Theme: Incentives

  • You clearly cant read the data. The optimum solution is to continue to fund ukra

    You clearly cant read the data. The optimum solution is to continue to fund ukraine as russia’s economy collapses which is happening. They are at full employment and maximum production for at least one more year – at which point Russia will be unable to finance the war, be stuck in stagflation, the rest of the siberian oil and gas production will stop never to be restarted. and if the saudis agree to increase production, driving down the price of oil below russian costs the timeline will accelerate.
    Russia is poorer than mexico.

    Reply addressees: @SirSmokesAaLot


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-24 09:02:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860609836616138752

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860599224519561375

  • RT @slantchev: Russia is in very deep trouble because its economy cannot sustain

    RT @slantchev: Russia is in very deep trouble because its economy cannot sustain the war expenditures on the scale it needs to be able to a…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-24 07:30:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860586820372955516

  • You are a good person. You are also naive. 😉 Europe will carry more of ukraine’

    You are a good person. You are also naive. 😉 Europe will carry more of ukraine’s weight. And Trump will not abandon Ukraine. EVERYTHING Trump says is negotiation and EVERYTHING Putin says is posturing. It’s kabuki theater for the masses. No one with any knowledge of the constraints is fooled. All humans act rationally given the knowledge and incentives at their disposal, and no one chooses suicide for his people.

    Reply addressees: @drmiller1960


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-23 19:30:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860405490427265027

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860403774734348730

  • NO EUROPEANS AREN’T POLITICALLY VIRTUOUS –“Health Care? Denmark does not have t

    NO EUROPEANS AREN’T POLITICALLY VIRTUOUS
    –“Health Care? Denmark does not have to pay for its own defence, the US pays and guarantees protection. Imagine if the US didn’t have a military budget, and an almost equally large debt service to finance it, because another country had sworn to protect it. Yes, the USA could afford Medicare for All (which is all they need) if Americans weren’t carrying the weight of world defense, finance, distribution and trade, granting nearly unfettered access to our vast market and capital, and exporting the potential income of our working and laboring classes to encourage developing countries to join this costly international order Americans pay for. Which is precisely why Americans are returning to isolationism. And the fact that Europeans and Canadians insult Americans over this matter only encouraged Americans to return to Isolation: false virtue signaling at others’ expense, and lack of gratitude are enough to anger anyone.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-23 19:27:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1860404725075836928

  • (Reaction to manosphere video) Why do women think men lack the confidence and se

    (Reaction to manosphere video)
    Why do women think men lack the confidence and security in approaching them? Rather than that men consider them too much effort for too much social risk, for too much maintenance for too little return.
    It’s just beyond me that women can’t comprehend the simplicity of male assessment of women. Women see men as OPPORTUNITIES, but men see women as COSTS.
    The reason is, modern women only bring sex to the relationship. Are they providing nesting (home), care, peace? It’s all about their consumption instead. As such, women are a luxury good (sex) and nothing else – unless their cost is worth the effort necessary for the man to find ‘peace’ at home.
    Men are aware of the degree of their ability to competitively produce surpluses that women want to consume. If a woman is too costly in time effort stress and income then it’s just not worth pursuing her.
    Instead of these ‘city girls’ watch how men react to country girls. It’s so obvious. Women don’t style up for men – they do it for women – and in doing so they drive up their perceived cost to men, and lower their perceived value to men, because women’s investment is for themselves and other women – not men.
    You will never be more beautiful to a man who loves you than you are waking up in the morning, with messy hair, no makeup, and relaxed features, after wearing one of his shirts to sleep in.
    Just is.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 23:33:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859741874879340544

  • Robert is wrong. Power law over capital is not only optimum but necessary. Paret

    Robert is wrong. Power law over capital is not only optimum but necessary. Pareto must rule. The question isn’t capital it’s income and assets sufficient for risk moderation. As such our people are under insured, under paid, overburdened with consumer interest, and over taxed.…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 19:43:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859684010928329055

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859318335256584473

  • Regarding Dating Single Moms: Still seeing the social media fervor over single m

    Regarding Dating Single Moms:
    Still seeing the social media fervor over single mothers rebelling against men not wanting to date or marry them. I understand both sides. But I can’t understand why women can’t understand it.
    I’ve learned a lot because I have a bunch of ‘stepkids’ from the single mom’s I’ve dated (or married):
    1) You will have to adapt to her life not her to yours.
    2) You will always come in second after the kids.
    3) You cannot discipline the children other than in their behavior toward you.
    4) She will expect you to carry the financial weight of the kids despite this – and still use her money for her own purposes.
    5) She will burden you with whatever trauma she has from her previous relationships. And often it will make you want to leave.

