Theme: Governance
-
YES I ADVISE MALE ACTIVIST RELOCATION TO UKRAINE, POLAND, AND RUSSIA
YES I ADVISE MALE ACTIVIST RELOCATION TO UKRAINE, POLAND, AND RUSSIA -
YES I ADVISE MALE ACTIVIST RELOCATION TO UKRAINE, POLAND, AND RUSSIA
YES I ADVISE MALE ACTIVIST RELOCATION TO UKRAINE, POLAND, AND RUSSIA -
YES I ADVISE MALE ACTIVIST RELOCATION TO UKRAINE, POLAND, AND RUSSIA
YES I ADVISE MALE ACTIVIST RELOCATION TO UKRAINE, POLAND, AND RUSSIA
Source date (UTC): 2017-09-05 08:46:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2017-09-03 12:55:00 UTC
-
“The biggest practical problem we face is bad parenting. The children of high In
—“The biggest practical problem we face is bad parenting. The children of high Investment Parenting today will be the rulers in 2040. Idiocracy is the most important political influence affecting the ground.”–Durfee House
(Parenting like Soldiering is a non-substitutable good.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-09-01 10:57:00 UTC
-
THE WISDOM OF RUSSIAN TOLERANCE: BUYING TIME. Russian tolerance for judaism and
THE WISDOM OF RUSSIAN TOLERANCE: BUYING TIME.
Russian tolerance for judaism and islam is the same as christian monarchic tolerance for judaism and Islam: when minorities have no access to political power, and you have a state-sponsored, state-owned church, and you have democracy in name only, then it’s possible to USE minorities but not be threatened by them – they have no access to power. And as we saw with the oligarchs, if they obtain it, they can easily lose it. The strong rule.
Now, whether this remains true over time is something else. It’s doubtful Russians will tolerate islamic levels of ignorance spreading into in their society. They will continue to contain it. And it’s possible Russian leadership is just buying time – from what I understand, that’s the case. Because in twenty years, at current rates of reform – especially reforming rule of law in matters commercial and personal – despite the sanctions, Russia will be a major power again – at least in military, petroleum, and resources. And she will have an advantage: a small population. Which is not something that other nations understand. In a post-market economy, where technology has been equilibrated around the world, then a large territory, lots of resources, and a small population and an exemplary military are the most valuable assets.
Why? Population – especially below 90IQ – has become a burden again. Whether russian leadership and thought leadership understands this or not is not something I am privy to. However, *it is the right strategy for them, and for Christendom*.
The Intermarium may choose to go west to the germanic, or east to the finno-russian, or remain lithuanian-polish-ukrainian-czech. I would suggest that latin, germanic, intermarium, and russian civilizations would be more powerful as separate cultures than homogenized.
The only problem is “how do we import german police and judges?” Because that is, largely, the world’s problem with modernity. They cannot create rule of law. Because they cannot evolve a militia into a judiciary, sheriff and police force without even greater risk of instability. This is the only way to end corruption: the ‘economic privilege’ of the military, judicial, sheriff, and police class must be maintained in order to suppress corruption. And this requires a smaller ‘professional’ military, judicial training via the military ethic, and staffing of sheriff (of the court) and police (of the region), and a large militia ‘reserve’ (of the nation). As long as that hierarchy polices its members, and as long as they are well paid, then corruption can be suppressed. But without it – it can’t.
The military protects the people from outsiders. the judiciary and the sheriffs protect the people from the state, and the police protect the people from each other. Russia will succeed because like the japanese, they do not place the market about the nation. Which is the opposite westerners, who place the market above the nation – causing their own demise.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-31 13:48:00 UTC
-
CONSERVATIVES: THOSE WHO BEAR THE BURDEN OF EVERYONE ELSE’S LIBERTY A Socialist
CONSERVATIVES: THOSE WHO BEAR THE BURDEN OF EVERYONE ELSE’S LIBERTY
A Socialist will fight, but not compete in the market, nor bear the cost of norms. A libertarian will compete in the market but not fight, nor bear the cost of norms. A conservative will both fight and compete in the market and bear the cost of norms and laws that place the inter generational family ahead of the temporal individual. As far as I can see conservatives are the only people willing to pay the cost of their Sovereignty, other’s Liberty, Freedom, and Charity. Everyone else is a fraud. Those who fight earn. Everyone else is a free rider.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-30 13:35:00 UTC
-
I’m not trying to compromise, but revolt and separate so we cooperate by market
I’m not trying to compromise, but revolt and separate so we cooperate by market rather than suffer under monopoly majority rule.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-30 13:28:00 UTC
-
REVOLUTION COMES —-“Seriously, this is all out of Alinsky’s “Rules for Radical
REVOLUTION COMES
—-“Seriously, this is all out of Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals.” Go back and review the Glenn Beck programs of 2012-2014…when he presented some very good information on the Weather Underground (particularly Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers), as well as Cloward and Piven, and all the “outstanding” work by Van Jones to topple the system. I’m not a personal fan of Beck’s, but back then he used to have very comprehensive layouts that were easily referenced and noted that concerned these Marxists and Communists marching under the banner and guise of “social justice.” All that stuff that Van Jones had planned back then, with funding from Acorn and George Soros…it is manifesting itself here and now.
There is a civil war coming, as it is the domestic initiative that must be pursued to bring the United States down to the canvas…rendering her ineffective when the foreign initiative…an attack comes…to give the final count. In both battles, nobody will be able to retreat to a neutral corner. If the U.S. stays intact, then the NWO loses, and vice-versa. These protestors (paid and genuine) are but a sampling of the platter to be served…a buffet right out of Pandora’s box.”—–
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-29 09:34:00 UTC
-
This is the real question of the 21st century, isn’t it? Just how capable are co
This is the real question of the 21st century, isn’t it? Just how capable are common people of political judgement without demonstrated success in war, family, and commerce, and therefore possessed out of achievement, with skin in the game?
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-28 13:46:00 UTC