Theme: Governance

  • No. The terms “republic” and “democracy” are often used interchangeably, but the

    No.

    The terms “republic” and “democracy” are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct historical and theoretical meanings. Both are forms of government where the power resides in the people, but they differ in how that power is exercised and organized. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

    Republic
    1. Representative Governance: In a republic, citizens elect representatives who make decisions on their behalf. The elected officials are accountable to the people and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government’s power over citizens.

    2. Constitutional Framework: Republics often have a constitution that outlines the powers and limitations of the government, providing a stable legal framework.

    3. Rule of Law: A republic places a strong emphasis on the rule of law and often includes a judicial system that is empowered to interpret the law.

    4. Checks and Balances: Republics usually have multiple branches of government (e.g., executive, legislative, judicial) with distinct powers and responsibilities, designed to prevent any single entity from gaining too much power.

    5. Indirect Democracy: While a republic is democratic in nature, it is an indirect form of democracy. Citizens have the power to elect their representatives, but they do not govern directly.

    6. Protection of Minority Rights: Republics often have mechanisms to protect the rights of minorities against the tyranny of the majority.

    Democracy
    1. Popular Rule: In a democracy, the power to make decisions lies directly with the people rather than being mediated through elected representatives.

    2. Direct Participation: In its purest form, known as direct democracy, all citizens participate in decision-making directly rather than through elected representatives.

    3. Majority Rule: Decisions in a democracy are generally made by majority vote, either directly or through elected representatives.

    4. Flexibility: Democracies can be more flexible than republics because they don’t necessarily have a formal constitution that limits the powers of the government.

    5. Simpler Structure: Democracies often have fewer governing bodies or branches, making the system less complex but potentially more susceptible to the tyranny of the majority.

    Key Difference
    Majority vs. Minority Rights: Democracies often operate on majority rule, while republics have mechanisms to protect minority rights.

    See?
    Why is it that I should have to explain these subjects to an ignorant and ideological population day after day? Because you are easily manipulated – because only about ten percent of the population can or does think. And of them the majority are male. And they usually do not include men that I am forced to educate in self defense against their ignorance.

    Reply addressees: @9898guitar @RadioTodd13


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 18:45:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706741724146515968

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706739496333853181

  • THE NECESSITY AND PERPETUITY OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND WHY IT CANNOT AND WILL

    THE NECESSITY AND PERPETUITY OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND WHY IT CANNOT AND WILL NEVER CHANGE
    Just to educate you out of your ignorance. By design and for the good of all we live in a concurrent majority constitution and government, not majority constitution and government. We do not live in a democracy but a republic under concurrency and commonality. And the reason you don’t know this is that you were intentionally indoctrinated so that in your ignorance you would assist in undermining it.

    The Science of The American Constitution:

    1. NATURAL LAW: (sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, tort)
    The Institution of the Natural Law
    1. The constitution, bill of rights, declaration, federalist papers, Blackstone’s commentaries, and history of the common law, the common germanic law, and the ancestral european law (west indo european)

    2. COMMONALITY: Across classes and regions in what not to do. Empiricism in discovery of prohibitions.
    The institutions of commonality:
    2. The hierarchy of courts

    3. CONCURRENCY: ACROSS CLASSES AND REGIONS in what we should do, and not a majority independent of classes and regions (tyranny of the majority). Empiricism in the discovery of agreements on the production of commons.
    The Institutions of Concurrency
    3.1. The House(proxy for the people) for concurrency in the population
    3.2. The Senate(proxy for governor) for concurrency in the states.
    3.3. The Electoral College for Concurrency of the states in the selection of the president (proxy for nobility)

    This system was designed to give the people as whole and the governors individually on behalf of the states, and the jury of the electoral college on behalf of that governor and that state, to ensure that there was the maximum competition and maxium commonality across every faction in order to continue the common law tradition that we may impose nothing that is not decided first by commonality or concurrency. In other words, the people, in regions and classes must agree.

    This entire system was designed specifically to PREVENT the horrors you seek to spread in your ignorance and arrogance.

    Sincerely

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @9898guitar @RadioTodd13


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 17:38:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706725028299984896

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706678898073939991

  • BIG DYSFUNCTIONAL STATES: PROHIBITING THE COASTAL DISEASE FROM SPREADING Nitwit:

    BIG DYSFUNCTIONAL STATES: PROHIBITING THE COASTAL DISEASE FROM SPREADING
    Nitwit: “Why should North Dakota and Wyoming have more electoral power than California and New York?”

