Theme: Grammar

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @DRolandAnderson @Heimdallralfadr The proper saying is indeed

    RT @curtdoolittle: @DRolandAnderson @Heimdallralfadr The proper saying is indeed “Hear, hear!” and not “Here, here!”

    “Hear, hear!” is an e…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-03 15:47:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775550791396270271

  • The proper saying is indeed “Hear, hear!” and not “Here, here!” “Hear, hear!” is

    The proper saying is indeed “Hear, hear!” and not “Here, here!”

    “Hear, hear!” is an expression used to show agreement with a statement made by a speaker, essentially short for “Hear him/her!” It is often used in formal settings, such as in parliament or at public speeches, to indicate approval or support for the point being made.

    The phrase originated in the British Parliament, where it was used as a shortened form of “Hear ye, hear ye,” which was a call for attention or a command to listen.

    In contrast, “Here, here!” is a common misinterpretation or misspelling of the original phrase, likely due to the similar pronunciation of “hear” and “here.” While it’s a common mistake, “Here, here!” does not carry the same meaning as the original expression.

    Reply addressees: @DRolandAnderson @Heimdallralfadr


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-03 15:45:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775550273013817345

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775549134122201248

  • I don’t know you well enough to push back on this question but I’ll assume you’r

    I don’t know you well enough to push back on this question but I’ll assume you’re intellectually honest. 😉
    (a) this question is rather odd (illogical), since, when saying the set X is (cumulatively) anti-intellectual, members of tthe set, whenever human, vary dramatically from the commonality of the mean to the extreme outliers at the tails of the curve. (b) Is he intellectual compared to Aristotle, Seneca, Aurelius? No. Is he producing a thought product for the same purpose? Yes. And was it influential? Yes.

    Reply addressees: @SirSmokesAaLot @BOB37702515


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-31 18:52:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774510158095237121

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774507899936469219

  • @Plinz, poetically stated, and I would have used ‘decidability’ instead of ‘cons

    @Plinz, poetically stated, and I would have used ‘decidability’ instead of ‘consensus’ to avoid anthropomorphism of competing networks, but yes, ‘consensus’ would frame it with explanatory power.

    … Auto association > Prediction > Competition > Attention (State) > Recursion…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-31 12:46:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774417930500932024

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774245828372451689

  • I don’t use number systems, either cardinal or ordinal for natural orders. I use

    I don’t use number systems, either cardinal or ordinal for natural orders. I use operational names. However if you have some suggestions I’d invest time in considering it?

    I should probably explain that numbers are useful for weights of relations (vectors), and we certainly could use numbers as arbitrary but unique names for both sums (points) and relations (vectors). But at that point, as arbitrary unique names, they are no longer ‘numbers’ per say, as both names, positional names, and values, but only names, without further positional or value content. (which is very Cantorian, really. 😉 )

    Reply addressees: @JohannNetram


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-30 21:53:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774193204264337408

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774142205571031257

  • Hmm… it’s an idiom “calling a deer a horse” meaning “deliberate peddling of a

    Hmm… it’s an idiom “calling a deer a horse” meaning “deliberate peddling of a falsehood”. The english equivalent is uncommon but far less poetic: “calling black white.” The english is a very literal or analytic expression just as the chinese is a very literary or poetic expression. Typical of both cultures. So there is more ‘meaning’ in the chinese (literary, poetic) version. A great example of chinese low precision high context, vs english low context high precision language.

    Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00 @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-30 04:05:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773924499097886720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773921843805864175

  • A prime number is a natural number greater than 1 that is only divisible by 1 an

    A prime number is a natural number greater than 1 that is only divisible by 1 and itself. This fundamental definition does not change with the base of the number system. Yet, the representation of prime numbers does change in different bases. For example, in base 10, the number 17 is prime, and it is written as “17”. In base 2 (binary), the same number is written as “10001”, and in base 16 (hexadecimal), it is written as “11”.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-28 19:33:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773433173814231040

  • FEMININE LEFTIST DECEIT: RETROACTIVE CONTINUITY, “RETCON”, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION,

    FEMININE LEFTIST DECEIT: RETROACTIVE CONTINUITY, “RETCON”, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION, AND SEMANTIC MANIPULATION

    Retroactive continuity, or retcon for short, is rhetorical to deceptive to fraudulent device in which facts that have been established through the evidence, essay, and narrative are adjusted, ignored, supplemented, or contradicted such that it recontextualizes or breaks continuity with the former.

