Theme: Grammar

  • I don’t have any markers for sociopathy – just the opposite. I do have minor mar

    I don’t have any markers for sociopathy – just the opposite.
    I do have minor markers for aspergers.
    And it is trivial to diagnose others through their use of language – the entire fields of psychometrics computational linguistics do so. I just specialize more than othres in sex…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 21:33:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720554712900993532

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720552182129295870

  • Parrhesia Of course not. Though you are demonstrating a great example of NAXALT/

    Parrhesia
    Of course not.
    Though you are demonstrating a great example of NAXALT/AXALT which is to personalize the impersonal. Or more technically, to treat a general statemetn made by the systematizing mind of men, which always presumes a distribution (not an equality) as a universal (equality).
    We know (neurologically, biologically) why women demonstrate this defense mechanism. We just aren’t sure how to educate women to apply that mechanism only to interpersonal instead of social, economic, and political domains.

    Reply addressees: @parrhesiatruth @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:32:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720524392491368448

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720520666342932914

  • “The linguistic complexity has a specific purpose. Removal of it defeats that pu

    –“The linguistic complexity has a specific purpose. Removal of it defeats that purpose.”– Eric Morgan

    Eric’s insightful as usual.

    We have run experiments at trying to ‘dumb down’ The Work for less sophisticated audiences. And we’ve even explained what is ‘lost’ by each… https://twitter.com/GestaltedApe/status/1720452844782842306


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 15:50:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720468426680828400

  • I completely understand. Really. And I’ll happily block you to protect you from

    I completely understand. Really.
    And I’ll happily block you to protect you from it. 😉
    But seriously, my work looks like english, but it’s more akin to mathematics: it’s an operational logic constructed from the heirarchy of first principles (scientific laws) that emerge in a predictable pattern as complexity increases from subatomic physicsl thruogh life through our most complex thoughts. The best analogy is a descriptive programming language, except it’s a descriptive programming language for everything.
    If I used symbolism like say, mathematics, set logic, or chemistry you wouldn’t be troubled by it. But because I write it as we used to write mathematics and presently write programming, in ‘pseudocode’ you think you should understand it – but you don’t because you can’t.
    On average it takes a 140IQ about a year to grasp it. If you have knowledge of a hard science, and some training in either the scientific method or economics it’s a bit easier.
    If you *DO* want to understand it, you’ll need to watch the Methods, Foundations, Choice and Thoughts videos.
    The method describes the methodology.
    The Foundations describes how it’s applied.
    The Choice describes our current crisis.
    The Thoughts videos are commentary.
    Otherwise do what everyone else does and plan on taking two to four years to undersetand it all.
    And as a consequence … understand EVERYTHING. And obtain the mindfulness that results from understanding everything.

    So I’m sympathetic. Really.
    But this turns out to be what’s necessary to solve the problem of the age, the crisis of the age, and to implement a law that prevents a repetition of this problem and crisis.

    Cheers 😉

    Reply addressees: @smugalongsmugly


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-02 21:53:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720197441318772736

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720132143920148786

  • I take great pride in my autistic ‘talents’. 😉 But did you mean schizo (schizop

    I take great pride in my autistic ‘talents’. 😉

    But did you mean schizo (schizophrenia) or schitzo (like sh*t-zoid? Because, assuming the latter is a slang neologism, the terms mean the opposite (I think). Now I’m not sure. 😉 Wait. I’m confused… lol


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-30 14:38:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719000729715667319

    Reply addressees: @govmntisbadmkay

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718997711339307247

  • No ideology is never required. Not true whatsoever. Systems of Reasoning 1. Reas

    No ideology is never required. Not true whatsoever.

    Systems of Reasoning
    1. Reason is required for comparison and wayfinding .
    2. A paradigm is necessary for reasoning.
    3. A methodology is required for reasoning (adversarial competition) in paradigm.
    4. So, all that is necessary is a paradigm, vocabulary, logic, and grammar for reasoning within any paradigm. 5. Paradigms differ only in permissible and impermissible content.
    6. The spectrum of paradigms evolves from man as the measure of all things(anthropocentrism), to the measure of all things independent of man (operationalism)

    Ideology refers only to the tools of political influence in the democratic age, and rquires no internal or external consistency, only the ability to motivate people.