    CurtD: “To prevent the spread of horrific ideas, policy, and yes, people, from those states to others through the [ use of the ] federal government.”

    Nitwit: “What a weird way to spell “to disenfranchise as many voters as possible”

    RESPONSE
    Big Dysfunctional states are not disenfranchised. They are prohibited from disenfranchising others. Both NY and CA as well as Chicago and others, have, by violating the constitution and the law, effectively but not yet punatively seceded from the union. And the federal government is now torn by the conflict of regions as europe is torn by the conflict of latin, germanic, balto-slavic, baltic, and russian, and as the entire world by the conflict of civilizations.

    While the USA is a country (contiguous territory) it remains a federation of independent states, on the model of britain and the holy roman empire of the germanic peoples, and broader christiandom – and the federal government, meaning the concurrency of the judgment of all the other states, ensures a republican government and a minimum number of fundamental rights to members of each state.

    But within each State we are free to choose within those constraints as we may – despite what the sh—hole states of California and NY, and the other states with sh–hole cities, wish to impose upon others.

    The only ‘oddity’ so far is that we should probably require permission of a state for entry and political participation that we do for the federation itself – restoring passports for each state, and preventing the spread of contagion of irresponsibility from the sh—hole cities and states.

    And the future will include this restoration of state sovereignty and devolution of the federal government back to the states, reversing the centralization of the Civil War and world war eras.

    Thus returning the USA to its heritage, as an innovation of the Germanic civilization and the market for polities producing the competition between states, constrained by the natural common concurrent law of nature, and then constrained by the court of the church, and in the present and future constrained by the secular court of the law.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Dave_Oswald_CEO @Abusoru @RadioTodd13 @9898guitar


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 17:24:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706721353900941312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706709481344598091

  • To prevent the spread of horrific ideas, policy,and yes, people, from those stat

    To prevent the spread of horrific ideas, policy,and yes, people, from those states to others through the federal government.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 16:18:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706704898597724211

    Reply addressees: @Abusoru @RadioTodd13 @9898guitar

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706682294407245983

  • Well, that would require you think, speak, and act as responsible adults – in ma

    Well, that would require you think, speak, and act as responsible adults – in matters of the commons. And the accumulating evidence is that you’re incapable of it, because you cannot separate your reason from instinct.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 00:36:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706467830726537551

    Reply addressees: @milfm4gnet @schizarella

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706466707274096645

  • I’m about three or four degrees of relations out, where I used to be two or thre

    I’m about three or four degrees of relations out, where I used to be two or three. But as I understand it, the cadre around him is building a portfolio of people that can achieve in this administration what he couldn’t in the last.

    I wish I could be press secretary because that…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 23:31:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706451342762328388

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706443288218063144

  • Good. Then lets follow my advice and sever all strategic economic and technologi

    Good. Then lets follow my advice and sever all strategic economic and technological ties. Redirect our efforts to move chinese industry to you, and continue to target south america. We can repatriate your people so that you can use them yourselves, and leave you to your own devices. You have the population. You have a window of opportunity in geostrategy. And while you are bordered by hostiles and strategically weak, given your peninsular location and the sea, there is no reason you cannot rise on your own – except your long tradition of not doing so.

    Reply addressees: @Memele1718212 @empireenjoyer10 @2020Blackstone


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 22:59:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706443361656176640

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706441253074903192

  • RT @ScottAdamsSays: Well, it’s time to call it. Free speech is no longer a featu

    RT @ScottAdamsSays: Well, it’s time to call it.

    Free speech is no longer a feature of America.

    I can’t keep pretending. It feels absurd.…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 22:47:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706440270647013838

  • RT @elonmusk: Like Gulliver, tied down by thousands of of little strings, we los

    RT @elonmusk: Like Gulliver, tied down by thousands of of little strings, we lose our freedom one regulation at a time


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 22:46:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706440180486279400

  • Alliances are not all or nothing questions, but like markets consist of a portfo

    Alliances are not all or nothing questions, but like markets consist of a portfolio of trades. I understand the vileness of this individual. But ‘direct action’ inside another country, is something we have worked to prohibit for centuries.

    Otherwise assasination and the resulting chaos are as bad or worse than war.

    There is a reason we don’t assasinate Putin or Xi. And only depose terrorists like Ghadaffi and Hussein.

    Reply addressees: @Memele1718212 @empireenjoyer10 @2020Blackstone


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 22:44:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706439561998409728

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706438759187902464