—“Why do we speak in actions, and nothing but actions? Speaking in actions is sufficient for rigorous communication (preserves constant relations). But also, rigorous communication necessitates speaking in actions because we discern through actions.”— Propertarian Frank
Theme: Grammar
-
“Why do we speak in actions, and nothing but actions? Speaking in actions is suf
—“Why do we speak in actions, and nothing but actions? Speaking in actions is sufficient for rigorous communication (preserves constant relations). But also, rigorous communication necessitates speaking in actions because we discern through actions.”— Propertarian Frank -
“Why do we speak in actions, and nothing but actions? Speaking in actions is suf
—“Why do we speak in actions, and nothing but actions? Speaking in actions is sufficient for rigorous communication (preserves constant relations). But also, rigorous communication necessitates speaking in actions because we discern through actions.”— Propertarian Frank
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 20:21:00 UTC
-
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names,
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names, preserves constant relations, since only constant relations are expressible in the grammar of mathematics: the grammar of positional names. -
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names,
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names, preserves constant relations, since only constant relations are expressible in the grammar of mathematics: the grammar of positional names. -
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names,
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names, preserves constant relations, since only constant relations are expressible in the grammar of mathematics: the grammar of positional names.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:48:00 UTC
-
Well, I would say that the difference between epistemology and ontology as it is
Well, I would say that the difference between epistemology and ontology as it is used, is the difference between truth and meaning. Ontologies are arbitrary, but epistemology is a product of the hierarchy of constant relations of the universe. To state it prosecutorially, I would say that epistemology produces a testimonial ontology, and that all other ontologies are merely fictionalisms. -
Well, I would say that the difference between epistemology and ontology as it is
Well, I would say that the difference between epistemology and ontology as it is used, is the difference between truth and meaning. Ontologies are arbitrary, but epistemology is a product of the hierarchy of constant relations of the universe. To state it prosecutorially, I would say that epistemology produces a testimonial ontology, and that all other ontologies are merely fictionalisms. -
Well, I would say that the difference between epistemology and ontology as it is
Well, I would say that the difference between epistemology and ontology as it is used, is the difference between truth and meaning.
Ontologies are arbitrary, but epistemology is a product of the hierarchy of constant relations of the universe.
To state it prosecutorially, I would say that epistemology produces a testimonial ontology, and that all other ontologies are merely fictionalisms.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:23:00 UTC
-
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names,
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names, preserves constant relations, since only constant relations are expressible. In language we can engage in all sorts of association by non constant relations. By speaking in actions we speak in constant relations. It has taken me far too long to simplify it down to something that digestible.