Sep 06, 2016 8:43am One theorizes and profits from theorizing out of self-defense. One organizes and profits from organizing out of self defense. One designs and calculates and profits from designing and calculating out of self-defense. One manages and profits from managing out of self-defense. One labors and profits from labor out of self-defense. We progress by our defense against the dark forces of nature, time, ignorance, and man’s design for predictability, stagnation, and parasitism by women and predation by men. We must rule. We must rule for defense alone. But by our rule we transcend man. By the rule of all others, man rarely transcends at all, and others seek to destroy us.
Theme: Governance
-
I Know My Job: To Create A Plan And Make Room For Alexanders
Sep 06, 2016 11:43am ( I am not Alexander. I am only Aristotle. I understand my role. To create the strategy and let loose the moral license which can be used by the generals, captains, sergeants, and soldiers to change the world to that which they desire. But we have given license to the bourgeoisie in the anglo enlightenment, and the peasantry in the Jewish enlightenment, and we must succeed where the German’s failed in returning license to the aristocracy. Warriors need a strategy because violence is an instrument of change, but not an instrument of administration and preservation. My job is to give permission to the martial class to restore aristocracy for the necessity of our people, the leadership of our civilization, and the transcendence of man. ) ( Josh Jeppson )
-
I Know My Job: To Create A Plan And Make Room For Alexanders
Sep 06, 2016 11:43am ( I am not Alexander. I am only Aristotle. I understand my role. To create the strategy and let loose the moral license which can be used by the generals, captains, sergeants, and soldiers to change the world to that which they desire. But we have given license to the bourgeoisie in the anglo enlightenment, and the peasantry in the Jewish enlightenment, and we must succeed where the German’s failed in returning license to the aristocracy. Warriors need a strategy because violence is an instrument of change, but not an instrument of administration and preservation. My job is to give permission to the martial class to restore aristocracy for the necessity of our people, the leadership of our civilization, and the transcendence of man. ) ( Josh Jeppson )
-
Every Tribe Can Transcend Under Aristocracy
( reminder. I don’t do racism. I do truth and activism. What are you gonna do? I don’t care what others do that defeats you. What are you going to do so that you aren’t defeated? )
-
Every Tribe Can Transcend Under Aristocracy
( reminder. I don’t do racism. I do truth and activism. What are you gonna do? I don’t care what others do that defeats you. What are you going to do so that you aren’t defeated? )
-
How Is Propertarianism Not Another Fantasy?
—“So Curt. How is this not a new Rothbardian ideal fantasy? Ie which government specifically are we speaking of taking over, and when we do, how many people do we stack like cordwood for jaywalking?”— Jonathan Page I can’t respond to all of that in a single comment.But I’ll jump ahead and take a guess your underlying question. First, natural law prohibits parasitism. Contract law allows for the construction of commons. (that’s what a contract does). The difference between public and private contract law, is that you can prohibit people from consumption and competition, whereas in the market we hope to create consumption and competition. So we can create commons (like the commons of property rights) that create a good (property rights) by prohibiting consumption of that which one has not obtained through homesteading. transformation, or exchange. We can create parks by allowing passage but not use.(etc). We can create all sorts of commons that one cannot socialize losses against, or privatize. As long as they are not parasitic. So this prohibits rents but allows investments, including informational rents and investments. 1) Why not a fantasy? It can be implemented in law – easily I might add, as a set of amendments to the constitution. 2) Which government? Contractualism.: Rule of natural, common, strictly constructed, judge-discovered law. intergenerational monarchy as veto(judge) of last resort. Market government by voluntary exchange and legal dissent. Market economy by voluntary exchange and legal dissent. Market for reproduction (family) by voluntary exchange and legal dissent. Market for Polities – Rights of association and disassociation. ( Or, as we say ‘markets in everything.) 3) Jaywalking Well, you know, it turns out that zero tolerance (broken window policing) by individuals and sheriffs is the optimum method of producing prosperity. And we have a lot fewer big ‘bads’ when we eliminate the small bads.
-
How Is Propertarianism Not Another Fantasy?
