Theme: Grammar

FOR MY NEW FRIENDS. THIS IS WHAT I DO.

The subject of my writing is an analytic philosophy called Propertarianism, a tool for creating a value-free language for communicating conceptual, behavioral, moral, social, legal, political, economic, and group competitive strategies. In other words, Propertarianism is a formal language of social science.

The purpose of this language is to both prevent the great political errors, lies, and deceptions, and to help us understand our feelings and ideas in scientific terms.

Propertarianism is a way to say things which are true, but that many do not wish to be true. Every culture that has been transformed by an enlightenment (science) embodying errors, lies and deceptions that I want to correct.

MY GOAL IS LIBERTY

By ‘liberty’ I mean ‘choice’ — choice dependent upon manners, ethics, morals, and merit. Not choice dependent upon taking from others.

MY SOLUTION IS MARKET GOVERNMENT

I am against MAJORITARIAN democracy. But in favor of democratic production of common goods and services – where citizens vote for the commons that they want, not for corrupt politicians. The reasons are too complex for this post. But it is not an emotional, but scientific reason.

MARKET GOVERNMENT NEEDS TESTS OF TRUTHFULNESS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

The problem in creating government that is honest is that we did not know how to test if laws and legislation were ‘true’ and therefore ‘scientific’, and therefore objectively ethical and moral. I produced this test of truthfulness. This test expands the scientific method into the social sciences -and unites biology, philosophy, morality and law into a single logical method. This method is called ‘testimonial truth’. And the philosophy of using this method is called ‘testimonialism’. The word to testify means that you have done diligence to ensure that you have spoken truthfully (not just honestly), and that you warranty (guarantee) that you have done that diligence.

DEMONSTRATION OF THESE IDEAS

All of my arguments demonstrate the failure of the enlightenment and the failures of majority democracy.

IF I OFFEND YOU PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS MY PURPOSE TO OFFEND YOUR INTUITIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THE POSSIBILITY OF A VERY DIFFERENT WORLD.

A world where governments are unable to engage in corruption and deceit. One in which we produce common property without representative politicians open to corruption.

WE NEED TO CRITICIZE OURSELVES. THE REASON WE ARE PREYED UPON BY EVIL PEOPLE IS THE PERSON IN THE MIRROR HAS NOT STOPPED THEM.

Sincerely

Curt Doolittle

(edited by D Frank Robinson )

————————————-original prior to edits————–

FOR MY NEW FRIENDS

I write write in an analytic philosophy called Propertarianism. The purpose of this language is to create a value-free (neutral) tool for communicating conceptual, behavioral, ethical, moral, social, legal, political, economic, and group competitive strategies.

In other words Propertarianism is a formal language of social science.

The purpose of this language is to both prevent the great political errors, lies, and deceptions, and to help us understand our feelings and ideas in scientific terms.

When write here I very often say things that are true, but that we do not wish to be true. The reason is that I want to correct the errors, lies, and deceptions of the enlightenments – all of them, in every culture that has been transformed by an enlightenment (science).

MY GOAL IS LIBERTY

By ‘liberty’ I mean ‘choice’. But choice dependent upon manners, ethics, morals, and merit. Not choice dependent upon taking from others.

MY SOLUTION IS MARKET GOVERNMENT

I am against MAJORITY democracy. But in favor of Democratic production of common goods and services – where citizens vote for the commons that they want, not for corrupt politicians. The reasons are too complex for this post. But it is not an emotional, but scientific reason.

BUT FOR MARKET GOVERNMENT WE NEED TESTS OF TRUTHFULNESS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

The problem in creating government that is honest is that we did not know how to test if laws and legislation were ‘true’ and therefore ‘scientific’, and therefore objectively ethical and moral. I produced this test of truthfulness. This test expands the scientific method into the social sciences -and unites biology, philosophy, morality and law into a single logical method. This method is called ‘testimonial truth’. And the philosophy of using this method is called ‘testimonialism’. The word to testify means that you have done diligence to ensure that you have spoken truthfully (not just honestly), and that you warranty (guarantee) that you have done that diligence.

WHEN YOU READ OR HEAR MY CRITICISMS – IT”S ALWAYS TO DEMONSTRATE THESE IDEAS.

All of my arguments are somehow connected with the failure of the enlightenment and the failures of majority democracy.

SO IF I OFFEND YOU PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS MY PURPOSE TO OFFEND YOUR INTUITIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THE POSSIBILITY OF A VERY DIFFERENT WORLD.

One where governments are unable to engage in corruption and deceit. One in which we produce common property without representative politicians open to corruption.

I PREFER TO CRITICiZE OURSEVES. THE REASON WE ARE PREYED UPON BY EVIL PEOPLE IS THE PERSON IN THE MIRROR HAS NOT STOPPED THEM.

Sincerely

Curt Doolittle