Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • “ITS YOUR BODY BUT THIS IS MY POLITY Just as women say ‘it’s my body’ men need t

    “ITS YOUR BODY BUT THIS IS MY POLITY

    Just as women say ‘it’s my body’ men need to say ‘it’s my polity’. Because that’s the end of the story right there. Reproductively, that’s the story in a nutshell.

    So men make women a deal: it’s your body, and children are yours, only as long politics and war are ours. Because it is that compromise (trade) that makes possible the differences in our reproductive strategies. The alternative is that it’s not your body and it’s still our polity. Because in the end, only men choose.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-08 10:10:00 UTC

  • Not sure if you have seen or posted the transcript of Trump’s speech. He says so

    Not sure if you have seen or posted the transcript of Trump’s speech. He says some interesting stuff about nationalism.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-07 06:09:00 UTC

  • Putin probably doesn’t know how to talk to Trump. Trump ‘might’ know how to talk

    Putin probably doesn’t know how to talk to Trump. Trump ‘might’ know how to talk to Putin. You don’t get cunning with Putin or any Russian. You think of something practical. “The world needs us to be allies. How can we get you what you want? what do you need to make that happen?”

    I”m praying anyway.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-06 18:40:00 UTC

  • FEELING VERY FRUSTRATED WITH OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH RUSSIA Putin is doing everyth

    FEELING VERY FRUSTRATED WITH OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH RUSSIA

    Putin is doing everything he can think of to open the door without losing ground.

    And we are being incredibly stupid americans again.

    Data is data is data.

    Have an open public discussion with the russian and american people. That is what needs to happen. The American heartland and the russian heartland are more similar than any other people on earth.

    We must build the trust in one another that we were never able to build in the past.

    WE are the only warriors left in christendom.

    We are the only people’s that can save it.

    But we must work together. Europe is almost gone.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-06 10:36:00 UTC

  • 4) The mistake in english parliament was majority discretionary assent, vs minor

    4) The mistake in english parliament was majority discretionary assent, vs minority legal dissent – overriding common law. (We can fix this)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-06 10:11:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/882904846017449985

    Reply addressees: @AnarchyEnsues @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/882819237009649664

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/882819237009649664

  • 1) Any national militia, with distributed econ. production, under the common law

    1) Any national militia, with distributed econ. production, under the common law of torts, w/ independent judiciary, will produce ‘liberty’.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-06 10:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/882903301678936064

    Reply addressees: @AnarchyEnsues @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/882819237009649664

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/882819237009649664

  • 1) Any national militia, with distributed econ. production, under the common law

    1) Any national militia, with distributed econ. production, under the common law of torts, w/ independent judiciary, will produce ‘liberty’.

    2) The discourse on liberty is byproduct of religion (belief), whereas all existential liberty is byproduct of rule of natural common law.

    3) The challenge for liberty is scale since production of multiplicative competitive commons is the penultimate competitive advantage.

    4) The mistake in english parliament was majority discretionary assent, vs minority legal dissent – overriding common law. (We can fix this)

    5) Ergo the problem of the production of commons under the preservation of liberty can be solved.

    6) But Rothbardianism is merely Marxism for the middle class (jewish separatism) in an attempt to justify parasitism on others’ commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-06 06:15:00 UTC

  • WORST CITIES: Connecticut has some of america’s worst cities: Hartford, Windham,

    WORST CITIES:

    Connecticut has some of america’s worst cities: Hartford, Windham, Derby, Danbury, Meriden, New Britain, New Haven, Bridgeport, Hartford, New London, Waterbury, Willimantic.

    WHY WORST CITIES:

    Rust belt (manual labor) population without major academic, scientific, and financial sector.

    WHY IS CT POOR:

    “White Flight”, “Pensions”, “Taxes”, “General hostility to business.”

    WHY?

    All economics is demographics. Every member of the lower class is six times as costly as every member of the middle class is productive.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-05 19:24:00 UTC

  • “We can celebrate what we love about America while acknowledging and attempting

    —“We can celebrate what we love about America while acknowledging and attempting to correct its errors. And if worst comes to worst, we still have the 2nd. That alone is worth almost all the other bullshit.”—Ely Harman

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-04 20:33:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS THE PLAN TO IMPLEMENT ‘REVOLUTION’? (important) The fact is that as a ph

    WHAT IS THE PLAN TO IMPLEMENT ‘REVOLUTION’?

    (important)

    The fact is that as a philosopher I am not a ‘problem’. But the minute I start talking about operations then I become ‘a problem’. So I will just say that we don’t talk about fight club outside of fight club. That said, if we are successful (meaning me and the other thinkers around me, and the other leadership around us, and the extended movement beyond them), then both the threat will be real enough, and the solution possible enough, and the returns for the labor, working, middle, and upper middle class so substantial, that the ‘talking’ classes will have no choice. Not that they will not fight it. But that they will not be able to win. In the end, I am fairly certain that from the set of available choices I know the outcome that will result out of self interest by the government and the military. We will end up burning the financial sector, the advertising sector, the media, entertainment sector, and the academy, on a pyre of economic and legal disenfranchisement that it will be remembered as an economic version of the french revolution. And hopefully with the same durability in memory for all of history.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-04 09:01:00 UTC