Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • WHY DOES UKRAINE NEED EUROPE? OLIGARCHS. Ukraine was always a tax-toy of other s

    WHY DOES UKRAINE NEED EUROPE? OLIGARCHS.

    Ukraine was always a tax-toy of other states.

    Ukraine was subject to horrors under the Soviets.

    Ukraine has been subject to predation and poverty under post soviet oligarchs.

    The Ukrainian government and judiciary is OWNED by the oligarchs – and organized crime (the fantasy of libertarians).

    If the Ukrainian Government tries to take over oligarchs, it is too weak, and Ukraine will fall into civil war, so that the Russians have an excuse to conquer them again, and deprive them of their potential for a high trust society, sovereignty, and nationhood.

    NATO MEANS DEFEAT OF OLIGARCHS AND NATIONHOOD.

    Nato + European integration means defeat of the Oligarchs.

    Defeat of the oligarchs allows Rule of law.

    Rule of law allows credit and risk.

    Credit allows risk via entrepreneurship.

    Entrepreneurship creates prosperity.

    Prosperity saves the Ukrainian people from:

    1) predation by the jews of old

    2) predation by the soviets of the 20th century.

    3) predation by the oligarchs of post soviets.

    And eliminates all value of a Russian conquest.

    PUTIN FAILED. HE COULD HAVE:

    0) Called the Nato leaders personally and told them his plan.(not asked permission)

    1) Burned Yanukovich on a stake for his crimes against the people.

    2) Provided discount gas to ukraine for a 99 year lease on the black sea coastal territories.

    3) Secured the Ukrainian banks that were not already under Russian ownership (few of them)

    4) Crushed the Ukrainian Oligarchs “at the request of the ukrainian people”

    5) Withdrawn back to russian.

    6) Restored the territory, population, trade routes, manufacturing base, and military bases necessary for continued russian restoration of orthodox empire.

    7) Caused russia to be forgiven of past sins under the soviets.

    AND AS A RESULT PUTIN COULD HAVE:

    8) been a fucking world hero, and perhaps the greatest leader of the 21st century.

    9) Removed all necessity for the preservation of NATO.

    10) Saved the world from any nearby chance of another world war.

    Yeah. So. It’s still possible.

    WHY ISN’T HE DOING IT?

    Stupid.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 09:35:00 UTC

  • by Eli Harman The weak assert universal rights and entitlements because they app

    by Eli Harman

    The weak assert universal rights and entitlements because they apply to everyone. You don’t have to win them.

    But someone actually does have to win them. They don’t bring themselves into being. So whether one is speaking of rights, or entitlements, when they are of a universal nature, what is being spoken of is redistribution, from winners, to everyone else.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 06:10:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.defensenews.com/articles/ukraine-parliament-restores-nato-membership-as-strategic-target

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 18:12:00 UTC

  • You see that dark cloud on the horizon? That’s civil war. End the Empire

    You see that dark cloud on the horizon? That’s civil war. End the Empire.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 12:31:00 UTC

  • Is Russia Right About The Fact That The Usa Is The Biggest Threat To Humanity?

    Um. I’m a Ukrainian resident. And you’re liar. Russia invaded ukraine. I was one of the people begging the USA for help in the revolution to be free or Russian corruption. And american government couldn’t care less.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Russia-right-about-the-fact-that-the-USA-is-the-biggest-threat-to-humanity

  • Is Russia Right About The Fact That The Usa Is The Biggest Threat To Humanity?

    Um. I’m a Ukrainian resident. And you’re liar. Russia invaded ukraine. I was one of the people begging the USA for help in the revolution to be free or Russian corruption. And american government couldn’t care less.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Russia-right-about-the-fact-that-the-USA-is-the-biggest-threat-to-humanity

  • The more criticism one attracts, the more publicity one obtains. The more public

    The more criticism one attracts, the more publicity one obtains. The more publicity the bigger the audience. The bigger the audience the more influence. The more influence the more power.

    Generally speaking, most idiots stumble and attract more publicity than the content that they offer can satisfy the wants of new eyes.

