Theme: Governance

RE: JEWS (MULSIMS TOO): OVERCOMING RAGE AND PRODUCING REFORMS THAT FOREVER FIX THE PROBLEM.
Well you know, you can remain angry and want to punish these people, or you can simply seek to solve the problem that like most problems caused us conflict over the milennia.

Like most people I was angry at first. Despite the efforts, the harm the christians, and the jews, and now the muslims have done to the west is far far worse and more seditous than we’d imagined – even among those of us who understood the christian destruction of the ancient world, and worse, the islamic destruction of the seven great civilizations of the ancient world, leaving only China and the subsaharan untouched by the abrahamic cognitive disease.

But, once I realized we’re all bots, then I understood it’s the responsibility of those of us who grasp these things enact laws and policies and institutions to bring about the rules and incdentives that prohibit bad behavior. We focus (rightly) on the jews precisely because we are particularly and uniquely vulnerable to the feminine method of undermining and warfare, and even more so the weaponization of finance and debt, because we prohibit ourselves those forms of coercion and deception and baiting into hazard becuase they violate our first principles of sovereignty, freedom of choice, duty to the commons, truth, and reciprocity.

It’s a fixable problem and we have or at least I have done the work to prohibit the behavior forever, and oncde I understood the problem I understood also it was a relatively easy fix. The hard part was the testable criteria for truth and reciprocity in court that would make it impossible to circumvent again in the future by anyother means.

Do we blame women for their immorality? It’s hard to think of women as more immoral than men, because we had done so well at limiting their immorality worldwide. But while men are bad, women are evil. While men are criminal women are treasonous. It’s in their selfish nature. Similarly, do we blame the jews and the muslims for their immorality? The jews in particular since their strategy is entirely to replicate the female? The muslims becasue of their absurd devotion to what has been a failed strategy since the end of the islamic expansion – reducing their people to ignorance superstition and worst of all, dysgenia in a spectrum of gene pools already limited to a full standard deviation or more below the european, and demographic distribution that all but ensures they will forever be backward, unproductive, and poor in a world no longer purely of agrarian peasants?

I prefer to fix the problem so we don’t have a 110th time so to speak. And fixing that problem first by law, second by explanation and education, will have to work it’s way into jewish and muslim culture for a few generations. And it will ‘hurt’ them a greate deal in their cultural memory, self image and self worth to understand that they are organized crime organizations on one end, and disorganized raiders, hiding under pretense of religion and culture, becuse they cannot form loyalty, responsibilty, or states necessary to do otherwise but parasitically depend upon the institutions produced by others.

But we have learned and adapted ourelves after learning that our direct colonial efforts failed. And that in the postwar period our indirect attempts to domesticate and modernize less developed civilizations has faiked – most importantly russian, chinese, arab, and maybe now african (I hold out hope for subsaharan africa if it remains evangelical christian). And we are just now learning that our hope of equality of ability and reason among sexes, classe, cultures and races is also a failed project.

So we must like the chinese in their prevoius iterations, learn that the best we can do is wall ourselves off, focus on ourselves, and trade and cooperate with those who wish to do the same. And restore the world to historical trend as a conflict of civilizations where each civilization is the group evolutionary strategy of the racde it formed in, and each race in its geography, genetics, distribution, culture, and history, must evolve on its own terms, while not imposing costs on others to compensate for their own failures.

It’s not so much about forgivness. I don’t think in those terms. It’s merely solving theproblem so it no longer exists, and continuing to drage mprimitive mankind out of ignorance, superstition, parasitism, predation, criminality, iresponsibilty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffereing, child mortality, early death, despotic government, and the vicisitudes of a nature all but constantly trying to exterminate us. And an uncaring god, gods, or universe, that permits it all to happen. So that by the crucible of hardship we evolved into the gods we imagine and correct those gods we presumed – but did not exist.

Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
😉

Reply addressees: @BasedLawyer