http://blog.independent.org/2017/07/24/socialism-is-dead-participatory-fascism-has-triumphed/FASCISM WON. NOW WE JUST CREATE MERITOCRATIC FASCISM AND WE’RE DONE… 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-26 19:54:00 UTC
http://blog.independent.org/2017/07/24/socialism-is-dead-participatory-fascism-has-triumphed/FASCISM WON. NOW WE JUST CREATE MERITOCRATIC FASCISM AND WE’RE DONE… 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-26 19:54:00 UTC
https://www.change.org/p/australian-government-accept-white-south-african-refugees-to-australia?recruiter=747673393&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=share_petition&utm_term=autopublish&utm_content=nafta_share_post_copy_en_4%3Areal_controlSIGN THIS. BRING PERSECUTED SOUTH AFRICANS TO AUSTRALIA. DRIVE IT OVER 10,000!!!!
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-26 12:08:00 UTC
UM. NO. I THINK LIKE A KING OR A GENERAL AND YOU LIKE A SOLDIER, OR CITIZEN, THAT’S THE DIFFERENCE.
Many criticisms for my lack of ‘spirituality’ one way or another:
—“your material values”—, or —“your bourgeoise values”—
Um. My interest in material values lies in the fact that one must have wealth to afford to invent the technology, with which to arm your people, so that you may defeat enemies both biological, animal, human, conceptual, and the universe itself.
I don’t like the church because I know it is (((a church))) not a sacred grove. I and I know it relies on conflationary (((abrahamic))) fictionalism (lies), rather than
The greeks innovated – particularly with aristotle, zeno, and epicurus, but the athenians (unlike the spartans) were weak. It was the spartans and the Romans that invented modernity, and the greeks ‘moved eastward’ more closely to the persians, semites, and anatolians. What the Spartans and the Athenians held separately the romans combined and eliminated the weaknesses: spartan ‘pragmatism’ and athenian navy and commerce, and aristotelian/stoic(zeno) law. But they abandoned sparta’s economics, abandoned greek idealism, and abandoned stoic ‘individualism’. We are the remains of greek ‘technology’ but roman civilization, which more generally reflects germanic civilization. and I have only come recently to understand how much influence the vikings had. We tend to remember what is written, not what changed state. The vikings ‘resurrected’ europe from defeat by byzantium by the church by giving rise to the Hansa and the north sea trade route and it’s overlands to byzantium and venice.
The romans had it right. More right than the chinese. More right than anyone else ever: (a) aristocracy performed rituals (submission) as a civic obligation, so that people could abandon their hierarchies, for which they obtained status so that others wished to do so as well. (b) the calendar was built to serve the seasons and festivals (celebration) so that the people could abandon their ‘hierarchies’. (c) the polytheistic temple system so that there were ‘gods and demigods and heroes’ for all men of all stations in that hierarchical division of labor. And so that all men could retain gods for their profession, their tribe and their nations, giving only fealty to the polity (empire) through its anthropomorphic representative in the emperor.
They just overextended. We didn’t over extend in the prewar era of colonialism as so much as commit fratricide in our great civil war by the alliance of britain and france and russia against germany. Britain and france with their overseas colonies, russia with her asian colonies, and germany seeking to take the eastern european and some african colonies. This was the mistake: not forcing russia south and assisting germany in expanding east as she had been (and was good for the people).
As far as I can tell, the difference between roman civilization and chinese civilization, is that china’s coastal farming was productive enough and concentrated enough, that they could unite and wall off their empire from the steppe, desert, and jungle peoples. When china over extended she stopped. When she tried to expand (prior to the european expansion) she withdrew to defend her walls from the Mongols. And she discovered enough about the world that she found nothing valuable in it enough to risk her home and her people and her civilization. The chinese are not heroic, risk-embracing and ambitious as much as defensively proud and ambitious.
So I think as a general, not as a soldier or citizen, and this is why you see my materialism: generals worry about technology, strategy, supply lines, and training and equipping men. The truth is that men in battle are marginally indifferent in war. It is the wealth that purchases the equipment, training, supply lines, and the wealth that makes continuous research and development of technology possible that makes the difference in war.
A soldier should defend his people with zeal perhaps – but pursue war to defend his life and kin, and for the spoils and booty that advance him as ordinary commerce cannot.