—“So Curt. How is this not a new Rothbardian ideal fantasy? Ie which government specifically are we speaking of taking over, and when we do, how many people do we stack like cordwood for jaywalking?”— Jonathan Page I can’t respond to all of that in a single comment.But I’ll jump ahead and take a guess your underlying question. First, natural law prohibits parasitism. Contract law allows for the construction of commons. (that’s what a contract does). The difference between public and private contract law, is that you can prohibit people from consumption and competition, whereas in the market we hope to create consumption and competition. So we can create commons (like the commons of property rights) that create a good (property rights) by prohibiting consumption of that which one has not obtained through homesteading. transformation, or exchange. We can create parks by allowing passage but not use.(etc). We can create all sorts of commons that one cannot socialize losses against, or privatize. As long as they are not parasitic. So this prohibits rents but allows investments, including informational rents and investments. 1) Why not a fantasy? It can be implemented in law – easily I might add, as a set of amendments to the constitution. 2) Which government? Contractualism.: Rule of natural, common, strictly constructed, judge-discovered law. intergenerational monarchy as veto(judge) of last resort. Market government by voluntary exchange and legal dissent. Market economy by voluntary exchange and legal dissent. Market for reproduction (family) by voluntary exchange and legal dissent. Market for Polities – Rights of association and disassociation. ( Or, as we say ‘markets in everything.) 3) Jaywalking Well, you know, it turns out that zero tolerance (broken window policing) by individuals and sheriffs is the optimum method of producing prosperity. And we have a lot fewer big ‘bads’ when we eliminate the small bads.
-
SMALLER IS BETTER If nations are smaller there are more ‘top slots’ available fo
SMALLER IS BETTER
If nations are smaller there are more ‘top slots’ available for status seekers but each has less free capital available for use in corruption .
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-18 05:27:00 UTC
-
“So Curt. How is this not a new Rothbardian ideal fantasy? Ie which government s
—“So Curt. How is this not a new Rothbardian ideal fantasy? Ie which government specifically are we speaking of taking over, and when we do, how many people do we stack like cordwood for jaywalking?”— Jonathan Page
I can’t respond to all of that in a single comment.But I’ll jump ahead and take a guess your underlying question.
First, natural law prohibits parasitism. Contract law allows for the construction of commons. (that’s what a contract does). The difference between public and private contract law, is that you can prohibit people from consumption and competition, whereas in the market we hope to create consumption and competition.
So we can create commons (like the commons of property rights) that create a good (property rights) by prohibiting consumption of that which one has not obtained through homesteading. transformation, or exchange. We can create parks by allowing passage but not use.(etc). We can create all sorts of commons that one cannot socialize losses against, or privatize. As long as they are not parasitic.
So this prohibits rents but allows investments, including informational rents and investments.
1) Why not a fantasy?
It can be implemented in law – easily I might add, as a set of amendments to the constitution.
2) Which government?
Contractualism.: Rule of natural, common, strictly constructed, judge-discovered law. intergenerational monarchy as veto(judge) of last resort. Market government by voluntary exchange and legal dissent. Market economy by voluntary exchange and legal dissent. Market for reproduction (family) by voluntary exchange and legal dissent. Market for Polities – Rights of association and disassociation.
( Or, as we say ‘markets in everything.)
3) Jaywalking
Well, you know, it turns out that zero tolerance (broken window policing) by individuals and sheriffs is the optimum method of producing prosperity. And we have a lot fewer big ‘bads’ when we eliminate the small bads.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-18 03:44:00 UTC
-
There Is No Reason To Tolerate Burgher (Bourgeoise) Interference in Political Orders
Let’s compare Soros’ activism, with PPPP’s activism against Gawker. The courts can be, if we repair the constitution, a method by which the wealthy can police what the politicians choose not to. This is a good. We have juridical defense in these cases. But why can we not sue Soros for corruption by circumventing the courts, where we have juridical defense? The moment we let the state determine law rahter than terms of contract we surrender to state corruption, and the corruptibility of the state. So far, in the west, we have, at least until the past few generations, been able to preserve the rule of law as sacred natural order beyond which no man may transgress. This is our defense. Not politicians. They are corrupt to the last – because they must be.