forgiveness and financial restructuring alone, no one is going to object. And those that do merely ‘step forward’ when everyone else steps back.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-24 13:32:00 UTC
3) Humans mask their economic incentives with moral claims, but as in all things ‘follow the money’. If we asked all the farmers today to go without immigrant labor, universities without foreigners, and services without minorities, prices would skyrocket, and bankruptcies ensue.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-20 13:00:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274326325004832768
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274325894119788546
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JulieBorowski 2) So instead of the high cost of paying for the repatriation of the slaves, and borrowing to compensate the southern farms to convert to employment labor,we had a far more costly civil war of anti-secession when the north realized that the south would rule the western expansion.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1274325894119788546
3) Humans mask their economic incentives with moral claims, but as in all things ‘follow the money’. If we asked all the farmers today to go without immigrant labor, universities without foreigners, and services without minorities, prices would skyrocket, and bankruptcies ensue.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Humans Flock Into Exhaustion and Correction: Life experience and individual corrections,business opportunities and business correction,market opportunities and economic correction, political opportunities and political corrections,military opportunities and military corrections.
Humans Flock Into Exhaustion and Correction: Life experience and individual corrections,business opportunities and business correction,market opportunities and economic correction, political opportunities and political corrections,military opportunities and military corrections.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-19 11:50:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273946221644853250
THE SOLUTION TO THE GREAT SORT OF THE 21ST CENTURY?
The future increase in selection pressure by intelligence is not a hard problem to solve at all. 1 – Groups divide by kinship interest, 2 – Elites for each group compete for and evolve their group. 3 – Limit bottom reproduction until marginal differences between groups are eliminated.
What’s the worst? Collecting the brightest in one polity thereby leaving all other polities behind, while fomenting conflict in that polity. What’s worst of all? Fomenting that conflict in the only laboring, working, lower-middle, and middle-class population that has developed high trust and truth-before-face, upon which the entire meritocratic edifice that gives the opportunity to those diverse elites is constructed – thereby ensuring the destruction of the high trust polity and return of kinship interest above all.
The world is not complex. If it seems so it is the lies used to circumvent the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws; the lies used to circumvent that only Europeans discovered, applied, and adapted to them; and in doing so dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, and disease; and that the world hates Europeans for doing so, and casts Europeans as oppressors as a proxy for nature and natures’ god, for most adapting to those physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. That is the reason for european exceptionalism. And the world shudders and does everything possible to deny it.
So what is the real problem? By inventing the age of sail in response to the Muslim conquest of Byzantium, and spreading around the world, Europeans reunited mankind, sought to bring them to their level of adaptation to physical natural and evolutionary laws – and the world it seems, cannot adapt and do so.
And so by the middle of this century, just as the european colonial project failed, the Jewish cosmopolitan project in all its Marxist, postmodernist, feminist forms, will fail, and we will end the costly failed experiment, and return to a conflict of civilizations, led by core states, advancing kinship interests, cooperating by trade, in a world where we must once again develop civilizational trade routes to survive, which will place us once again into military conflict over the returns on those routes.
In other words, a return to normal, and a return to speciation, especially speciation by intelligence – just as we have always speciated. And the chance that I err herein approaches zero.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-18 18:28:00 UTC