The peace of westphalia has ended. War is a for profit industry.
I understand the common man.
***But one panders to the common man. One speaks truth to power. And, one does not pander to himself if he wishes to be powerful. And saving and advancing ones people requires power.***
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-26 07:08:00 UTC
What names tremble on the lips of history? We have the opportunity of a lifetime to make lips tremble at our names for thousands of years. Do not fear it. Revel in it.
Revolution comes.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-24 15:02:00 UTC
ON MY CONVERSION TO RADICAL REVOLUTIONARY
(answer one for Dagon)
There are a couple of things that turned me into a revolutionary.
The constant lying by leftist politicians via the media. The constant lying by the media. The fact that I was very well read by the time I got to university, and that I felt that most professors were lying or propagandizing. That when I went into the business world, I worked for three companies that lied aggressively to customers (all jewish fwiw). Then when I worked with at least moderately observant christians it was the opposite.
But it was how I was treated in divorce from a woman who cheated on me, and child support – which I can understand for a year or so but not more so. And I certainly don’t think children or women have a right to previous standards of living. or community property. omg.
Then how courts said I had to hire people by anything other than merit. And that it was illegal to try to discover people’s merit via testing. And then how women have excessive rights in the work place, and that there is no means of defense against it. And that between false unemployment claims, and false sexual harassment claims, and then the all out impossible requirement that CEO’s understand and are accountable for everything their employees do (the impossible), but employees, bureaucrats, (the irs), police, judges, and politicians are not accountable for anything they do.
Then how the courts simply punish the hell out of poor white guys, homeowners, and minivan-mom-drivers who are easy targets, but leave us victims of all sorts of criminals because of costs of imprisoning them.
Then how immigration was used as genocide against my people. I remember what life was like and how it changed, and I know the difference between homogenous and heterogeneous communities and what happens: a reduction in ‘precision’ which accumulates in a reduction of everything that makes a high trust polity possible.
Then how my people were enslaved through fiat money and incrementally exterminated. It is one thing to use upward redistribution to increase the quality of a polity, and it is another to increase downward in redistribution to reduce the quality of the polity. At least the aryan method of upward redistribution produces transcendence in every possible method. But the jewish (levantine) method of downward redistribution produces regression and dysgenia.
Then how every merger and acquisition lawyer and venture capitalist would tell me how to do something immoral in business – and that the better the law firm the more corrupting and immoral the legal advice. Compare that to the two ‘very christian’ female lawyers that would not help me defend against them by advocating feminist equalitarianism among share holders. I felt the world had gone mad.
Then how during the divorce, when I was going in for cancer surgery, the court didn’t care and forced me to settle or delay my surgery until after a trial.
Then how my ex-wife’s lawyer could use art and artifice through the courts to harass me in ways you cannot imagine to the point where I simply needed to leave the country in order to build a business.
And how, during the recession why are landlord contracts given higher weight than other price contracts, when they have only debt service, and why is that debt service more important than other commitments when in fact, it’s all simply credit money (time). Why are creditors treated unequally, and not only unequally but the reverse of risk?
The final blow was two fold 1) when obama criminalized me and thousands of others if we didn’t file a retroactive report on our overseas holdings. Holdings I had paid taxes on. When it was my only defense against the abuse of the courts by my ex-wife’s attorney to harass and blackmail me. And 2) when I had misunderstood a date of the sale of a business and thought the s-corp to c-corp change was done prior to the sale rather than after. While the IRS owed me a quarter of a million dollars refund because of the difference, they froze every asset I had on the globe and nearly destroyed by business and stranded me in a third world country without any money. Yet they told me I had no right of judicial defense unless I would go through a single court in person in california. I ask what was the maximum they could imagine I owed the IRS if I was wrong, and they said no more than 125k, (even though they owed me 250k), I said if they unfroze my assets or simply took 125k, I would send them the 125K, and then, we could correct the paperwork later. But no. So some lower middle class bimbo ex-bill collector can destroy my life without judicial review. And then disappeared for four weeks of government christmas holiday, leaving me no ability to act. Thankfully I had loan due from a small business of 50k, and that carried me for the three months it took to correct it. The truth is none of our irs collections make any difference. Our use of fiat money means that the timeliness of such payments is all but irrelevant. It’s all just power playing on the part of the govt and the bureaucracy.
