Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • The Federal Military, the State Reserves, the Local Regimental Militia. RESTORE

    The Federal Military, the State Reserves, the Local Regimental Militia.

    RESTORE THE REGIMENTAL SYSTEM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 14:20:00 UTC

  • THE NEW RIGHT. ALL OF US. ALL MEN. YES ITS AWESOME. —“It sounds like you are s

    THE NEW RIGHT. ALL OF US. ALL MEN. YES ITS AWESOME.

    —“It sounds like you are saying that good men of all the classes (working, labor, middle, upper, academic, etc.), in the current disorder, each with their own language, with their own skills and contributions, can come together consciously in the struggle to correct the wrong of egalitarianism, leftism, progressivism (etc.). That would be awesome.”—Todd Ojala

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 14:11:00 UTC

  • THE ALT RIGHT (OR NEW RIGHT) BY CAUSE RATHER THAN LANGUAGE The alt right (or new

    THE ALT RIGHT (OR NEW RIGHT) BY CAUSE RATHER THAN LANGUAGE

    The alt right (or new right) has given up hope of reconciliation and returned to separatism.

    The Hopeful Right of the 18th, 19th, and 20th, centuries have been proven wrong by the evidence. And we have transitions to the Unhopeful Right. And finally, the Resigned Right.

    Why? Because it is not possible to create the enlightenment fantasy of Aristocracy of Everyone.

    Man was not oppressed by the aristocracy. Man was domesticated from beast, to slave, to serf, to freeman, to citizen, and if possible he might, if he possessed sufficient agency, earn his sovereignty among other sovereign men.

    But since man was not oppressed, and man was merely domesticated – like every other plant and animal – many men (and many more women) are not domesticated sufficiently, so that they lack the agency, to join the aristocracy, of sovereign men.

    The problem the anglo middle class man created, was his siezure of the power of the state from the aristocracy under the pretense of oppression rather than the evidence of domestication.

    Through colonialism and then marxist-postmodernism, this error has spread round the world.

    And faced with the evidence, the aristocracy of everyone – the ‘egalitarianism’ – has failed, and the right is abandoning it, and deflating christianity, and returning to the ethics of aristocracy.

    So the redaction of christian universalist ethics of the enlightenment has occurred across all classes, and we are seeing the reactions of different classes from the Nat-Soc labor class, to the alt-right working class, to the nationalist middle class, to the civilizational upper middle class, to the academic class (people like Me, Duchesne, MacDonald, and even to a lesser degree Peterson) all demonstrating our class-communication methods but all of us saying precisely the same thing.

    That the christian universalist era is over, and the myth of the aristocracy of everyone is over. And the myth of the oppressed is over.

    It’s just aristocracy of those of us with agency, and the rest of the barbarian animals that have yet to be domesticated.

    We must only choose whether to fence off the animals, or pay the high cost of domesticating them against their will

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 13:50:00 UTC

  • IMMIGRATION IN A FEDERATION 0) Asylum is ended forever. Peoples must pay the cos

    IMMIGRATION IN A FEDERATION

    0) Asylum is ended forever. Peoples must pay the cost of their own political transformation even if it means their death. This is the only way to force transformation of primitive governments and make kin pay for the survival and transcendence of kin.

    1) Any immigrant must be sponsored by an individual who pays for insurance that guarantees the ‘return’ of any immigrant if he requires costs, or commits any crime whatsoever.

    2) Any region (state) that grants this permission access limits that individual to that region (state). (period). An individual may obtain insurance for access to each other region(state). But no guarantee is substitutable.

    3) All persons under insurance (non citizens) and their offspring remain the responsibility of their insurer of birth. Forcible repatriation is mandatory, and no person may immigrate from countries that prohibit forcible repatriation. ENding anchor babies forever.

    4) Any insurer-of-birth may demand repatriation of any individual at any time, regardless of domestic commitments, and the balance of any insurance returned to the individual, and the insurer shall dispose of any domestic property and return the liquidated value to the individual.

    5) All individuals who do so immigrate shall ‘fully integrate’ in language, dress, manner, and custom or they shall be repatriated within three years. (criminalize non-integration)

    6) An individual may transfer insurer-of-birth (citizenship) and end payment for insurance, after no less than 15 years, if he can demonstrate full integration and sufficient assets to carry himself to end-of-life without burden (cost) on the rest of the population.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 13:30:00 UTC

  • RESTORING THE PRIVATE CIVIC, NORMATIVE, COMPETITIVE, ORDER. Well, Yes, I am inte

    RESTORING THE PRIVATE CIVIC, NORMATIVE, COMPETITIVE, ORDER.

    Well, Yes, I am intentionally screwing with people by asking the question under the guise of church. Because I suspected the reaction I got. And therefore people are so anchored that it is impossible.

    2) If instead, I said, “If schools, in which we invest heavily in intergenerational activities, providing a service we cannot do without (education), shortened their school hours, but expanded their functions, so that they had a weekly ‘feast’ (food) after which they taught weekly family ‘lessons’ using the great myths and virtues in the form of literary interpretation; and served broader civic functions like fitness, registries of birth, property, and death; Credit Union with zero interest consumer loans; and armory of the militia; would we be able to restore the civic society with many such ‘shareholder organizations’? Secondly, could we repurpose our many declining and abandoned churches, and related property, for this purpose, to preserve their architecture?”

    In other words, can we recreate the civic society out of multiple private institutions, that are necessary because they provide necessary functions?

