Only via positivas are useful to the masses. We can know the via-negativas (harms, thefts, costs). But we cannot know the range of via positivas – only the market can determine them. If we institutionalize the via-negativas, people will develop and market via-positivas (virtues).
Reply addressees: @NinasNiche
Theme: Incentives
-
Only via positivas are useful to the masses. We can know the via-negativas (harm
-
Only via positivas are useful to the masses. We can know the via-negativas (harm
Only via positivas are useful to the masses. We can know the via-negativas (harms, thefts, costs). But we cannot know the range of via positivas – only the market can determine them. If we institutionalize the via-negativas, people will develop and market via-positivas (virtues).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 19:02:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315729661264093186
Reply addressees: @NinasNiche
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315728471256166400
-
We finally found the incentive for you to lie. 😉
We finally found the incentive for you to lie. 😉
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
We finally found the incentive for you to lie. 😉
We finally found the incentive for you to lie. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 17:46:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315710323387703300
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315703065899655169
-
I am sharing an opinion piece that fits the incentives. To date it is the most c
I am sharing an opinion piece that fits the incentives. To date it is the most consistent, correspondent, operationally demonstrated, rationally incentivized, and coherent, theory and no other comes close – especially if you understand the left’s method of lying. (I teach it.)
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
I am sharing an opinion piece that fits the incentives. To date it is the most c
I am sharing an opinion piece that fits the incentives. To date it is the most consistent, correspondent, operationally demonstrated, rationally incentivized, and coherent, theory and no other comes close – especially if you understand the left’s method of lying. (I teach it.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 16:05:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315685040785850380
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315684126993854467
-
Following incentives is rather simple. Humans always and everywhere follow incen
Following incentives is rather simple.
Humans always and everywhere follow incentives.
And make excuses for having done so.
The only excuse is reciprocity.
Reciprocity is antithetical to the left.
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
Following incentives is rather simple. Humans always and everywhere follow incen
Following incentives is rather simple.
Humans always and everywhere follow incentives.
And make excuses for having done so.
The only excuse is reciprocity.
Reciprocity is antithetical to the left.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 15:59:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315683548012126214
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315683162643726338
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Sarpicus @ramzpaul All knowledge that is non-tautological is theoretical. The question is only whether it is consistent, correspondent, and operationally possible. And if operationally possible whether it adheres to rational human incentives where Left=Theft + Dysgenic vs Right=Merit + Eugenic.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1315683162643726338
-
3. This strategy is the optimum solution to the prisoners’ dilemma, and the opti
3. This strategy is the optimum solution to the prisoners’ dilemma, and the optimum strategy for maximizing cooperation – and it is completely contrary to natural human instinct to favor family, clan, kin.
-
3. This strategy is the optimum solution to the prisoners’ dilemma, and the opti
3. This strategy is the optimum solution to the prisoners’ dilemma, and the optimum strategy for maximizing cooperation – and it is completely contrary to natural human instinct to favor family, clan, kin.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 19:30:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837497261621249
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837495638364161
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
2. (a)Eradication of hatred from the human heart. (b)The extension of kinship love to kindred, (c)The demand for personal acts of charity to do so. (d)The exhaustion of forgiveness in pursuit of cooperation, before boycott, ostracization, punishment, or war.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312837495638364161