I left that experience with a lot less hair and an absolute determination to overthrow the current order and restore the constitution of natural law under which no discretionary action is possible without juridical defense, and where the citizen not the government is given the full benefit of the doubt.
So instead of trying to simply produce the missing ‘bible of western civilization’: natural law, I developed a broader plan, and I’ve been working toward that plan, every single waking hour of every single day. And the opportunity to execute that plan is coming closer every day. And I am nothing if not painfully thorough, painfully disciplined, and painfully committed to that plan.
So that incremental unjust tyranny is the reason I became a hostile revolutionary with endless conviction.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-23 13:36:00 UTC
ON CONVERSION FROM OPTIMISTIC LIBERTARIANISM TO PESSIMISTIC SOVEREIGNTY
(answer two for dagon)
The Anglo classical liberalism of the enlightenment was profoundly optimistic about both British future, their responsibility, and the nature of man. All the enlightenment thinkers were optimistic – other than the germans. They were cautious. They handled their caution by secularizing religion and retaining the conflation of christianity, where the anglo world had deflated (separated) religion(family and polity) and law(commerce and science) into their usual markets.
But as the world wars hit us, we lost our convictions. The marxists, bolsheviks, and socialists were rallying our people against us with the promise of achievable wealth and equality, and inverting the social order in ways that the Church attempted but never could have imagined with promise of life after death, and at least the protection from the aristocracy by the church – and where the aristocracy would have exterminated more aggressively than Henry the 8th the monasteries, and thereby freed up vast capital held frozen by the backwardness of the church. (And where we will shortly have to exterminate the church-of-state we call secular anti-aristocratic-family socialism.)
I am, by nature, a libertarian. I hate conflict. I like cooperation. I like people to be happy. I am overly generous by nature – which I should add, has not been good for me. My great joys have been creating successful companies and watching people prosper in them.
But as I have learned through experience at all levels of society from my personal, to professional, to entrepreneurial, to financial, to economic, and to political – and now philosophical, I have come to understand a few very key issues.
1) Our genes drive us so all political persuasion/discourse is meaningless.
2) No one can be converted away from their genetic strategy. Many men can be because we form a hierarchy that is interdependent and so middle and lower men require middle and upper men to form an ‘army’. Women CAN be marginally converted to meritocracy, if all required to be married to bear children or vote. But otherwise vote anti-meritocratically (equalitarian) and in effect ‘marry the state’ thereby destroying the compromise between male and female reproductive strategies that we call the family: the smallest possible tribe in which men and women are both alphas.
3) Majoritarian democracy forces the policy of persuasion which is meaningless, and therefore forces all of us to lie cheat in public policy rather than to use the houses of government as a means for exchange between peoples with very different interests.
4) Aristocracy(meritocracy) is incompatible with democracy since there are always fewer competent than incompetent (Pareto rule). The end result of Democracy is authoritarian communism. As such the minority strategy of opposing the aristocracy via enfranchisement with the larger middle class was used by the larger lower classes against the middle and upper. And the end result is the destruction of western civilization by the combination of abrahamic religion and democratic equality.
5) The Abrahamic program from its origin by the jews (resistance to the aristocracy), the christians (undermining the aristocracy), and the muslims (openly conquering the aristocracy) , to the marxists (openly revolting against the aristocracy by promise of more returns) to the postmoderns (openly revolting against the aristocracy by poisoning the informational commons and the basis for meritocracy:merit not only of self but of family) – this program has been intentionally composed in both the ancient (Constantine thru Justinian) and in the modern (marx thru Derrida) as a method of destroying the aristocracy.
6) The destruction of the aristocracy in Greece, Persia, the Levant, North Africa, and India was complete, leaving only Europe and east Asia standing. The attempt by the marxists and postmoderns has succeeded in Germany, France, and Russia. It has succeeded in Canada and Australia. But because of our dependence on the martial class in America and Britain, it has had a greater difficulty here. So the problem is that (a) the prosecutions by the romans and the nazis was not severe and complete enough to save western civlization. What has been interesting is Putin’s prosecution of them, which is why (had he not flinched in Ukraine) he was and is setting the example for the west. Whereas china has no qualms at all about suppression. The fundamental problem most of the world faces, is that other than china we are not suppressing islam as we need to: totally. Which is why I want to suppress all abrahamism totally by suppressing all false speech in public.
