Theme: Governance

  • It might be necessary. Save the anglosphere. Then the Germanosphere. Then the Eu

    It might be necessary.
    Save the anglosphere.
    Then the Germanosphere.
    Then the Eurosphere.
    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-06 21:00:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876373259299795288

    Reply addressees: @elonmusk

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876174862747930717

  • Q: Curt: –“Are you favorable to repealing the 19th?”– @RichardArion1 Great que

    Q: Curt: –“Are you favorable to repealing the 19th?”– @RichardArion1

    Great question.

    There are my opinions, my insights given the evidence, and the institute position. Those things are not always the same. I have a classical liberal and libertarian optimism of the anglos and founders that the rest of the institute does not share.

    The institute’s position is that we explain the problem of the innate irresponsibility of women for capital and their innate demand for destructive hyperconsumption of it through their irresponsibility. Not that the problem is exclusively female, but that the sexes heavily bias to their natural instincts in the distribution of the voting pool.

    So given those innate differences that are inviolable, we provide a spectrum of solutions from revocation, to heavy investment in education and training, to adding requirements, to adding separate house for women, and we leave the solution up to the population.

    The simple version is revocation.

    The hard version is a combination of heavy investment, adding requirements for demonstrated responsibility for the commons, and separate houses.

    So, If you ask my opinion, I’m simply not sure, and I’m not sure because I am part of the Jones Generation between the boomers and gen x, and I am not certain I can separate my intuitions, lived experience, and understanding from influencing my choice.

    So if I must answer, my personal opinion is that we would all be better off if we let women be women instead of trying to make them men. And we take a more aggressive role in constitutionally addressing the sex differences in responsibilities and inalienations to codify our observations and expectations.

    Women are no demonstrably happier than in the past – much less so – and the polity is more fragile because of them. They are just very easy to sedate and influence with increases in consumption and attention and escape from responsibility for defense of the capital of the commons upon which their luxury of hyperconsumption depends.

    That’s what the science says. So that’s where I stand and the institute stands.

    Cheers

    CD

    Reply addressees: @RichardArion1


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-06 20:25:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876364369212387329

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876360867497034200

  • YOU CAN’T HELP THE LOST RIGHT DIRECTLY Two nitwits on the right that did the mos

    YOU CAN’T HELP THE LOST RIGHT DIRECTLY
    Two nitwits on the right that did the most harm to our original movement were Keith Woods and Nick Fuentes. We were undermined by the right. The left didn’t even give us negative press.

    Now we can take some of the blame, because John felt we could ‘organize a disorganized political wing’ by reorienting the ‘lost boys’ away from violence and into protesting and demonstrating for objectives, rather than just tilting at windmills and falling for the left’s baiting-into-hazard *every single time*.

    But the truth is that despite gaining two million followers, the quality of men in that distribution was … terrible. We estimate on the order of one in a thousand.

    So tactically moving from addressing the intellectual frame of the classical liberal, the libertarian, to the reactionary, and in our case, revolutionary’ and instead to the populist, young, undereducated, underemployed, (undersexed), had gained us a large number of eyeballs, spread our message, created competition for their attention, but was dependent upon John (not me or Brandon).

    And so (as intellectuals, not populists) we were unprepared or the backlash against us, and in particular the ‘punching right’ by the acolytes of the broken outcast dysfunctional majority. John gave up. It was in fact his movement. He was the leadership of our populism. I am not and never was capable of such a thing.

    We learned that you cannot put those people to good purpose, you can only agitate them. And in that sense, even if agitation and agitprop is all they can manage, they at least give voice and vent to their frustrations.

    And that is good enough.

    As I say often, My primary failing in life is overestimating the common folk. And I don’t seem to be able to over come it.

    Why?

    I was raised with Noblesse Oblige. Those who need rescuing are not wrong in their complaints. They are anti-intellectual, emotional, and unable to act intelligently as groups. But that does not obviate the responsibility of those of us born with more gifts to seek betterment of their condition. They are our people after all. And unlike the left, their search is at least moral even if they cannot suppress their emotion and rage long enough to act in their interests or follow those who would solve their problems instead of merely providing emotional therapy.

    There is so little of our aristocracy remaining we may have to work hard for decades to recreate it.

    And given my health and age it will take your generations to do that. I can, we can, only create the conceptual and legal foundations for you to restore our civilization.

    Love you all.
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-06 19:00:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876343162291331072

  • He’s not a politician. He’s a citizen. Should we stop all the leftists around th

    He’s not a politician. He’s a citizen. Should we stop all the leftists around the world who have vast politicals upport that interfere in american government?


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-06 18:30:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876335440141402131

    Reply addressees: @eyeslasho

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876294697859334513

  • Clarifying the findings of previous historians: The West solved the problem of p

    Clarifying the findings of previous historians:
    The West solved the problem of politics. The Chinese only the state. The Hindus only the class. The Middle East failed altogether, and Africa never tried.)


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-06 18:24:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876333945316647066

  • Clarifying the findings of previous historians: The West solved the problem of p

    Clarifying the findings of previous historians:
    The West solved the problem of politics. The Chinese only the state. The Hindus only the class. The Middle East failed altogether, and Africa never tried.)


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-06 18:24:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876333945257852929

  • MIDDLE EASTERN INBREEDING RESULTINGIN NEGATIVE TRUST, ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL FAI

    MIDDLE EASTERN INBREEDING RESULTINGIN NEGATIVE TRUST, ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL FAILURE

    “In 1931, King Feisal of Iraq described his subjects as “devoid of any patriotic idea, … connected by no common tie, giving ear to evil; prone to anarchy, and perpetually ready to rise against… https://twitter.com/hbdchick/status/1874932947008258499


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-06 18:23:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876333801330311224

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: Homogeneous political organization has been so extraordinaril

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: Homogeneous political organization has been so extraordinarily successful it can support significant exceptions.

    Except…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-05 21:14:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1876014425116979238

  • Elon is NOT A CONSERVATIVE he is a centrist

    Elon is NOT A CONSERVATIVE he is a centrist.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-05 18:48:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1875977677972361676

    Reply addressees: @mehdirhasan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1875911390550282721

  • Let me translate: Elon is saying that Reform needs someone that can make use of

    Let me translate: Elon is saying that Reform needs someone that can make use of social media to bypass the mainstream (dying) media. I don’t see this as replacing Nigel. I see this as we need more voices acting on behalf of reform so that we reach new media as well as old.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-05 18:47:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1875977558510145988

    Reply addressees: @JuliaHB1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1875914587859812429