Theme: Governance

http://www.scifiwright.com/2017/07/doctor-of-common-sense-and-zo/FOR LIBERTARIAN AND CONSERVATIVE CRITICS OF THE ALT RIGHT AND NEW RIGHT

The evidence of the failure of libertarianism and conservatism is provided by the fact that conservatives have ONLY produced moral literature of moral equivocation and naturalistic fallacy, and NEVER produced a rational, or ratio-scientific literature with which to defend themselves against Abrahamism and Platonism in the ancient world (judaism/christianity/islam), or Abrahamism in the modern world (classical liberal equalitarianism(Middle Class), Feminism(Women), Marxism(Labor), or Postmodern Identitarianism(Slaves)) – or against the methods of argument used in deceitful discourse (Pseudo-Myth(Supernaturalism), Pseudo-Rationalism(Platonic Idealism, Postmodern Lit.), and Pseudo-Science (Boazianism, Marxism, Freudianism,Cantorianism).

The Alt Right has adopted the techniques of the marxists and postmodernists which is to abandon reason and merely propagandize, rally, shame ridicule, silence by volume, poisoning any discourse it can intrude upon in order to hindre emotional momentum, and directly engaging in opposition violence when possible, and to defeat the left when possible by letting the left demonstrate their character.

The New Right (Myself) has abandoned the classical liberal project, the presumption of hopefulness that political bias is other than expression of individual and group evolutionary strategy: a proxy for war. And that any further debate is futile, and that only violence to bring about the restoration of the traditional compromises between the genders and classes – and if not possible, return to the subjugation of female genders and under classes. But that the status quo or the left’s further conquest of the west (for the second time) is not tolerable – even less tolerable than civil war.

Now like any movement there are a tiny number of thought leaders, a small number of ideological leaders, a large number of agitators, communicators, and propagandists, and even larger numbers of sympathizers and advocates, and the main body of interested but uncommitted followers. As one would expect, the right does not consolidate into a single equalitarian body (as do females), but separates into tribes (as do males) using their own sentiments, language, arguments, and leaders. Right and men seek hunting packs with similar but specific agendas designed for rapid change, not a herd (and women and underclasses) with a loose directional agenda of incremental but continuous improvement.

On the alt right, (although they dislike this analysis intensely), it is fairly clear that the tribes have organized around class lines (and rougnly IQ) and method of argument that *reflects their social competency*. And that evidence appears as the the nat-soc(threats), green-frogs(antagonism), masculinists and rationalists (resistance), classical liberals and traditionalists (active opposition), various scientists HBD, RR, etc (refutation), Rule of Law/philosophers(Solution Definition), Traditionalists (wishful thinkers – historical escapists), literary occultists like evola, nietzsche ( literary escapists / shamers), and techo-libertarians (tech escapists), new-age/pseudoscientists (conspiracy theorists and pseudoscience escapists).

My opinion, as someone who has seen this transition (cycle) coming, and worked on it for many years, is that for the tribes of men to unite, those men need (a) a moral license, (b) a solution to demand (c) a plan of transition to the new solution (d) a strategy, tactics, and leadership by which to raise the cost of the status quo, until the demanded solution or a compromise is met. In other words, men need an objective to fight for using the methods of conflcit that they know how to employ. And our job is to succeed where the conservatives in ALL THEIR ITERATIONS since Burke first launched his criticism, have FAILED TO PRODUCE.

We are in a cold civil war. That civil war can turn hot at any moment. I expect it to. The question is, who has that solution?

Or rather, who ELSE has that solution?

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

=====

IN RESPONSE TO: