IT MATTERS: DISAMBIGUATION, SERIALIZATION, OPERATIONALIZATION (and competition)
—“Good format”— @AHayhes
(In response to serialization of properties of religion)
P-method of “Disambiguation, Serialization, Operationalization”.
Popper didn’t quite get there. Programming and databases (relational calculus) got me there.
Some of us are better at it (pattern recognition, systematizing) and others need hand holding (narrative).
Both are required.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 11:36:00 UTC
And yes, most of it is the vocabulary and particularly the vocabulary in series format.Once you get it’s a system of measurement, and a logic like any other, it starts fitting together. Some of the guys are getting better than I am now in some parts of it. You will too. I see it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 19:02:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187081825736372226
Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187081484726878208
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@fryskefilosoof Well, you’re asking for help in the best way possible. 😉 I’ll help you however I can. Yes the learning curve is steep but the value of “OMG now I get THIS TOO!!’ experience never ends. Ask Bill. It really is like the scientific revolution for psychology, sociology, politics.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187081484726878208
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@fryskefilosoof Well, you’re asking for help in the best way possible. 😉 I’ll help you however I can. Yes the learning curve is steep but the value of “OMG now I get THIS TOO!!’ experience never ends. Ask Bill. It really is like the scientific revolution for psychology, sociology, politics.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187081484726878208
(d) Curtis’ prescription is outlined; I wrote a constitution and the strict construction of law, the grammars, testimonialism, and it’s a detailed treatment. (e) I put the blame a little more squarely on the JQ. (d) Otherwise realistically, I don’t think there is much difference.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 00:49:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186806741507420160
Reply addressees: @QuestionMThings
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186805795725463558
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@QuestionMThings …. (c) Curtis emphasizes criticism and writes in continental (empathic, moral, literary) prose or, lets say, ‘imprecise’ language. I write in anglo analytic prose (systematizing, law, analytic) or ‘precise’ language. And P is the largest work produce since the Marx.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186805795725463558
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@QuestionMThings …. (c) Curtis emphasizes criticism and writes in continental (empathic, moral, literary) prose or, lets say, ‘imprecise’ language. I write in anglo analytic prose (systematizing, law, analytic) or ‘precise’ language. And P is the largest work produce since the Marx.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186805795725463558
…. (c) Curtis emphasizes criticism and writes in continental (empathic, moral, literary) prose or, lets say, ‘imprecise’ language. I write in anglo analytic prose (systematizing, law, analytic) or ‘precise’ language. And P is the largest work produce since the Marx.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 00:45:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186805795725463558
Reply addressees: @QuestionMThings
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186804404994875393
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@QuestionMThings True. (a) we don’t think of programming as an invention over the logics, that bridges the gap between empiricism and logic(words) and math(measures). It is. (b) programming and database work are intolerant and teach you to think using these terms. ….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186804404994875393
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@QuestionMThings True. (a) we don’t think of programming as an invention over the logics, that bridges the gap between empiricism and logic(words) and math(measures). It is. (b) programming and database work are intolerant and teach you to think using these terms. ….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186804404994875393
TEST
Disambiguate, Serialize, and Operationalize the term “Wrong”.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 14:11:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186646163040157698
TODAY’S P-QUIZ : “WRONG”
.
Disambiguate, Serialize, and Operationalize the term “Wrong”.
.
1. Collect synonyms and antonyms.
2. Serialize
3. Operationalize
4. State (list) the constant relation(s)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 10:10:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/73007253_491086928154869_232734201776963584_o_491086924821536.jpg TODAY’S FIRST QUIZ: WHAT GOES WITH WHAT?
You’re missing the point. In western aristocratic civilization we ask “How can I make the world a better place, and profit from it, by contributing to it?” Whereas some say the world is a better place for others, how can I get more of it for me? The immoral say only “How can I make make the most profit and survive it?” The foolish say “My world is great, so how can i give it away to others?” And (d) the Enemy Says “How can I make the world a worse place, and profit from it, by undermining it?”
Now which GROUP or CLASS says what?
Let’s expand and list the questions:
a. How can I make it better, and profit from it?
b. How can I get more of it?
c. How can I maximize my take from it?
d. How can I redistribute it to others?
e. How can I profit from making it worse?
Now answer who exercises each strategy?
a) conservatives: aristocratic egalitarian europeans.
b) ?
c) ?
d) ?
e) ?TODAY’S FIRST QUIZ: WHAT GOES WITH WHAT?
You’re missing the point. In western aristocratic civilization we ask “How can I make the world a better place, and profit from it, by contributing to it?” Whereas some say the world is a better place for others, how can I get more of it for me? The immoral say only “How can I make make the most profit and survive it?” The foolish say “My world is great, so how can i give it away to others?” And (d) the Enemy Says “How can I make the world a worse place, and profit from it, by undermining it?”
Now which GROUP or CLASS says what?
Let’s expand and list the questions:
a. How can I make it better, and profit from it?
b. How can I get more of it?
c. How can I maximize my take from it?
d. How can I redistribute it to others?
e. How can I profit from making it worse?
Now answer who exercises each strategy?
a) conservatives: aristocratic egalitarian europeans.
b) ?
c) ?
d) ?
e) ?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 10:10:00 UTC
9) You might think passing tests of truthful speech in court regardless of the context is difficult but once you understand the P-method and particularly the grammars it isn’t hard at all. It’s a checklist. And every item in the checklist is testable before a jury.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 21:08:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186388932193374209
Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186388679096459268
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 8) The net result is preserving free truthful and reciprocal speech while prohibiting false and irreciprocal speech, and restoring the via-negativa market of the law, to mirror the via positiva market for goods, services, information, whether private or common.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186388679096459268
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 8) The net result is preserving free truthful and reciprocal speech while prohibiting false and irreciprocal speech, and restoring the via-negativa market of the law, to mirror the via positiva market for goods, services, information, whether private or common.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186388679096459268
WRITING FICTION AND THE GRAMMARS
I suppose I ought to point out that I treat fiction as one of the “Grammars” in P, and I include the “archetypes, plots, and sentences” (the grammar(logic) of… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=489713778292184&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 19:15:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186360474679595010
NO YOU DON”T HAVE WRITER’S BLOCK – HOW TO WRITE
You can’t write from a feeling – you can’t maintain it. You can’t write from inspiration – it will dissipate.
OR….
You can identify a… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=489648004965428&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 17:30:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186333893756162049