RT @AuronMacintyre: The FBI doesn’t protect you from terrorism because their main goal is to protect our ruling class from opposition
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-02 03:07:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874653681477730601
Theme: Governance
-
I think you must be young and not aware of the shift in strategic understanding
I think you must be young and not aware of the shift in strategic understanding once RU tried to invade;
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-31 23:49:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874241488072364114
Reply addressees: @SpanishBaptist @KeenanPeachy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874173095432589804
-
Unpopular Opinion on the Right: The US/UK strategy was to exhaust RU military, e
Unpopular Opinion on the Right: The US/UK strategy was to exhaust RU military, economy, and political legitimacy and do so by sending arms that were in storage and ready for replacement. I have been saying this since early 2022. And after I had correctly predicted RU would invade UA. As far as I can tell, it will take no more than one more year to achieve this goal, with RU exposing itself as a paper tiger with nukes funded by oil exports. This is what I expect the administration to continue. Since all alternatives result in nothing more than allowing RU to rearm and repeat.
Reply addressees: @KeenanPeachy
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-31 19:12:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874171882368622592
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874162234039165044
-
RT @ScottMGreer: Immigration policy up until 1965 was explicitly defined by ethn
RT @ScottMGreer: Immigration policy up until 1965 was explicitly defined by ethnonationalism. The first naturalization act required one to…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-31 18:14:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874157257338097856
-
Now you’re falling into the naxalt-axalt fallacy. 😉 Left and right are distribu
Now you’re falling into the naxalt-axalt fallacy. 😉
Left and right are distributions, as usual about a third each.
The cause of left and right differences is as I said.
And also, as I said, causality is what it is and variation from causality once known, is and must be an attempt at evasion or deception.
So, with causality in mind, we have an objective means of measuring positions and variations along the distribution of those positions.Reply addressees: @WolfMcNally
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-30 20:21:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873826768186204161
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873823447811489938
-
Give it time. Trump gained the tech sector. He can’t cut them off until the more
Give it time. Trump gained the tech sector. He can’t cut them off until the more serious immigration issues are solved. The right always makes the mistake of trying to solve everything at once instead of incrementally allowing the population to adapt and in doing so lowering…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-30 03:21:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873570036285309395
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873104182183641228
-
LIST OF POSTS ON NATO STRATEGY VS RUSSIA IN UKRAINE Prediction appears to remain
LIST OF POSTS ON NATO STRATEGY VS RUSSIA IN UKRAINE
Prediction appears to remain correct.
(see “Exhaust”)Click here to see the list:
https://x.com/search?q=russia%20OR%20russian%20OR%20RU%2C%20exhaust%20(from%3Acurtdoolittle)&src=typed_query&f=live
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-29 21:15:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873478072168853514
-
Q:–“Do you think Elon should be totally ignored and not rebutted?”– I think ra
Q:–“Do you think Elon should be totally ignored and not rebutted?”–
I think rational debate in matters of public import is always good. I think the problem is due to asymmetric knowledge and incentives. And that we must find a solution despite the resulting variation. The only way to do that is open debate. Thankfully Elon created X so that we can finally have those debates again.
I think we all have a balance scale in our minds.
We each have a collection of weights we put on each side – the case for and against.
Our understanding and our interests determine those weights – and they vary, often quite a bit.
I think elon is correct about the top .01% of scientific and technical talent.
I think my list of recommendations is correct (see below).
I think we should aggressively deport everyone and anyone who won’t ‘buy in’ meaning full integration.
I think some groups cannot fully integrate: islamists, and that said, look at the damage done by the jews.
I am concerned some other groups can but the demographic distribution is a burden not a contribution (race issues).
I am more concerned about white rates of reproduction.
I am most concerned about he decline in average IQ because that determines EVERYTHING.Reposting:
THE ANSWER TO THE H1B DEBATE?
(a) US colleges are selecting against white males.
(b) US colleges are selecting in favor of foreigners b/c $.
(c) The IQ distribution in China means that with a much larger population they will produce as many +130 as the USA and Europe combined.
(d) The IQ distribution in India means that while they produce around the same total +130, they are more likely to pursue USA jobs given the asymmetry of rewards.
(e) Net is that we (the west) do not produce enough +130 to compete in science and tech without SUPPLEMENTING our +130 with theirs.
(f) Policy must be:
– i) to exhaust the US supply before including foreign students in colleges and universities,
– ii) and Visa must be limited to top talent,
– iii) and birthright citizenship and chain migration must be prohibited.As in all things demographics drive everything. That’s my understanding of the data.
Thanks
CDReply addressees: @Anarchrist5 @BuzzPatterson @elonmusk @X
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-29 19:05:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873445351769976832
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873412025503907850
-
There is a vast difference between debate in the pursuit of shared ends, and cri
There is a vast difference between debate in the pursuit of shared ends, and criticism to undermine unshared ends.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-29 17:07:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873415550661243114
Reply addressees: @CloudByter @Anarchrist5 @BuzzPatterson @elonmusk @X
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873412987098484951
-
“Doesn’t Free Speech also come with the responsibility to listen to the criticis
—“Doesn’t Free Speech also come with the responsibility to listen to the criticism?”—
Does it? Listening to criticism? That’s not a property of free speech. That might be a property of utility, or debate or wisdom. But as someone who spends time on social media yourself what percentage of feedback is of any value whatsoever?
In my experience the only value of feedback is the discovery of opportunities to educate. It rarely if ever contributes anything at all to the discourse.
In other words the ancestral european presumption of equality that we inherited from the greeks and the steppe, is a presumption that allows for freedom of speech. But it places no obligation on others to listen. Otherwise Karens would overload the discourse even more than the left uses its gossiping, shaming, rallying, moralizing, psychologizing, and propaganda to overload the discourse.Reply addressees: @CloudByter @Anarchrist5 @BuzzPatterson @elonmusk @X
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-29 17:05:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873415040021487616
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873412987098484951