    Is this a possible institutional solution(normative government)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-14 21:29:00 UTC

  • WHY IS HE POSTING THIS? London: One fire. 40 Trucks. What happens when there are

    WHY IS HE POSTING THIS?

    London: One fire. 40 Trucks.

    What happens when there are 40 fires?

    Explosions are just drama. They occur and are over.

    Fire keeps working for you as long as its burning.

    Fire is the best investment in revolution.

    Interruption of Roads, Telecom, Power, and Water provide the best discount on fire.

    Explosions are expensive and a bad return.

    Fire, roofing nails, a bit of chain, transformers, and ATM’s give amazing returns.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-14 08:15:00 UTC

  • Since, like the chinese system demonstrated knowledge of the political system is

    Since, like the chinese system demonstrated knowledge of the political system is demonstrably harmful compared to the british requirement for demonstrated SUCCESS in the production of the private and common before one could participate in the political process.

    The political process is relatively meaningless. It is a market for favors within a market for divvying up the spoils of population density.

    So while we originally had a ‘house’ for each class: the monarchy (‘private governor of last resort’), the regional nobility (private ‘governors’ of regional businesses), the house of commons (‘private governors of homes – small businesses’) we now have majority rule by women and the peasantry.

    Where Jefferson’s intention was to widen the net of enfranchisement as widely as possible because nearly everyone participated in the markets (owned property, farmed), but where the lower classes (slave, ‘serf’, employee) who were not successful at responsibility for others, had no influence – today what percentage of people demonstrate responsibility for (a) the business of the home (b) a small or medium business, (c) a large business or region. And what percentage of people are outside of the market where goods and services must perform? (media, schools, academy, state bureaucracies, and employees of most businesses).

    So the question is not *who knows how the government works* (since it’s a trivial question), but *who can produce demonstration of knowledge of how the world works, such that we minimize the damage that slaves, serfs, employees, bureaucrats, and intellectuals, who don’t have any warranty of responsibility cannot do the damage to our civilization*

    It is one thing to say we should not have mob rule. It is another thing to say we should have ‘reported pretense of understanding’, and quite another that has DEMONSTRATED application of understanding.

    In other words, a bureaucracy with ‘reporting’ epistemology is just another self-reinforcing fantasy priesthood (like the postmodern academy) while a DEMONSTRATED epistemology provides a the only scientific method of selecting people for the operation of a government.

    Reasoning is nothing without empirical, operational, rational, reciprocal, and fully accounted for tests of one’s reasoning. Reason is just another form of fantasy literature.

    It’s acting with it as a formula that decides the veracity of the literature.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-14 08:08:00 UTC

  • The academy is happy to talk to the upper middle class, but who is actually work

    The academy is happy to talk to the upper middle class, but who is actually working for the middle, working, and upper laboring classes: the moral people?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-13 19:49:00 UTC

  • A SILENT GOVERNMENT IS EVEN BETTER THAN A SMALL ONE (from elsewhere) Nina. Your

    A SILENT GOVERNMENT IS EVEN BETTER THAN A SMALL ONE

    (from elsewhere)

    Nina.

    Your proposal is doesn’t address the cause: 0) that the only commons governments must produce are those that cannot be produced by private means. 1) that our constitutions do not require sufficient legislation consist of ‘business plans’ for any commons produced, or their life cycle, nor the means of insuring their upkeep. 2) that ‘contracts for commons’ (legislation) are arbitrarily voidable by the legislature at whims, and that this is the problem of a weak constitution and majoritarianism over rule of law. 3) that the incentive of legislatures and bureaucrats is to ‘do something new’ and award their voters (not to keep something beautiful and serviceable). 4) that because of 2 and 3, legislatures rotate funds across each new generation of ‘new’ projects at the expense of old, creating a sea of hazards (decay) behind them. 5) that outsourcing customer service to the private sector with demanding measurable requirements by the government, appears to provides far better service than government employees, for more open hours, with greater public recourse (govt should be required to keep retail hours – period), but that outsourcing maintenance of the physical plant appears not to. 6) that the public’s general concern is not government management but the (excessive,exhaustive,offensive) rents obtained by government employees that service the public in correlation with the service hours, quality of customer service, and constant rotation of investment between commons.

    Secondly, It is very hard to argue that the government should ‘instruct or educate’ anyone. In fact, the evidence is almost universal that the opposite is true, and that government should be entirely prohibited from informing and educating people. It’s very difficult to argue that it’s not small government as much as silent government that operates on retail hours with retail levels of service that is the problem.

    Thirdly, It is very hard to argue that government should continue the use of redistributive, fiscal, and monetary policy rather than directly distribute liquidity to the population by debit card, and circumvent the financial and public services systems entirely. The worst public private partnership is the purely extractive one of charging interest for the distribution of purely electronic liquidity. The government need not operate as if currency and money are the same thing, or that fiat money is anything other than tradable shares in the economy open to constant dilution.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-13 14:01:00 UTC

  • WE ARE NO LONGER FIGHTING THE LAST WAR (important) —“This has been concerning

    WE ARE NO LONGER FIGHTING THE LAST WAR

    (important)

    —“This has been concerning me for some time. We are becoming that which we fight against, both SJW and Muslim at the same time.”—

    Another way of looking at it is (a) we are no longer fighting the last war (b) we are finally completing the enlightenment and ending the last vestiges of our conquest by abrahamic christianity. (c) we are restoring our original identity.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-12 18:10:00 UTC