Every single case of a developmental, traumatic, or voluntary defect, causes demand for sedation of the competitive pressure of social stigma for it.
This is why religious people, sophists, and drug users all try to get others to join: to reduce the stress of self-monitoring.
Reply addressees: @violetabyssus @SPQRIUS @SepteusT @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT
Theme: Incentives
-
Every single case of a developmental, traumatic, or voluntary defect, causes dem
-
“Rich people don’t pay ANY taxes.”— Rich people pay almost ALL the taxes. In f
—“Rich people don’t pay ANY taxes.”—
Rich people pay almost ALL the taxes. In fact, if we changed it so that only rich people paid federal taxes and kept the rest of the taxes locally that would help us all a great deal.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-28 20:37:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1310680088682401793
-
You can testify to what you claim, or you can’t. You can’t. Your claims can past
You can testify to what you claim, or you can’t. You can’t. Your claims can past the test of testifiability, or they can’t. They can’t. Then we are left only with incentives. You have incentives to lie. So you have means, motive, and opportunity to lie. Ergo: Judgment: Guilty.
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @William68332190 @SepteusT @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT -
You can testify to what you claim, or you can’t. You can’t. Your claims can past
You can testify to what you claim, or you can’t. You can’t. Your claims can past the test of testifiability, or they can’t. They can’t. Then we are left only with incentives. You have incentives to lie. So you have means, motive, and opportunity to lie. Ergo: Judgment: Guilty.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-26 16:14:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309889107141763072
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @William68332190 @SepteusT @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309882277191651328
-
Yes I do. I understand consciousness, incentives to imaginary paradigms, auto as
Yes I do. I understand consciousness, incentives to imaginary paradigms, auto association, psychosis, schizophrenia and paranoid schizophrenia. The only question is deviation from measurement by action that falsifies cognitive and psychological defect in imagination: addiction.
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @William68332190 @SepteusT @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT -
Yes I do. I understand consciousness, incentives to imaginary paradigms, auto as
Yes I do. I understand consciousness, incentives to imaginary paradigms, auto association, psychosis, schizophrenia and paranoid schizophrenia. The only question is deviation from measurement by action that falsifies cognitive and psychological defect in imagination: addiction.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-26 14:08:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309857312086032386
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @William68332190 @SepteusT @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309854257059946496
-
“Curt Doolittle What is your opinion on the future of the “internationalised” su
—“Curt Doolittle What is your opinion on the future of the “internationalised” supply chain? Will the jobs problem in the economies that have outsourced production of goods & services compel politicians to be not so enthusiastic about global supply chains or will it be business as usual i.e. outsourcing to low wage jurisdictions?”—Rakesh Sahgal
I think the global system is over as soon as american defense of it is over, because americans and british (mostly british) built it. But international stability is no longer in american or british interests – the opposite.
My policy recommendations are to cut all labor arbitrage in favor of higher prices but local employment. If my policy says that then you can bet there are hundreds of other guys in the wings with more influence in DC with the same ideas.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-22 22:28:00 UTC
-
No. A modern government, capable of issuing its own currency, cannot go bankrupt
No.
A modern government, capable of issuing its own currency, cannot go bankrupt per se. It cannot be unable to pay its debts as long as the debts are denominated in the government’s currency.
It can just pay off its DEBTES as a counterfeiter could.
What the government CAN do is print and SPEND money and inflate its way into zero purchasing power.
When people look at Venezuela or zimbabwe or most failed state economies, it’s because the government has spent the currency out of purchasing power. But there are a lot of ways to do that.
This is more difficult in relatively autarkic countries (America, France) that consume their own production and import very little than it is for countries that depend on imports and exports because of insufficient local production and productivity.
If you need imports and you spend your currency into low purchasing power, you might be able to get credit, or credit denominated in foreign currencies. And then you can go bankrupt on that debt. (ie: Greece).
If you need imports (particularly energy), and you spend your currency into zero purchasing power, then you’re the equivalent of bankrupt. Not because you have no money to spend, but because the money you have to spend has no purchasing power (isn’t worth anything.)
The problem European countries have, especially Italy, is that they can’t control their currencies so they can’t inflate away their debt by printing money. Occasional Inflating away debt (printing money to pay off debt) isn’t necessarily a bad thing because it takes time for such payments to work their way through the economy.
Borrowing against yourself – meaning printing money you expect to collect later in taxes somehow, or otherwise, turn into some sort of returns on capital (like airports or railways our energy production), isn’t a bad thing either. What you want to avoid is systemically affecting the pricing structure so that finance, industry, business, and consumers alter their behavior (stop spending).
What causes problems for all governments are ‘rents’ (privileges). Like.. you know, all those benefits we like to have. All those government salaries. …
Why is this problem serious? Because there is no feedback loop, so the problem of market correction is extended into the government leading to ‘government correction’ – and that’s really, really, really, bad.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-22 20:36:00 UTC
-
How many theories must fail?
A stock market consists of theories, a bond market of promises, a business of a gamble. How many of those theories have to fail before promises can’t be kept and gamblers lose their hand? Let me put this in perspective ok? Five companies, Just five, create the illusion that the market has expanded. Take that out and it’s something like 2008. This isn’t working. We can correct it but we need to correct it before we have no choice, and suffer doing it.
-
How many theories must fail?
A stock market consists of theories, a bond market of promises, a business of a gamble. How many of those theories have to fail before promises can’t be kept and gamblers lose their hand? Let me put this in perspective ok? Five companies, Just five, create the illusion that the market has expanded. Take that out and it’s something like 2008. This isn’t working. We can correct it but we need to correct it before we have no choice, and suffer doing it.