I don’t think the problem is a failure of understanding, but a failure of tolerance for the externalities caused by the presently available means of stimulus and accounting for it.
Measurable direct distribution of liquidity to consumers vs unmeasurable credit expansion.
Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2
Theme: Incentives
-
I don’t think the problem is a failure of understanding, but a failure of tolera
-
flat tax = simplicity and no ‘adds’. higher returns on tax b/c no loopholes at t
flat tax = simplicity and no ‘adds’. higher returns on tax b/c no loopholes at the top. Progressive tax = complex with adds. Lots of loopholes. Subsidy (Food stamp like today’s digital version) increased at the bottom to cover the flat tax producing null difference. ok?
Reply addressees: @2count2 @JadeBai85455803 -
flat tax = simplicity and no ‘adds’. higher returns on tax b/c no loopholes at t
flat tax = simplicity and no ‘adds’. higher returns on tax b/c no loopholes at the top. Progressive tax = complex with adds. Lots of loopholes. Subsidy (Food stamp like today’s digital version) increased at the bottom to cover the flat tax producing null difference. ok?
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-28 22:08:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277363390474866689
Reply addressees: @2count2 @JadeBai85455803
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277360235632623616
-
You’re kind of stupid right? Meaning the corporate tax rate was causing industri
You’re kind of stupid right? Meaning the corporate tax rate was causing industrial flight, and he’s been trying to repatriate the industry here that just demonstrated it’s all been moved to china under your democratic heritage – right? You want redistribution it’s from finance.
Reply addressees: @SteveRustad1 -
You’re kind of stupid right? Meaning the corporate tax rate was causing industri
You’re kind of stupid right? Meaning the corporate tax rate was causing industrial flight, and he’s been trying to repatriate the industry here that just demonstrated it’s all been moved to china under your democratic heritage – right? You want redistribution it’s from finance.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-28 22:01:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277361410557739010
Reply addressees: @SteveRustad1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277341223104262151
-
Nope. I didn’t invent this. I took it from the research. You can look it up. Fla
Nope. I didn’t invent this. I took it from the research. You can look it up. Flat tax means flat tax, no payroll nothing. Those funds like today, are funded by the flat tax, the difference is that they are in your account, not spent.
There is nothing I didn’t think of. Sorry.
Reply addressees: @2count2 @JadeBai85455803 -
Nope. I didn’t invent this. I took it from the research. You can look it up. Fla
Nope. I didn’t invent this. I took it from the research. You can look it up. Flat tax means flat tax, no payroll nothing. Those funds like today, are funded by the flat tax, the difference is that they are in your account, not spent.
There is nothing I didn’t think of. Sorry.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-28 21:53:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277359490774466560
Reply addressees: @2count2 @JadeBai85455803
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277358838539268103
-
Government EVOLVES into that as ALL organizations evolve into that.The question
Government EVOLVES into that as ALL organizations evolve into that.The question is producing a system for disposing of rent seekers, and it’s very very difficult. Most organizations do it by making many small distributed organizations, or creating project based sub-organizations.
Reply addressees: @Thanos3rd -
Government EVOLVES into that as ALL organizations evolve into that.The question
Government EVOLVES into that as ALL organizations evolve into that.The question is producing a system for disposing of rent seekers, and it’s very very difficult. Most organizations do it by making many small distributed organizations, or creating project based sub-organizations.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-28 21:45:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277357503861358596
Reply addressees: @Thanos3rd
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277355979085156353
-
Well again, you know, let’s not try to reductio the argument and miss the point.
Well again, you know, let’s not try to reductio the argument and miss the point. (a) 1% is lot of fking people. (b) the money is not convertible to spending by anyone, because it would reduce everyone else’s value recursively (c) the federal reserve is an ancient scam we can fix.
Reply addressees: @Zeke58853349