Curt Doolittle

Theme: Grammar

  • I have spent the last three months on our product because honestly, working on ‘

    I have spent the last three months on our product because honestly, working on ‘grammar’ last fall burned me out. I”m starting to get itchy again. So I’ll probably start splitting my time soon. -hugs man.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:15:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973699113282883584

    Reply addressees: @Hevsa1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973669400812306432

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Hevsa1

    @curtdoolittle How’s the book going? *eager*

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973669400812306432

  • East asians not only have verb based language rather than noun, and conformity(h

    East asians not only have verb based language rather than noun, and conformity(harmony) and non-imposition against the dominance hierarchy, but they failed to solve the problem of politics, and still practice face and continuous deception. It is very hard to compare us.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 18:18:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973624260051816448

    Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376

  • “Philosophical language then is a dead language, and perhaps an immoral one – an

    —“Philosophical language then is a dead language, and perhaps an immoral one – and rationalism a dead technology. And they will be incrementally combined institutionally and normatively into theology, with Literary Philosophy(Plato and his heirs), merely representing it’s position on the spectrum of Aristotelian/Stoic/Roman/English Law (science), Confucian Reason, French Literary Idealism, Platonic Rational Idealism, Continental and Augustinian Fictionalism, and Abrahamic and Zoroastrian Fictionalism.”—

    ie: there aren’t any.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-11 17:50:00 UTC

  • TEAPOTS This is a trivial problem in grammar with the terms truth and proof and

    TEAPOTS

    This is a trivial problem in grammar with the terms truth and proof and can be debunked pretty easily.

    a) how can you testify that a teapot orbits the sun?

    This is a very different question than Russell is asking and is the entire reason why philosophy and theology became closely related after because of augustine.

    We demand warranty of goods and services, but we have stopped demanding warranty of information (words).

    So the question is, how can one warranty his statement that a teapot orbits the sun?

    Then why does he say such a thing? In other words, just as in any other crime, what is one’s incentive?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-11 11:40:00 UTC

  • Teapots

    This is a trivial problem in grammar with the terms truth and proof and can be debunked pretty easily. a) how can you testify that a teapot orbits the sun? This is a very different question than Russell is asking and is the entire reason why philosophy and theology became closely related after because of augustine. We demand warranty of goods and services, but we have stopped demanding warranty of information (words). So the question is, how can one warranty his statement that a teapot orbits the sun? Then why does he say such a thing? In other words, just as in any other crime, what is one’s incentive?

  • Teapots

    This is a trivial problem in grammar with the terms truth and proof and can be debunked pretty easily. a) how can you testify that a teapot orbits the sun? This is a very different question than Russell is asking and is the entire reason why philosophy and theology became closely related after because of augustine. We demand warranty of goods and services, but we have stopped demanding warranty of information (words). So the question is, how can one warranty his statement that a teapot orbits the sun? Then why does he say such a thing? In other words, just as in any other crime, what is one’s incentive?

  • If you are going to deviate from operational language, then you must have a reas

    If you are going to deviate from operational language, then you must have a reason for doing so that is other than an attempt to fictionalize.

    So far, I can’t find any case in which the individual isn’t engaging in fictionalism or deception.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-08 21:43:00 UTC

  • If you are going to deviate from operational language, then you must have a reas

    If you are going to deviate from operational language, then you must have a reason for doing so that is other than an attempt to fictionalize. So far, I can’t find any case in which the individual isn’t engaging in fictionalism or deception.

  • If you are going to deviate from operational language, then you must have a reas

    If you are going to deviate from operational language, then you must have a reason for doing so that is other than an attempt to fictionalize. So far, I can’t find any case in which the individual isn’t engaging in fictionalism or deception.

  • Truth is a matter of law, and the grammars we call logics, mathematics, science,

    Truth is a matter of law, and the grammars we call logics, mathematics, science, description, and narrative only assist us in the process of creating associations, and then the process of disambiguation and deflation so that we can then eliminate ignorance error bias and deciet.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-07 02:13:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971207126558363648

    Reply addressees: @No2Sovereignty @HeritageNLegacy @LueYee @JWilliamXIII

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971132257393041408

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971132257393041408