    And the opportunity of first impression is wasted.

    All young entrepreneurs try to go to market too early.

    Same thing for radicals.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 18:45:00 UTC

  • ALL MEN WANT TO BE LED. FEW ARE WORTHY OF LEADING. I know my betters when I meet

    ALL MEN WANT TO BE LED. FEW ARE WORTHY OF LEADING.

    I know my betters when I meet them. I want to be led by my betters. If for no other reason than leadership is difficult, uncertain, and I may fail my people.

    We all want to be led. We only want to choose our leaders.

    Choose wisely. Choose your betters.

    I choose the martial aristocracy of christian monarchies.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 12:59:00 UTC

  • WHAT ANSWER DOES THE RIGHT HAVE? It’s not exactly like the Right has a portfolio

    WHAT ANSWER DOES THE RIGHT HAVE?

    It’s not exactly like the Right has a portfolio of philosophers to choose from. Who is there? A bunch of failures who took stylistic clues from christian literature and mixed it with Lovecraft’s occultism? A century and a half of Abrahamic apologists still hopeful that what defeated us in the previous era, what we escaped from, and what the Abrahamists are using to attack us once again, will somehow – like generals fighting the last war – succeed this time despite failing us over and over again in the past?

    What strategy? What plan? What demands? What institutions? What will you change as meaningfully as what rescued us from Supernatural Abrahamism the last time (empiricism) and what can rescue us from SuperRational and Pseudoscientific Abrahamism this time (marxism/socialism/postmodernism/feminism)?

    What military tactics that were required in the age of arrows, in the age of cannon, in the age of rifles, in the age of armor, are now possible and necessary in the current age under the ending of the peace of westphalia where the fragility is not the army, but the infrastructure, and the illusion of power and rule? By what means can the people overthrow the state and restore nation and sovereignty and militia?

    If you are weak. I understand. But you are irrelevant. All that matters is a solution that it is possible to implement, a set of incentives by which to award the common people for changing the status quo, a set of demands to impose upon the state, a strategy for forcing their submission, command and control by which to act, and a minority of men ready to destroy that upon which the current order depends.

    Does anyone out there have anything other, than cunning words?

    No. I know so. Don’t bother pulling wishful thinking out of your backside.

    Rule or be ruled. Rule by force or be ruled by force. Rule by distributed dictatorship of the militia of sovereign men, denying rule to all others. Or be ruled by any one of the alternatives, all of which render you a freeman, serf or slave.

    The strong do not look for approval, permission, or cooperation of the weak. We act, regardless of the approval, or permission, or cooperation of the weak.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 12:54:00 UTC

  • THE IMPOLITIC TRUTH: WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP SIGNAL ORGANIZATIONAL FAILURE (in respo

    THE IMPOLITIC TRUTH: WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP SIGNAL ORGANIZATIONAL FAILURE

    (in response to May, LePen, Clinton, Merkel)

    Women distribute wealth earned by the inventions and aggressions of men. Just as they do to children. They do not resolve conflicts. They do not invent solutions. They cannot lead. They cannot rule.

    Any organization with a woman at its helm, that is not in the business of redistributing wealth or servicing **signals of wealth redistribution** (health, beauty, fitness, fashion) is an indication of organizational failure, and the board’s inability to find a strategic solution to the condition: that the board and shareholders are merely preserving income streams as the organization declines.

    As far as I can tell, this rule is exceptionless. Entrepreneurial competition, economic competition, and political competition, are all warfare by the three means of coercion possible to man: remuneration(business), gossip(politics), and violence(war).

    And with few exceptions, women in charge of companies of any scale fit this rule. Women in politics fit this rule. and female defense ministers (in europe there are a lot of them) fit this rule.

    Women redistribute the wealth earned by the inventions and aggressions of men. If they are in a position to do that, it’s a luxury good. At some point we must understand that such luxury goods are merely *signal* goods that are the result of man-made goods, and not in fact – goods proper.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 07:55:00 UTC