    The spectrum of methods of reasoning (“truth”)
    Operationalism (computation from first principles)
    Science (falsification, calculus)
    Empiricism (observables, naturalism)
    Rationalism (reason and naturalism)
    Natural Philosophy (external correspondence, naturalism)
    Logic (verbal/textual, induction)
    Philosophy (resoning, preference, truth)
    Theology
    Mythology
    Anthropocentrism
    Embodiment

    The Spectrum of Fictionalisms (“Deception”)
    Physical: Magic -> Pseudoscience
    Calculative: Gambling (Baiting) -> Mathiness (innumeracy)
    Verbal: Sophistry -> Philosophy
    Imaginary: Occult -> Theological
    Emotional: Agitation -> Ideology
    Overloading: Loading,framing,obscuring -> Lying
    Obstruction: Denialism (denial) -> Reversal (reversal, projection)

    There you go.
    no more lies.

    Reply addressees: @MaxiMEDiocrity @JarrodBlack19 @GadSaad @gadsadd


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-28 02:00:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718085412004970496

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718078270283903486

  • من الصعب ترجمة أعمالي إلى اللغة العربية. 🙁

    من الصعب ترجمة أعمالي إلى اللغة العربية. 🙁


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-26 20:10:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717634855683416427

    Reply addressees: @akazenmind

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717625114454274495

  • RT @NatLawInstitute: @BOB37702515 @curtdoolittle I was appealing to what’s an es

    RT @NatLawInstitute: @BOB37702515 @curtdoolittle I was appealing to what’s an established saying without care for precision. In fact, those…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 18:54:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717253305707933835

  • PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture” (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v. (the generalizati

    PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture”
    (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v.
    (the generalization of homesteading)

    (re: contra kinsella 2)
    Kinsella uses the libertarian term “original appropriation” which says nothing other than an action that one seeks to bring a thing under his control and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 01:36:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716992123457745222

  • PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture” (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v. (the generalizati

    PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture”
    (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v.
    (the generalization of homesteading)

    (re: contra kinsella 2)
    Kinsella uses the libertarian term “original appropriation” which says nothing other than an action that one seeks to bring a thing under his control and out of the control of others”.

    We use the word homesteading which is more appropriate (sic) because it means you’ve invested in an thing over time that was not previously invested in by others.

    Homesteading is the better term – but this might be one of those rare time we need a neologism. 😉

    We need a term that is the equivalent of homesteading that more generalzed and consists of the operational terms by which we bring our control over something into legitimacy by the costs born without impacting the costs born by others. We need to be creative about defining a new term.

    Primovestiture: From “primo” (first) and “investment.”

    Elements of Primovestiture
    Initial Investment: The human action of allocating resources—whether it’s labor, capital, or intellectual effort—to something previously unclaimed or undeveloped.

    Exclusivity: Ensuring that the actor is the first to make the said investment, effectively nullifying the possibility of dual claims over the resource.

    Non-Deprivation: The investment does not produce externalities that would impose costs on others, maintaining a state of Pareto efficiency.

    Utility in Decidability
    Primovestiture offers a criterion for the decidability in disputes over initial claims by providing an axiomatic foundation based on natural law. If an action satisfies the principles of Primovestiture, then it has achieved a state of ethical legitimacy and should be universally preferable within a given legal system. It also dovetails with performative truth, as the action itself, when conducted under the constraints of Primovestiture, reveals a truth about the legitimacy of ownership.

    Cross-disciplinary Application
    Given your focus on unifying multiple fields under the banner of Natural Law, Primovestiture can serve as

    The concept fills a notable gap in the lexicon of property theory and resource allocation. It essentially entails a generalized form of “homesteading” that extends beyond land and natural resources to include anything that can be controlled or influenced by human action. The focus is on the ethical or legitimate acquisition through initial investment, without creating external costs for others.

    Steps to coining a new term:

    1. Identify Key Components of the Concept
    Initial Investment: You are the first to allocate resources—be it time, effort, or material goods.
    Exclusivity: No one else has previously invested in the object or concept.
    Non-Deprivation: Your investment does not deprive or cost others.

    2. Consult Existing Terminology
    Terms like “usufruct,” “first appropriation,” and “stakeholding” might provide inspiration but aren’t adequate to capture your concept entirely.

    3. Experiment with Word Creation
    Primovestiture: From “primo” (first) and “investment.”

    4. Assess the Term for Clarity and Applicability
    The term should be self-explanatory to some degree.
    It should be broad enough to apply to various contexts, from natural resources to intellectual property to social and economic capital.

    5. Introduce the Term in Academic and Professional Circles
    A white paper or academic article that outlines the theoretical framework can serve as an introduction.

    I don’t think much of academia but this might be one of those cases where it’s useful.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 01:36:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716992123151499264