I still have no idea what you’re talking about beause your pronouns don’t match the implications
Reply addressees: @Shahydat @kenationalist_ @MaMo_ @DNy1818
Theme: Grammar
-
I still have no idea what you’re talking about beause your pronouns don’t match
-
I still have no idea what you’re talking about beause your pronouns don’t match
I still have no idea what you’re talking about beause your pronouns don’t match the implications
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-15 16:33:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283439459724406785
Reply addressees: @Shahydat @kenationalist_ @MaMo_ @DNy1818
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283435260500480000
-
RT @Hail__To_You: “…So what we need is a set of grammars that exist, from the
RT @Hail__To_You: “…So what we need is a set of grammars that exist, from the most sentimental to the most calculative so that we address…
-
RT @Hail__To_You: “…So what we need is a set of grammars that exist, from the
RT @Hail__To_You: “…So what we need is a set of grammars that exist, from the most sentimental to the most calculative so that we address…
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-15 14:42:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283411497553661954
-
Physical law: Entropy, Conservation of Energy, etc Formal law: Logics, Grammars,
Physical law: Entropy, Conservation of Energy, etc
Formal law: Logics, Grammars, Algorithms
Natural law: Reciprocity within the limits of proportionality.
Evolutionary Law: Natural Selection in defense against regression to the mean.
They’re the same law – and it doesn’t change
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 -
Physical law: Entropy, Conservation of Energy, etc Formal law: Logics, Grammars,
Physical law: Entropy, Conservation of Energy, etc
Formal law: Logics, Grammars, Algorithms
Natural law: Reciprocity within the limits of proportionality.
Evolutionary Law: Natural Selection in defense against regression to the mean.
They’re the same law – and it doesn’t change
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 21:37:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282428853328187393
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282424444544327685
-
Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference b
Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference between logic, formal logic, operational logic, philosophy, ideology, and theology.
My work is a formal operational logic of jurisprudence, which results iin the formal logic of social science.
Reply addressees: @JackyDawg -
Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference b
Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference between logic, formal logic, operational logic, philosophy, ideology, and theology.
My work is a formal operational logic of jurisprudence, which results iin the formal logic of social science.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 13:46:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282310277699174402
Reply addressees: @JackyDawg
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282309508140634115
-
Do you know what conflation is? Do you know what categorical identity is? The di
Do you know what conflation is? Do you know what categorical identity is? The dissident right has good people in it. We serve the good. We just learned that the bad people do all the talking. And turn on us. And it’s mostly catbois and guys who wet their bed over Adolf photos.
Reply addressees: @Ladyveritas14 @HELPME_IM_OLD -
It relies upon the Abrahamic method. It is structured by the same vocabulary, gr
It relies upon the Abrahamic method. It is structured by the same vocabulary, grammar, and logic of Judaism, Islam, communism, postmodernism, and feminism. It is not structured as are Aristotelian, Confucian, Buddhist, or even Platonism. No man knows this better than I.
Reply addressees: @PaleoEconomist @Zeke58853349 @JohnMarkSays