Theme: Grammar

  • The Ignorances Of The Genders

    You know, it’s common knowledge that women communicate in a language with semantics unavailable to men, and that the female mind is impenetrable to man. But it is not common knowledge that Did you ever notice that when a woman talks to a man she has to change her language? I don’t know if they consider it dumbing down, but they speak like they do Did you ever notice that when a man talks to a woman he interprets it as ‘dumbing down’? Did you ever notice that when a man walks into a room of women talking, they immediately change body language, behavior, and speech? Did you ever notice that when a woman walks into a room of men talking they immediately change their body language, behavior and speech? Always and everywhere. Despite a relationship with what I consider one of the smarter or smartest women in technology, I have never met a woman I could talk to who possessed the what I would call the spatial-theoretical (predictive or modeling) capacity of man. I have met gay men who can largely interpret the language of women. And sometimes I think gay men have the advantage if they have the intelligence, of understanding both sides, and gay women understanding neither. The only way I know how to test this is interpersonally by continuously expanding the scope of an idea that the person is familiar with to their limits. Men have much higher limits – OR they are unafraid to transgress their limits. I am not sure which, but I think that might be the answer, and I have no way of testing that – although it should be testable. We are both ignorant of the minds of the others. Women are shallower than the aspie men, and aspies tend to be nearly unlimited theoretically, and I am relatively sure that the same cognition that prevents women from violating NAXALT and violating groupthink, keeps them out of theory. Which is why women contribute almost nothing to theory that is true (feminism is a great example) but that women DO produce empirical work of high quality – especially about humans or the physical world. In other words, women are limited at great scale by their integration. And we are limited at local scale by our lack of it.
  • (i have no idea why, but I am on a roll lately….. must have internalized the g

    (i have no idea why, but I am on a roll lately….. must have internalized the grammar research phase.)
  • (i have no idea why, but I am on a roll lately….. must have internalized the g

    (i have no idea why, but I am on a roll lately….. must have internalized the grammar research phase.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 11:17:00 UTC

  • (i have no idea why, but I am on a roll lately….. must have internalized the g

    (i have no idea why, but I am on a roll lately….. must have internalized the grammar research phase.)
  • Humor is indeed a science, and we can explain it scientifically. It’s been done.

    Humor is indeed a science, and we can explain it scientifically. It’s been done. Just as narrative arcs are constrained by a grammar and semantics, so is humor – to particular rules. Outside of which humor fails. Unfortunately, like all narrative arcs, it’s class dependent.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 01:23:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954524784817266688

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954522808125603840


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954522808125603840

  • Because you lack the agency to discipline your emotions, such that ratio-scienti

    Because you lack the agency to discipline your emotions, such that ratio-scientific discourse is possible.

    Psychology and Sociology consist of a grammar and semantics of shaming. Thats all. A means of using the threat of ostracization as a means of imposing conformity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 00:56:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954517866056966149

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600

  • “Uhhh? I happen to like psychology/sociology”— I know you do because it is the

    —“Uhhh? I happen to like psychology/sociology”—

    I know you do because it is the grammar and semantics of using disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and rallying for the purpose of defending a fraud you desperately seek to preserve.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 00:55:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954517747114958849

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600

  • Different classes use different forms vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation, judgem

    Different classes use different forms vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation, judgement and humor. Pls don’t continue to reinforce my argument for me. 😉 You only demonstrate it further with any retort.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 23:27:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954495605908402176

    Reply addressees: @hysellaz @Aintezbncheez @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954426991087947777


    IN REPLY TO:

    @hysellaz

    @curtdoolittle @Aintezbncheez @TheView Didn’t come across as humor

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954426991087947777

  • Humor is indeed a science, and we can explain it scientifically. It’s been done.

    Humor is indeed a science, and we can explain it scientifically. It’s been done. Just as narrative arcs are constrained by a grammar and semantics, so is humor – to particular rules. Outside of which humor fails. Unfortunately, like all narrative arcs, it’s class dependent. You know, you can learn a lot playing verbal tennis with me. Most people do. Or… well, most people with more than room temperature IQ’s do…. Humor is an exceptional means of educating those lacking agency to pursue truth alone. loz
  • Humor is indeed a science, and we can explain it scientifically. It’s been done.

    Humor is indeed a science, and we can explain it scientifically. It’s been done. Just as narrative arcs are constrained by a grammar and semantics, so is humor – to particular rules. Outside of which humor fails. Unfortunately, like all narrative arcs, it’s class dependent.

    You know, you can learn a lot playing verbal tennis with me. Most people do. Or… well, most people with more than room temperature IQ’s do…. Humor is an exceptional means of educating those lacking agency to pursue truth alone.

    loz


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 20:25:00 UTC