I think the next fifteen to twenty years will experience greater change than the last seventy.
End of Pax Americana-Britannia.
Pandora.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-26 11:56:00 UTC
I think the next fifteen to twenty years will experience greater change than the last seventy.
End of Pax Americana-Britannia.
Pandora.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-26 11:56:00 UTC
every substantive model that I have seen shows him taking 55% of the vote or more with virtual certainty.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-25 18:00:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/702916073247645696
Reply addressees: @mattyglesias
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/702881228324794370
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/702881228324794370
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/02/linh-dinh/broken-ukraine/Typical Mises Institute ideological nonsense blaming Ukraine’s condition on the USA, instead of Ukraine’s poverty on Russian influence and corruption, and the Russian money used to bribe politicians and bureaucrats to keep Ukrainians in poverty and under Russian dependency. Or the fact that the USA disarmed Ukraine, which had the world’s largest stockpile of nuclear weapons. Or the intentional arrangement between Russia and the ousted president to destroy the Ukrainian military so that Russia could take over the country. Or the fact THAT UKRAINE REPRESENTS EXACTLY THE SOCIETY THE MISES INSTITUTE SEEKS TO RECONSTRUCT.
Which shouldn’t be a surprise us because Mises was from Ukraine, not Austria, and Rothbard’s ancestors were from Russia and occupied Poland. Meaning that they were part of the Russian Empire.
We all assume that when the boys come back we’ll have another Maidan Revolution and this time it will be good and bloody.
We can only hope.
We can also hope that all pretense that Rotbhardian and Misesian anarchism is anything but an attempt to reconstruct the gangster despotism of Ukraine and Russia where both of them – and their ideologies – came from.
I live in Rothbardian society. There is no government here. Just oligarchs using the state apparatus to extract money from people imprisoned in a society under siege.
Which is exactly what Rothbardianism would produce.
These men were not heroes. Rothbard was no different from karl marx or leo strauss: conducting a war on aristocratic liberty in pursuit of libertine low trust poverty.
END THE LIES. FIND MISES INSTITUTE DONORS AND PUBLICLY SHAME THEM FOR UNDERMINING LIBERTY
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-24 06:55:00 UTC
Women obtained the vote and within a generation undid 10k years of civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-24 06:10:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/702375074549080064
Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke @MartianHoplite @voxday @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/700082425616056320
IN REPLY TO:
@PoseidonAwoke
Hey @curtdoolittle , @MartianHoplite, @voxday, @StefanMolyneux
Brilliant analysis: Why women destroy civilization:
https://t.co/S6abiYbMeF
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/700082425616056320
If we take out America then it is possible. But we must remove her from the world stage. This is possible by a number of methods. The indirect being the best. Through insurrection and secession. Or through insurrection and reconstitution the empire can fall. With it Anglo universalism falls.
If we clear the west in this generation then we can save her.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-23 12:57:00 UTC
ALL THERE IS TO SAY OF LIBERTY. THERE IS NOTHING MORE.
(from elsewhere)
I think that public intellectuals should engage in criticism and advocacy, and where possible explanation. But reason and rationalism are two different standards. And that any statements of proof (strict construction) whether for justificationary or critical purposes, should be left to professionals in that discipline.
More than anything, in hindsight, the libertarian movement is, perhaps as much or moreso than marxism, little more than a history of amateurish, badly made philosophy, attempting to justify a minority disposition as a possible majority preference, in the hope of applying christian moral rhetoric, to obtain the sovereignty of the martial aristocracy
The philosophy of liberty consists in sovereignty and property, the common law, universal standing, and universal application (rule of law), held before a jury of one’s peers. Nomocracy – the law – is the only source of liberty. And the universal militia the only possible source of nomocracy. Even Hayek, slow as he was, finally understood. (Spoken as a slow worker myself.)
We still carry our desire to hear great tales around the campfire before sleep – to carry through our dreams means of integrating our day’s experiences. We still carry the desire to speak in great tales and inspirational language.
But liberty is valuable in that we obtain the maximum ability to pursue our ends as long as we provide no disincentive for others to permit us to do so. And through this liberty we produce trial and error in greater volume than the alternatives. We calculate our evolution at a greater pace than any alternative.
And because we calculate faster, with more of us, we compete against other groups who are less able, more successfully.
We construct liberty not by advocacy, but like the law, by preventing all other alternatives by the aggressive use of organized violence.
That is all there is to say. That is all there is to liberty. Nothing more. The rest is gilding for the weak, timid, the cowardly, and the ignorant.
Rule or be ruled.
That is all there is to say on the topic of liberty.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-23 02:31:00 UTC
https://lionoftheblogosphere.wordpress.com/2016/02/19/censorship-works/Censorship Works. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-20 07:39:00 UTC
Truth: The only reason must choose between all-consuming, and all-saving, is a monopoly government. Two nations can pursue two strategies.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-17 17:03:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/700002518181552129
TRUTH: They want to export risk upon us to obtain consumption. We want to export constraint on consumption upon them to obtain safety.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-17 17:01:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/700002149149904896
How do we know that the left wants to farm us, but we not want to farm the left? Because we tolerate secession. They don’t.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-17 13:43:00 UTC