RT @ItIsHoeMath: It helps to divide people into 3 classes of intelligence:
1: Doesn’t understand what words mean.
2: Thinks the words ARE…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-12 18:51:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800964225688281245
RT @ItIsHoeMath: It helps to divide people into 3 classes of intelligence:
1: Doesn’t understand what words mean.
2: Thinks the words ARE…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-12 18:51:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800964225688281245
Well he doesn’t understand it. We do know how they work. I think he doesn’t understand universal grammar so it’s getting by him.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-11 23:14:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800667854473400325
Reply addressees: @DwightExMachina
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800633125090865199
I’m not sure what point you’re making.
Story is the most general term:
Phoneme, Morpheme, Syllable, Word, Phrase, Clause, Sentence, Paragraph, Passage, Section, Chapter, Story, Anthology, Collection, Compendium, Library.
Metaphysics is what I was referring to
Yes epistemology becuase of it.
Terms (dimensions) because of both.
Logical rules because of all three.
Grammatical rules are the same though to ‘get away’ with suggestion and deception certain rules are ignored or evaded (verb to be, causality, responsibility).
Fundamentally it’s all geometry (dimensions and manifold) Which is why today’s AIs work as they do.
Technically speaking the paradigms (metaphysics (presumptions), epistemology (constraints), logic (identity, consistency coherence), terms (referents), grammar (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation)) are deterministic given what premises one begins with.
Hence the full spectrum of:
embodiment > anthropomorphism > mythology(counting) > theology(arithmetic) > philosophy(Logic, Geometry) > empiricism(calculus) > science (instrumentation) > computation(simulation, operationalism).
Each in that sequence increases the demands on metaphysics, epistemology, logic, terms, and of course, precision A well a sw hat one can claim is true.
Reply addressees: @CulturalBystand @SRCHicks
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-11 04:50:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800390226365349888
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800384127528804523
Kate, I can usually translate your ruminations, and I don’t know what others think, but there is usually some insight or other buried in there somewhere. But the message isn’t coming across here. Can you try again and propose a contrast?
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-10 22:32:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800295036007186712
Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800284839662252102
I’m sorry to be an effete snob and pop culture illiterate but what does “I hate that this is next-level evergreen tweet territory” mean in reference to an ironic prediction of the future?
CLAUDE:
No need to apologize! The phrase “I hate that this is next-level evergreen tweet territory” is a bit of modern internet slang, so let’s break it down:
“Evergreen” in this context refers to content that remains relevant and often resurfaces long after it was originally created. This is often because the content is either timeless or because it accurately predicted something that came to pass.
A “tweet” is a post on the social media platform Twitter.
“Next-level” is a way of saying that something is extremely or remarkably so, beyond the usual level.
“I hate that…” is a colloquial way of acknowledging something as true or accurate, even if it’s uncomfortable or you wish it weren’t the case.
So, when someone says “I hate that this is next-level evergreen tweet territory” about an ironic prediction of the future, they’re expressing that they believe the prediction is so accurate that the original post or “tweet” will likely be shared and resurface far into the future, continuing to be relevant long after it was first made. The “I hate that…” part suggests they find the prediction unsettling or they wish it weren’t true, even as they acknowledge its accuracy.
It’s a way of saying “This prediction is so spot-on that people will probably keep referring back to it for a long time, and I don’t like what that says about where things are headed.”
Reply addressees: @QuinnyPig
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 17:16:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798765895336251398
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798052984678740416
If you’re educated (properly) you follow the original French pronunciation of “neesh”. If you’re uneducated you follow the colloquial american ‘nitch’ – which originates in phonetically pronouncing the text, rather than, as in most words incorporated into english, pronouncing in…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 05:56:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798594732509016375
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797570963636138447
“Continuous recursive adversarial disambiguation”
It’s not only the logic of grammar, but of all planning and actions, and of all of evolution, all the way down to whatever causes the quantum background. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 13:17:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797980921527685122
“Continuous recursive adversarial disambiguation”
It’s not only the logic of grammar, but of all planning and actions, and of all of evolution, all the way down to whatever causes the quantum background. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 13:17:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797980921590587823
Reply addressees: @abenitezburraco
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797938310343704767
You must not read much in the way of academic prose. Worth reading is the dumbing down of language in response to the difficulty of training soldiers in the world wars, compared to pre-war written text whether by hand or in print. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 13:10:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797979243135303700
Reply addressees: @timgill924 @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797863653368287446
Living working and studying in both world subconsciously causes a little overlap – and in some cases because I intuit the british is more correct, particularly when it involves french roots.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 10:13:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797934708271227248
Reply addressees: @Great_Wh1te
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797892846483374381