So as I have learned that discourse is fruitless I have ended my interest in voluntaryism in favor of natural law and markets in everything, which solve the problem of differences in interests by the competition between total positive market and total negative law.
And as I have learned how the abrahamists have used the art of suggestion using overloading, conflation and fictionalism, against eugenic meritocracy, truth, and aristocracy, I have changed my focus on private property to the entire suite of capital (property in toto), and changed my bias toward unregulated speech, to demand for warranty of due diligence against false and immoral speech.
This results in basically ‘Fascism of Markets including Truth and Morality in Actions, Display, and Speech – thereby making other than meritocracy impossible to survive.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-23 13:33:00 UTC
THE WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENT COMPETITION
It’s a world-wide competition by governments to see who can make the population dumbest, fattest, most pliable, and most taxed indentured-credit slave-labor ostensibly for an abstract ‘common good’ – the consequence is to overwhelm the carrying capacity, and to drive us to extinction.
(it’s freaking insane. the eugenicists were right.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-23 08:15:00 UTC
London school: statistical management of estates scaled too fast to be governed by natural law.– Josh Jeppson
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 11:27:00 UTC
REVIEW OF CATO
I work full time on the cause of creating a condition of liberty, through an existential condition of sovereignty. And while I agree that CATO tries to influence policy, I never interact with CATO. I never use research from CATO. And I think CATO’s tepid attempts at educating (as does LvMI) has been one of serial failure.
My position on CATO is that it was formed during the ‘hopeful’ generation. And that we have now transitioned into the ‘hopeless’ generation. And we have moved rapidly into ‘hopeless’ – a cold civil war. And with the next correction or election cycle, we may easily and quickly move into a hot civil war.
So my opinion is that CATO, its members, participants, and donors are as out of touch with the current state of the polity and the severity of the worldwide shift in demographics, economics, real power, and political trends.
And that they are throwing money in a hole in the political water so to speak.
Why? There is no way to obtain liberty except through sovereignty in fact, by the use of a militia as the majority component of the military, the limit of enfranchisement to demonstrated contribution to family, industry, and commons, and a constitution of the natural law of reciprocity, strictly constructed, limited to stated original intent, and textually interpreted, with judicial veto prior to asset, and return-to-legislature for those cases impossible to resolve without juridical discretion.
LvMI starts with the presumption of an impossible condition of anarchy with minimum commons that requires a major state to protect it. Cato starts with the presumption of the possibility of successful classical liberalism despite its demonstrated failure immediately upon the Louisiana Purchase. The Heritage Foundation starts with the presumption of the possibility of reasonable persuasion of the unemployable, marginally employable, single mother, and under classes. But the science is very simple: People vote their evolutionary necessities and meritocracy is only in the interest of those capable of fruitful life in the current international condition.
In that circumstance, the rule of law of reciprocity is adequate defense of the dependent class, but they may not be given offense against the productive classes through enfranchisement. It is not even clear that representative government is even viable beyond the regional government.
The intellectual work to be done is in researching the means by which all discretion is removed from the federal government and devolved to the states or regions, and where the only services of the federal government are those of insurer of last resort: the military, the treasury, the insurance against hardship and catastrophe, and a judiciary limited to conflicts of trade – thereby removing powers of legislation of norms from the central government.
If you are not working on fixing the problem of the failures of the american experiment you are simply wasting time, money, effort, and the remaining capital of western civilization.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-21 18:22:00 UTC
MARTIAL SOVEREIGNTY VS BURGHER LIBERTY
Basic law of Sovereignty vs Liberty.
You exercise your will, you don’t ask permission.
You attack and cause your opponent to defend, you don’t request that he fence you.
You question why your opponent is fit to live, rather than assume he has any value.
You seek reason not to kill or enslave, not whether he wishes to cooperate or not.
Why? Because the only answer to these questions is that PERFECT cooperation (productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange) is the only condition more beneficial than that predation.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-18 13:58:00 UTC