Curt Doolittle

Theme: Grammar

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553442870 Timestamp) THE SERIES OF GRAMMARS PSYCHOLOGY (important) (read this) —“is there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).”— Gerard I think that it is always better to use this series:

    1. Means: Personality traits and reward systems. (anglo/physical)

    2. Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)

    3. Training: Stoicism (Acquisition of virtues by CBT)

    4 Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)

    1. Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)

    This series begins with the most precise but least experiential and moves to the least precise but must experiential. Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list. This series is as important as: 1. The hierarchy of Measurements (mathematics) 2. The hierarchy of States of Matter (physical science) 3. The hierarchy of Grammars (language) 4. The hierarchy of Knowledge (aristotelian categories)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553400682 Timestamp) ummm.. language consists of a stream of continuous recursive disambiguation consisting of what we would call stories of changes in state, culminating in a series 1.comprehension, 2.agreement/disagreement, 3.warranty of due diligence. (limiting) When you say ‘declarative’ i use the term more common in the philosophy of science ‘promissory’, and when duly diligent ‘testimonial’. So your term ‘declarative’ means opinion, the mainstream considers it promissory, and I consider it testimonial. The difference between these three claims is demand. Language satisfies DEMAND for INFALLIBILITY in the given circumstance. THe market for due diligence increases as externalities to the speech increase. This is demonstrated everywhere in all walks of life. It’s not an opinion it’s the evidence.

  • (FB 1553462693 Timestamp) UM. I DON’T JUDGE PEOPLE’S DISCOURSE BY THEIR SEXUAL P

    (FB 1553462693 Timestamp) UM. I DON’T JUDGE PEOPLE’S DISCOURSE BY THEIR SEXUAL PREFERENCE, JUST QUALITY OF ARGUMENT – AND YOU WON’T MAKE ME. SORRY.
    If they don’t make it my issue it’s not an issue for me. And that says nothing about my heterosexuality, and everything about my work and teaching. So don’t try insulting me. I’m immune. (damn. female stalkers are the worst.) (from twitter)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553446616 Timestamp) —“Because it’s hard to see what isn’t labelled.”— Michael D. Abbott. The correct term is ‘named’. –“If you can name a thing, you can destroy at thing”– This quote in many forms is one of the oldest ideas in the western tradition. it is where our ‘spells’ come from. its origin is in metallurgy. Knowledge directs power.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553443464 Timestamp) —“Not sure “continuous recursive disambiguation” really clarifies anything!”—Dennis Spain You probably don’t know how to write software, haven’t read turing, nor chomsky, because that’s what ‘language’ means. Continuous (a stream of sounds), recursive (passing ‘state’ – you might think of this incorrectly as ‘accumulating’), disambiguation (removing error). Just as science is falsificationary, language is falsificationary. Sounds in a stream should result in continuous decreases in ambiguity until the point at which we establish a context, a contract for meaning, and a warranty of due diligence limiting that meaning. Which is what a ‘grammar’ means: Rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. (Turing > Chomsky) + (Weber > Mises > Rothbard > Hoppe) + (Hayek) -> Doolittle

  • (FB 1553462693 Timestamp) UM. I DON’T JUDGE PEOPLE’S DISCOURSE BY THEIR SEXUAL P

    (FB 1553462693 Timestamp) UM. I DON’T JUDGE PEOPLE’S DISCOURSE BY THEIR SEXUAL PREFERENCE, JUST QUALITY OF ARGUMENT – AND YOU WON’T MAKE ME. SORRY.
    If they don’t make it my issue it’s not an issue for me. And that says nothing about my heterosexuality, and everything about my work and teaching. So don’t try insulting me. I’m immune. (damn. female stalkers are the worst.) (from twitter)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553446616 Timestamp) —“Because it’s hard to see what isn’t labelled.”— Michael D. Abbott. The correct term is ‘named’. –“If you can name a thing, you can destroy at thing”– This quote in many forms is one of the oldest ideas in the western tradition. it is where our ‘spells’ come from. its origin is in metallurgy. Knowledge directs power.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553443464 Timestamp) —“Not sure “continuous recursive disambiguation” really clarifies anything!”—Dennis Spain You probably don’t know how to write software, haven’t read turing, nor chomsky, because that’s what ‘language’ means. Continuous (a stream of sounds), recursive (passing ‘state’ – you might think of this incorrectly as ‘accumulating’), disambiguation (removing error). Just as science is falsificationary, language is falsificationary. Sounds in a stream should result in continuous decreases in ambiguity until the point at which we establish a context, a contract for meaning, and a warranty of due diligence limiting that meaning. Which is what a ‘grammar’ means: Rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. (Turing > Chomsky) + (Weber > Mises > Rothbard > Hoppe) + (Hayek) -> Doolittle

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553522607 Timestamp) TRINITIES, TRIPLETS, SERIES AND SPECTRA? —“Propertarians taking trinities seriously again. 😉 “—Brandon Hayes —“Easiest way to get over the left and right linear spectrum false dichotomy is to have a 3 point natural perception.”—Jeffery Gog Magog Hughes WHY? “it takes three points to test a line” “it takes three points (terms) to disambiguate a spectrum” “it takes three points (terms) to define lower bound, median, and upper bound. Once we have three points we can add precision between them without ambiguity that causes and permits conflation and therefore false inference from premises. Thats why

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553522607 Timestamp) TRINITIES, TRIPLETS, SERIES AND SPECTRA? —“Propertarians taking trinities seriously again. 😉 “—Brandon Hayes —“Easiest way to get over the left and right linear spectrum false dichotomy is to have a 3 point natural perception.”—Jeffery Gog Magog Hughes WHY? “it takes three points to test a line” “it takes three points (terms) to disambiguate a spectrum” “it takes three points (terms) to define lower bound, median, and upper bound. Once we have three points we can add precision between them without ambiguity that causes and permits conflation and therefore false inference from premises. Thats why