Theme: Incentives

  • Interesting that Elon was wrong. The capital requirements were too high and he w

    Interesting that Elon was wrong. The capital requirements were too high and he wasn’t recognizing or accepting what was the obvious.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-16 19:54:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857875030132273472

    Reply addressees: @turbotobias @ohabryka

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857824335953646002

  • RT @PhilipDerrida: A very common cycle: – Society puts the boot on a group – The

    RT @PhilipDerrida: A very common cycle:
    – Society puts the boot on a group
    – The group learns to behave better
    – Society forgets why the bo…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-15 14:35:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857432258510279003

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @Masq811 @gspeth @RichardDawkins I stated his frame and incen

    RT @curtdoolittle: @Masq811 @gspeth @RichardDawkins I stated his frame and incentives. Note that every response in this dumpster fire of a…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-15 04:41:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857282718805196966

  • I stated his frame and incentives. Note that every response in this dumpster fir

    I stated his frame and incentives. Note that every response in this dumpster fire of a thread, does nothing but engage in disapproval, projection, shamming, rallying, fictionalizing, distraction, and of course, undermining – hiding behind pretenses of knowledge and virtue that cant be demonstrated in a single response.
    All humans act rationally within their limits (bounded rationality). If you cannot state the rational incentives of those who oppose you then you are demonstrating incompetence and intellectual dishonesty. Which is precisely why you resort to the pretense that your approval has any more merit than a child’s disappointment over ice cream flavor.
    I haven’t heard an argument yet. In fact, I am quite certain none are forthcoming. Because you cannot demonstrate the behavior you (collectively do) without demonstrating you lack the ability to engage in an argument.
    Infantilization worked. On you.

    Reply addressees: @Masq811 @gspeth @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-15 04:41:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857282704720728064

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857279259754336737

  • “BUT BUT BUT TRUMP DIDN”T PAY CONTRACTORS!!!” I have some rather deep knowledge

    “BUT BUT BUT TRUMP DIDN”T PAY CONTRACTORS!!!”

    I have some rather deep knowledge of the commercial construction industry as I worked on designing software for the multinationals. It’s a low profit, high risk, conflict, corruption, and cheating permeated business.

    Guess: What percent of profits are determined by the outcome of lawsuits between the various contractors, developers, and financiers involved?

    Why would you imagine that there were NOT disputes between the various contractors on large scale developments?

    Why do you assume that the simplicity of your little world of experience has anything to do with the complexity of such contentious experience? It’s like the simple mom who assumes the society reflects the simplicity of the family, or the simple dad that assumes the economy reflects the simplicity of his personal finances or his small business.

    Especially when you’re dealing with unions and governments and bribes and attempts at cheating and discounts, or poorly done work, or material substitutions etc?

    LET ME HELP YOU
    In large scale commercial construction projects, lawsuits between contractors, developers, and financiers can significantly impact profits due to the complexity and high stakes involved. While there isn’t a definitive statistic available from the provided search results that directly answers this question, we can infer from general industry insights:

    Cost Overruns and Disputes: It’s known that construction projects often face cost overruns due to various reasons including litigation over delays, change orders, or disputes regarding project specifications or contracts. According to some data, a considerable amount of project costs can escalate due to these disputes, which indirectly affects profit margins.

    Profit Margins in Construction: Typically, profit margins in construction can be quite low, often in the range of 1.4% to 3.5% for general contractors and subcontractors respectively. Given these narrow margins, any significant legal battles can substantially alter profitability.

    Impact of Lawsuits: From a practical perspective, if a lawsuit results in penalties, delay costs, or settlement fees, these could easily consume a large portion of the profit margin, sometimes even leading to losses rather than profits. However, guessing a specific percentage:

    A reasonable estimate might be that lawsuits could influence anywhere from 10% to 30% of the profit in large-scale commercial construction projects. This estimate considers:
    – The frequency and impact of legal disputes in construction.
    – The potential for legal costs to exceed initial project budgets, thereby eating into profit margins.
    – This range accounts for both the direct legal fees and the indirect costs like project delays and rework, but it’s worth noting this is a speculative guess based on general industry trends rather than specific data from the search results provided.

    SImple version: profitability is determined by the outcome of legal disputes between the parties.

    That’s why you don’t go into that. business unless you came up through that business. It’s also why the best companies ‘tie down’ the best contractors in each field and seek to keep them busy so that they have access to them. If you ever watched the bidding on a major construction process it would make the absurdity of political voting look simple by comparison.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @arianhod_o @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-15 02:06:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857243857894952961

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857238306951671962

  • If person A’s policies favor a stronger economy, lower debt load, and stronger g

    If person A’s policies favor a stronger economy, lower debt load, and stronger geostrategic security (material consequences), and person B’s policies favor the marxist sequence of equity (equality), diversity (non-homogeneity), lawlessness, homelessness, drug use, immigration, in oder to bring about central management of the economy, then why would anyone choose person B’s policies for any reason other than immaturity and ignorance?

    Reply addressees: @RobTheLandi @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 15:38:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856723310199091200

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856719773846921725

  • No I’m a serial entrepreneur traveling in smaller but similar circles having dev

    No I’m a serial entrepreneur traveling in smaller but similar circles having developed and used the same strategies given the rather scumbag dominance of east coast finanace, unions, bureaucrats, governments, and that’s before we start with overseas equivalents and their bribes etc. Now, I’m a hypermoral person that’s put multiple people away via the justice department, and assisted my country in intelligence matters. But that doesn’t mean I don’t understand what trump does, what all of intel does, and how and why he does it. What I admire is that he is so effective at the moral message of the masses on one hand and negotiating with hostiles inside and outside our government on the other. It takes extraordinary fortitude cunning and strategy to do it and he does it consistently.

    Reply addressees: @rghers @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 04:42:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856558259320291328

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856555022131060778

  • Read the art of the deal. What he did was cause a lot of bankers to buy into a d

    Read the art of the deal. What he did was cause a lot of bankers to buy into a deal that he then refinanced. It was genius. Whether it was ethical or not depends upon your view of bankers.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 03:42:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856543194038837538

    Reply addressees: @Theleftorwright @gspeth @RichardDawkins

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856541688799363350

  • None of us is perfect. And some of us defend our brand and as a result our incom

    None of us is perfect. And some of us defend our brand and as a result our income by holding to our imperfections. That said, being the best may not be perfect, but it’s still the best.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 02:53:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856530752739127579

    Reply addressees: @Draconaissance @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856528681646305447

  • PETER (All)l If Trump is correct, and he causes the treasury to purchase 1M BTC

    PETER (All)l
    If Trump is correct, and he causes the treasury to purchase 1M BTC over five years there is a near certainty it will hit 250M.

    I have been a skeptic since my first involvement in 2012 given the ease with which a state can collapse the value by creating its own CBDC. But the moment the state is invested in the medium AND prohibits a central bank digital currency, then BTC will fulfill the at least the promise of store of value, even if the technology is insufficient for service as a currency substitute for the purpose of trades.

    Reply addressees: @PeterSchiff


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 00:18:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856491801286508544

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856484543311569246