Theme: Governance

–“Q: Curt: Can you summarize your views on this in a short essay? No more than 1000 words?”– Faraj Al Rashidi

Yes. Or at least we can try in 1200 words. 😉

Though, I summarize it here daily in shorter form,. But the ‘proof’ requires far more explanation, and an increasingly broad hierarchy of contexts, and that proof is what causes people to understand why our behavior is what it is, and why there is no alternative to our behavior other than increasing conformity to the laws of nature by taking responsibility for ourselves

How? “By The pursuit of self-determination by self-determined means, by mutual demand for responsibility, the resulting mutual insurance of sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, truth, excellence, and beauty, and the resulting markets association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war, limiting us to truthful debate, disassociation, and courts for the resolution of disputes.”

Nature is not the kind god we were promised by submission to our priests and philosophers. Instead, the universe is a vast, hostile, irradiated wasteland, and this solar system, this planet, its geology, its climates, and completing life forms from bacteria and viruses to our near-peer super predators have nearly exterminated us over and over again in just our short history, beginning with homo erectus. Nature, nature’s laws, and God if there is one have no mercy: evolve or die.

So, the fundamental problem we face, is that the more people we attempt to integrate into this responsibility for insurance (citizenship, the polity, the civilization), the less able and less willing and the more discipline and training that it takes for the (costly) inclusion (integration, indoctrination) into that responsibility. And while it was somewhat difficult to integrate the Europeans, it has been difficult to integrate the working classes, extremely difficult to integrate, and it has been almost impossible to integrate women who are in every fiber of their beings, hostile to it.

Why? The fundamental instincts of men and women are opposites: males to obtain status for cooperation and mating opportunity by demonstration of excellence and accumulation of responsibility for capital, females obtain status by gaining access to male responsibility and capital without producing that capital and responsibility themselves. In other words, women seek irresponsibility and unaccountability at all times. And worse, they are by and large excellent at selection (shopping) and consumption and signaling, but they are terrible to incompetent at innovation, production, capitalization and demand for responsibility from themselves or others.

So, in summary, we are ‘evolving’ Western civilization and dragging others behind us, at great resistance, out of peasant agrarian irresponsibility that allows the expansion of the underclasses into aristocratic responsibility. And in the West we have gradually introduced classes and paid the price of their responsibilities by forcing them by institutions, both formal and informal, into responsibility. And women are the lowest level of tolerance for responsibility for the polity in any demographic distribution. And as such, we are paying the cost of integration of women into the polity and have not yet outlawed female irresponsible antisocial-antipolitical seditious and treasonous behavior.

Worse, the only other group capable of intellectual innovation in the world is the Ashkenazim (female European male semitic Jews). But the Ashkenazim like the Jews and truthfully like all of the Semites, practice the low trust seditious means of warfare by undermining. And these Ashkenazim have invented the marxist sequence of pseudoscientific cults, to replace their invention of the Abrahamic sequence of cults (maternal priesthood), the purpose of both is to prevent indo-europeans (paternal aristocracy) from demanding responsibility, and with that responsibility demanding truth, reciprocity, and trust, that low trust tribal societies and frankly the lower classes and women are incapable of.

So we should have expected this ‘anglo enlightenment project’ of creating an ‘aristocracy of responsibility of everyone’ to be offset by the Jewish ‘priesthood of the irresponsibility of everyone’, where the aristocracy uses the state law and economy to produce a natural aristocracy: hierarchy that is capable of success at producing a high velocity of evolutionary competition, by adaptation that brings us into correspondence with the laws of nature, versus the Jewish and female priesthood of irresponsibility that as we have seen with the Abrahamic, religions relies not on correspondence with nature but the illusion of social construction of falsehoods that deny the laws of nature, but prevent the need for responsibility to adapt to those laws, thus creating semitic dark ages, and explaining why there are no female-dominant civilizations.

So we choose between the female method of depriving others of responsibility, by manipulation, seduction, and social construction of falsehoods that she uses to mollify the neurology of her children as well as other women who are likewise in need of mollification, and thereby creating and empowering a political priesthood using the same feminine techniques of manipulation, seduction, fraud, and social construction to maintain power over these feminine and the feminine minded at the cost of infantilization and devolution (which we are seeing). Or we choose the masculine aristocratic method of demanding responsibility by insurance of self-determination by self-determined means by truth, duty, reciprocity, excellence and beauty. In other words, left to their own devices the infantile classes are simply criminals and should never have access to political influence.

Solving this problem is a matter of encoding into law the prohibition on female, semitic, jewish, Abrahamic, Islamic, marxist lies and false promises that, like all religions, seduce our ‘weak’ into social construction of some salvation from adaptation to the laws of nature, by evasion of responsibility for personal and private adaptation to the laws of nature and nature’s god.

My work, our organization’s work, consists of preventing more dark ages, preventing more devolution, dysgenia, decline, and collapse, by preventing both the female antisocial behavior and the promotion of theology, philosophy, ideology, and institutionalization of any of them, so that we are as capable of ending fraud, sedition, treason, cultural, and political warfare in politics, as we are in the commercial sector, and as a consequence improving our ability at both public and private sector fraud.

That’s the summary.
But that’s just the explanation.

Our work on The Method, The Science, The Logic, and the Grammars, contains all the complexity necessary to produce unambiguous law to do so.

And the Constitution contains the amendments that produce the institutional outcomes by law. This produces a market for suppressing feminine-semitic-abrahamic-marxist fraud that will, within a decade, cleanse our civilization of harm.

This will not only prevent a civil war, but will prevent the dark age that was launched by Marx in 1850, was brought to the US as race and cultural Marxism in the 1950s, matured with the capture of the academy in the 1970s, and has culminated in the destruction of our institutions of the cultural production of responsibility (aristocracy) in their ‘last step’ we call Woke today.

As such my objective (though not all of the Fellows as the institute agree), is to assist those of feminine cognition to mature into mindfulness and responsibility so that we may preserve our inheritance: The uniqueness of Western Civilization as the only civilization that DIDN’T FAIL nature’s law of evolutionary adaptation despite the high emotional and psychological costs of responsibility for self-determination, sovereignty reciprocity truth duty excellence and beauty.

Every other civilization failed by 800ad. That means between the bronze age collapse in 1200bc and the recovery in 800bc, every civilization failed within one thousand years, by exhausting the opportunity provided by agrarian production: creating authoritarian polities with a small extractive ruling clan, and a vast horde of peasants who remained irresponsible.

Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
“The Law of Man, Nature, and Nature’s God”