    Such RETCONNING in Social Construction under postmodernism as the attempt to decrease correspondence with empiricism and increase correspondence with ideology.

    Social Construction:
    Social constructionism, particularly as expressed in postmodernist thought, amounts to a deliberate attempt to erode the primacy of empirical evidence and objective truth in favor of relativistic ideological narratives. By asserting that reality is primarily a product of social and cultural context rather than observable facts, social constructionists can justify and promote ideological agendas under the guise of academic inquiry. In this view, the claim that knowledge is ‘socially constructed’ is a way to decrease correspondence with empiricism and increase correspondence with ideology – essentially a rhetorical strategy for privileging certain political and philosophical commitments over dispassionate, evidence-based analysis.”

    Semantic Shift, Manipulation, or Engineering
    refers to the phenomenon where the meaning of a word changes over time, often due to social, cultural, or political factors.

    There are several types of semantic change:
    Broadening: When a word’s meaning becomes more inclusive or general over time.
    Narrowing: When a word’s meaning becomes more specific or restricted over time.
    Amelioration: When a word’s meaning becomes more positive over time.
    Pejoration: When a word’s meaning becomes more negative over time.
    Semantic drift: When a word’s meaning gradually shifts in a different direction over time.
    In the case of “liberal,” the term has undergone a semantic shift, particularly in the United States, where it has come to be associated with left-leaning or progressive political ideologies, rather than its original meaning related to classical liberalism, which emphasized individual rights, free markets, and limited government intervention.

    The intentional manipulation of a term’s meaning for political or ideological purposes could also be described as “semantic manipulation” or “semantic engineering.”


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-28 19:17:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773429103196082176

  • RL: Suggested Thinking: I’ve learned to understand these differences (Homer, vs

    RL: Suggested Thinking:
    I’ve learned to understand these differences (Homer, vs Plato, vs Aristotle as systems of measurement (or understanding) consisting of paradigms of permissible dimensions, vocabularies, logic and grammar and the Aristotle/Plato division as an insufficient dichotomy in an insufficient spectrum:
    … 1. Inflationary (Theology, Wisdom), (One way) Homer
    … 2. Conflationary (Philosophy, Reason), (Bridge) Plato
    … 3. and Deflationary (Empiricism, testimony) (Many Ways) Aristotle

    So This Spectrum Is Available To Man:
    Sensation > Embodiment > Proprioception > World Prediction > Self Prediction > Other Prediction > imitation-sympathy-empathy > Language > anthropomorphism > mythology > religion > theology > philosophy and reason > logic and rationalism > science and empiricism and mathematics > first principles, construction, and computation > bayesian accounting > mechanical prediction > (recursion). (See: https://t.co/b9zyOB7whc)

    The Spectrum of Measurements
    In other words,
    1 – Increasing falsification of imagination, intuition and instinct vs increasing justification(satisfaction) of imagination, intuition, and instinct.
    2 – Increasing abstraction (mechanization, disambiguation) vs Increasing anthropomorphism(experience, conflation)
    3 – Increasing precision from which additional logical deduction is possible vs decreasing precision from which broader association is possible.

    The Spectrum of Agency in Mind
    This follows the evolution of the mind by the increase in volume of memory, and the hierarchy of memory from sensation to the prefrontal cortex.

    Cognitive Processes:
    Sensation > disambiguation > organization > association > valuation > Instinct > Intuition(spirit) > imagination (mind) > daydreaming (undirected) > thinking (directing) > reasoning (wayfinding) > calculating (inputs into outputs) > computing (using external tools such as writing and numbers etc)

    The Reason for the Choice?
    So, instead I would say, how much do you WANT or NEED to intuit and feel (the spirit) vs how much to you want or need to ACT upon (mind and reason)?

    So are you favoring devotion to experience (internal) or to action (external) and is this difference a choice, a strength, or a weakness?

    Hugs as always.

    Curt

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-27 15:36:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773011284780269568

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772866469027602780

  • It’s true in the germanic languages for sure

    It’s true in the germanic languages for sure.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-26 17:57:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772684230947959192

    Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772360992741105875


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    —“No society is so stable that underclass reproduction becomes a positive thing.”— @NoahRevoy

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1772360992741105875