    Why does this work – at least, for me:
    1) Busy mom’s impose limited demands on me and my time are in my favor (as a workaholic).
    2) I can get along with everyone easily so fitting into a household is easy – in fact I prefer a woman’s sovereignty in the home as long as I have my ‘peaceful’ place to reset, work, and think.
    3) I can defer to her without impact on my ego as long as it is not a risk to me, cost to me, or disrespectful to me. (Never tolerate disrespect.)
    4) I can support the kids or mom when one or the other gets out of hand – which always happens and makes me trusted by both.
    5) I follow the same strategy in all relationships with women: figure out what makes them feel safe, and provide it. Conversely, figure out if they desire attention, and if so … Run.
    6) I maintain walk away power – which must never be stated, but always preserved.
    That’s why it works for me. I can’t see most men, who need the emotional connection, support, and respect (male version of validation), tolerating these conditions. When they are the optimum conditions for me.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 00:56:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859400475084488704

  • Regarding Dating Single Moms: Still seeing the social media fervor over single m

    Regarding Dating Single Moms:
    Still seeing the social media fervor over single mothers rebelling against men wanting to date or marry them. I understand both sides. But I can’t understand why women can’t understand it.
    I’ve learned a lot because I have a bunch of ‘stepkids’ from the single mom’s I’ve dated (or married):
    1) You will have to adapt to her life not her to yours.
    2) You will always come in second after the kids.
    3) You cannot discipline the children other than in their behavior toward you.
    4) She will expect you to carry the financial weight of the kids despite this – and still use her money for her own purposes.
    5) She will burden you with whatever trauma she has from her previous relationships. And often it will make you want to leave.

    Why does this work – at least, for me:
    1) Busy mom’s impose limited demands on me and my time are in my favor (as a workaholic).
    2) I can get along with everyone easily so fitting into a household is easy – in fact I prefer a woman’s sovereignty in the home as long as I have my ‘peaceful’ place to reset, work, and think.
    3) I can defer to her without impact on my ego as long as it is not a risk to me, cost to me, or disrespectful to me. (Never tolerate disrespect.)
    4) I can support the kids or mom when one or the other gets out of hand – which always happens and makes me trusted by both.
    5) I follow the same strategy in all relationships with women: figure out what makes them feel safe, and provide it. Conversely, figure out if they desire attention, and if so … Run.
    6) I maintain walk away power – which must never be stated, but always preserved.
    That’s why it works for me. I can’t see most men, who need the emotional connection, support, and respect (male version of validation), tolerating these conditions. When they are the optimum conditions for me.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 00:56:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859399089173237760

  • I agree that I should have included ‘who’ to borrow from in that list. And the b

    I agree that I should have included ‘who’ to borrow from in that list. And the broader context is that of course, the institute recommends elimination of interest on consumer debt by direct credit from the treasury, and direct payment against that debt by redistributions on…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-18 18:59:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858585806631526743

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858584374578692275

  • THE NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF DEBT If you maximize your debt capacity on investment

    THE NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF DEBT
    If you maximize your debt capacity on investments you are operating at the optimum for yourself and your family – or your country. The question is only whether you’re financing speculations, returns, expenses, or refinancing debt. No modern economy or country can survive competition without utilizing its debt capacity to maximize returns.

    The problem is not adhering to the budget, it’s a failure to use debt to produce the returns that constantly expand the budget – while preserving enough reserves to adapt to shocks (crisis, disaster, plague, war).

    Debt is just an expression of our attempt to accelerate returns on time.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-18 18:38:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858580582692974592