Law is prohibitionary and must target the individual. Policy is hypothetical and must target the family. Individual law. Family policy.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 19:37:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665252190647398401
Law is prohibitionary and must target the individual. Policy is hypothetical and must target the family. Individual law. Family policy.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 19:37:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665252190647398401
We created a great number lies in granting women political enfranchisement. They used it to destroy the west. Policy=Family. Law=Individual.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 19:20:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665247904878206978
NEW MOVEMENT: “SPRING CLEANING”
Starting this spring, 2016, we declare Islamism a political movement masquerading as a religion, with an immoral incompatible competing law, and clean the west of islamism, just as we cleaned Spain of Islam and cleaned the west of Communism. Truthful Speech replaces Free Speech. Religious freedom is limited to that which is entirely compatible with western natural law. And all monuments other than christian must be torn down and removed. We either reform the church or take its property and possessions to the last stone and blade of grass. And we convert each into a credit union with zero taxation on interest and earnings on that which is under its control. We hang, guillotine, impale, or burn anyone who even raises a weak objection. And we end this century of lying propaganda postmodernism marxism and destruction. The cost? Young and old will go to work in those minor jobs rather than sit at home and stare at the idiot box.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 17:39:00 UTC
Had we given women legal equality, but their own separate house of commons, we would not have had the collapse of western civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 17:37:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665222002945466368
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665219842367209473
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The first question of ethics is why don’t I kill you and take your land, women, and things – not assuming cooperation as the starting point.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/665219842367209473
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
The first question of ethics is why don’t I kill you and take your land, women, and things – not assuming cooperation as the starting point.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/665219842367209473
Law is prohibitionary and must target the individual. Policy is hypothetical and must target the family. Individual law. Family policy.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 14:37:00 UTC
We created a great number lies in granting women political enfranchisement. They used it to destroy the west. Policy=Family. Law=Individual.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 14:20:00 UTC
THE JUDICIOUS USE OF FEAR AND VIOLENCE
How do we prevent the rise of the corporate state over the interest of kin, tribe and nation? Fear. The purpose of kings is to deny people an alternative. It is not that kings are good. It is that no government is good. The only goods are the market for goods and services in which competition provides incentives to produce and consume; the market for commons in which prevention of privatization provides incentives to invest in long term returns; and the ostracization from both markets if one fails to consume, product and invest. The most moral use of violence is in the prevention of parasitism leaving man only productivity as a means of survival. An armed militia provides power-seekers fear. The sheriff and judiciary provide abusers with fear. The king is merely evidence that the militia, sheriff, and judiciary succeed in the use of fear. For it is the judicious use of fear that eliminates the need for judicious use of violence.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 13:30:00 UTC
Had we given women legal equality, but their own separate house of commons, we would not have had the collapse of western civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 12:37:00 UTC
—-“A bureaucracy ultimately always ends up costing the people more than an upper class.”—-
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-12 21:53:00 UTC
CAPITALISM IS WON, NOW ITS A BATTLE FOR RULE OF LAW, STRICT CONSTRUCTION, AND MARKET GOVERNMENT.
Capitalism is the voluntary organization of production distribution and trade made possible by the preservation of property allocation to individuals, the universal requirement of voluntary exchange, insured by common law, the evolution of contract, money, prices, and interest – which provide information and incentives to each individual necessary for choosing between available actions. Consumer capitalism has won. We’ve spent over a century conquering the pseudoscience of marxism and socialism. But despite kicking and screaming, we’ve dragged humanity out of ignorance and poverty with capitalism.
Now the battle has changed. The problem is not property rights, or capitalism, but rule of law and corruption.
We must incrementally suppress discretionary legislation, corruption, and lying, framing and propaganda from the world, starting first, here at home.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-12 16:26:00 UTC