Logics are deflationary grammars so that we can test ourselves. They are very limited languages with very strict grammars and semantics. They serve as means of falsification. Stories allow us to search for opportunities. Via-positiva stories (meaning) vs via-negativa logics (falsification) and the truth is what survives the competition.
Theme: Grammar
-
The Poverty of Evolas Sophisms and Moralisms
Trying to find Evola quotes that contain any material content is searching for needles in haystacks. I can find some. But not many. Why? He cannot define the words he uses. So he is relying upon suggestion and demand for substitution by the reader. The reader, providing that substitution, is therefore is firmly convinced that Evola evokes the reader’s agreement, when instead, Evola evokes only the act of agreement with one’s self, and the illusion that Evola shares that sentiment.
-
The Poverty of Evolas Sophisms and Moralisms
Trying to find Evola quotes that contain any material content is searching for needles in haystacks. I can find some. But not many. Why? He cannot define the words he uses. So he is relying upon suggestion and demand for substitution by the reader. The reader, providing that substitution, is therefore is firmly convinced that Evola evokes the reader’s agreement, when instead, Evola evokes only the act of agreement with one’s self, and the illusion that Evola shares that sentiment.
-
(This is where I got the insight into grammars from)
(This is where I got the insight into grammars from)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 09:40:00 UTC
-
MISUSE OF GRAMMARS (FRAUDS)
MISUSE OF GRAMMARS (FRAUDS)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 09:28:00 UTC
-
THE GRAMMARS
THE GRAMMARS
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 09:28:00 UTC
-
THE DEFLATIONARY GRAMMARS —“Perception -> deconflation -> finding a unit of me
THE DEFLATIONARY GRAMMARS
—“Perception -> deconflation -> finding a unit of measure -> finding commensurability. Breakthroughs occur when commensurability between disparate domains are discovered, which then gives rise to better measures. Discovering the common relation reveals commensurable measure. Operational epistemology focusses on relations as primary and identity/domains as secondary (or contingent).”—Bill Joslin
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 09:26:00 UTC
-
THE COMPETITION BETWEEN POSITIVA AND NEGATIVA Logics are deflationary grammars s
THE COMPETITION BETWEEN POSITIVA AND NEGATIVA
Logics are deflationary grammars so that we can test ourselves. They are very limited languages with very strict grammars and semantics. They serve as means of falsification.
Stories allow us to search for opportunities.
Via-positiva stories (meaning) vs via-negativa logics (falsification) and the truth is what survives the competition.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 08:00:00 UTC
-
The Failure of Paradigms (ways of Thinking)
There is a reason the world is continuously coalescing to the vocabulary and grammars of science: and that is because of the commensurability and therefore falsificationary value of the single most parsimonious vocabulary and grammar consisting entirely of continuous relations from the very small below human scale, through to human scale, to the very large beyond human scale – the semantics of which consist of analogies to observable experience: human scale. Any idiot can come up with a paradigm that provides some sort of explanatory power, in the same way that a fairy tale, legend, or mythos provides explanatory power: by analogy. And idiots come up with new paradigms all the time, in an effort to elucidate some set of relations or other. And the they congratulate themselves on their insight and next seek to preserve that insight by justification: a forever-failing attempt to find a way for the rest of human knowledge to fit that paradigm. They over-invest. They fail. It is quite different to start with an attempt to discover the grammar and semantics of science itself, and with that ambition to correct the minor incompatibilities between the arts and sciences, thereby increasing commensurability and falsifiability across all arts and sciences – producing a universal grammar and semantics and as such rendering all human knowledge more parsimonious and synthetic.
-
The Failure of Paradigms (ways of Thinking)
There is a reason the world is continuously coalescing to the vocabulary and grammars of science: and that is because of the commensurability and therefore falsificationary value of the single most parsimonious vocabulary and grammar consisting entirely of continuous relations from the very small below human scale, through to human scale, to the very large beyond human scale – the semantics of which consist of analogies to observable experience: human scale. Any idiot can come up with a paradigm that provides some sort of explanatory power, in the same way that a fairy tale, legend, or mythos provides explanatory power: by analogy. And idiots come up with new paradigms all the time, in an effort to elucidate some set of relations or other. And the they congratulate themselves on their insight and next seek to preserve that insight by justification: a forever-failing attempt to find a way for the rest of human knowledge to fit that paradigm. They over-invest. They fail. It is quite different to start with an attempt to discover the grammar and semantics of science itself, and with that ambition to correct the minor incompatibilities between the arts and sciences, thereby increasing commensurability and falsifiability across all arts and sciences – producing a universal grammar and semantics and as such rendering all human knowledge more parsimonious and synthetic.