It should be obvious but disambiguation by serialization and operationalization applies not just to terms, not just to grammars, but to all grammars of all disciplines. We use competition for consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness to unify the sciences/
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-04 17:24:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1378760403870683137
Missed this: “post-adoption, verbal “axiom” replaces physical geom as arbiter” yes.
Math conflates direction and quantity.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-03 23:16:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1378486575206699017
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1378480617906667522
Aristotle Operational Science (law to testimony to science)
Plato Verbal Philosophy (authoritarian secular theology to idealism to sophistry)
Abrahamimsm (Authoritarian theology to sophistry (fraud) to pseudoscience.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-28 17:20:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1376222767008382976
Reply addressees: @lawrence1978_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1376215875137773574
If you disambiguate and deplatonize the disciplines you end up with logical facility, grammatical facility, and language as the point of the triangle, and the physical (before), behavioral(during), and evolutionary(after) laws as a spectrum across the base.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-28 14:54:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1376185937609261059
Let me help you. The analytic (peirce-frege) vs continental (rousseu-kant) divide, is a Legal and Mathematical method vs an aristotelian (ordinary grammar) and secular-theological method (kantian). I blame the german decline on the french destruction everything german.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-27 14:06:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1375811363780575232
Sophistry question of the day (use of framing to deceive): “Do we know what knowing is?” = Lacking awareness of > awareness of > general or common cases of (grasp) > do we understand system of (apply) > do we exhaustively understand cause, application and limits of (mastery).
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-25 22:15:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1375209786355150856
No as far as I know (a) mathematics is discovered empirically, (b) it’s just another language, within a paradigm, where the dimensions (referents) are constrained to positional (ordinal) names.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-23 23:17:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1374500614265171972
Language, particularly terms that reference combinations of causes, experiences, and consequences, is to thinking as drawing, writing or numbers is to more advanced thinking. You can’t get there from here, so to speak. You need language to talk about ‘thinking’.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-23 22:09:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1374483423029424137
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1374483421708259334
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
There are far too many priests(mullahs, preachers, teachers), philosophers, professors and public intellectuals that seem to think the passion or severity they use in conveyance has any bearing on what they’re saying. there is a class of people who use ‘authority speech’ falsely.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1374483421708259334
I teach disambiguation into first causes, because it’s a continuation of the brain’s process of disambiguation. I teach the disambiguationof language using langauge asa system of measurement, where that system of measurement constitutes the human body and experience.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-23 22:09:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1374483420454166528
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1374483419128721410
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Every example I have found in the sciences says only that we can fool our process of ‘disambiguation’ of a continuos stream of stimuli into ACTIONABLE episodic models of the world. This pseudoscientific woo woo is keeping a generation of 70s ‘academics’ overemployed.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1374483419128721410
Just as humans require reading, writing, mathematics, we require accounting, finance, and economics. And logic, grammar, natural law, testimony, and rhetoric. And at least human scale physics, chemistry, biology and genetics. Reverse the emphasis on Physical vs Natural laws.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-23 15:59:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1374390392464891908