Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • by Vincent Deschenes 1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Natio

    by Vincent Deschenes 1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Nations. Lolbertarianism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of nations. 2. Globalism: Open borders and mass immigration. Lolbertarianism: Open borders and mass immigration. 3. Globalism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist. Lolbertarianism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist. 4. Globalism: Multiculturalism, multi-racialism is strength. Lolbertarianism: Multiculturalism/multi-racialism is strength. Conclusion. Radical individualism may serve to further the advancement of globalism, it is controlled opposition. This is not an issue where a middle ground exists, either you’re opposed to Globalism or you’re not, either you don’t recognize the importance of nations or you do, either you wish to preserve nations or you don’t.

  • facebook.comНаціональні ДружиниIN UKRAINE THE “NATIONAL TEAM” (or SQUAD) Pronoun

    facebook.comНаціональні ДружиниIN UKRAINE THE “NATIONAL TEAM” (or SQUAD)

    Pronounced:

    …. natsionalʹni druzhyny

    …. nat-see-uhn-AL-nee, drew-zh-ee-nee

    Facebook Page

    …. https://www.facebook.com/ndrugua

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-13 16:16:00 UTC

  • Національні Дружиниfacebook.comIN UKRAINE THE “NATIONAL TEAM” (or SQUAD) Pronoun

    Національні Дружиниfacebook.comIN UKRAINE THE “NATIONAL TEAM” (or SQUAD)

    Pronounced:

    …. natsionalʹni druzhyny

    …. nat-see-uhn-AL-nee, drew-zh-ee-nee

    Facebook Page

    …. https://www.facebook.com/ndrugua

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-13 16:16:00 UTC

  • “In short, Adams says Trump is a “master persuader” and that his style involves

    —“In short, Adams says Trump is a “master persuader” and that his style involves making exaggerated claims, fewer facts, and triggering a reciprocity response from the other to fill those gaps at their expense.”—Andrew Clayton

    Yep.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 20:27:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1006634205932130304

  • “The 90s was a mess because we were still supporting petty dictators, and not-re

    —“The 90s was a mess because we were still supporting petty dictators, and not-really-allies worldwide – continuing the momentum from the Cold War. We still haven’t shed all of them. Now we need to shed all these allies-in-name-only or force them to be true allies in every way.”— Greg Hamilton

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 16:29:00 UTC

  • @POTUS @realDonaldTrump #Trump #TrumpKimSummit

    @POTUS @realDonaldTrump #Trump #TrumpKimSummit https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1006175276622143488

  • @POTUS @realDonaldTrump #Trump #TrumpKimSummit

    @POTUS @realDonaldTrump #Trump #TrumpKimSummit https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1006360600132415491

  • by Vincent Deschenes 1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Natio

    by Vincent Deschenes

    1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Nations.

    Lolbertarianism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of nations.

    2. Globalism: Open borders and mass immigration.

    Lolbertarianism: Open borders and mass immigration.

    3. Globalism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist.

    Lolbertarianism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist.

    4. Globalism: Multiculturalism, multi-racialism is strength.

    Lolbertarianism: Multiculturalism/multi-racialism is strength.

    Conclusion.

    Radical individualism may serve to further the advancement of globalism, it is controlled opposition.

    This is not an issue where a middle ground exists, either you’re opposed to Globalism or you’re not, either you don’t recognize the importance of nations or you do, either you wish to preserve nations or you don’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 09:04:00 UTC

  • TRUMP’S RETURN TO A MULTI-POLAR WORLD by Bill Joslin Under a unipolar world (US

    TRUMP’S RETURN TO A MULTI-POLAR WORLD

    by Bill Joslin

    Under a unipolar world (US exceptionalism) satellite states, it as I call them vassal states, play an important role. Vassals are proxies for US to do what the US can’t directly.

    Inversely vassals play a role for secondary players for the same reason.

    Trump is forcing a return to a multi-variable world (which is what Putin and China have been advocating – mutlipilar world under international law – internationalist opposed to globalists.

    So in one hand trump is saying to the vassals “we don’t need you anymore, it cost more to retain you then the benefits you proivde.

    And the rest try to poise themselves a soveriegn nations on equal footing when they have never been anything but vassals at the heel of a king – they’ve never really been soveriegn – only had the pretense of it in exchange for fealty to the empire (for Canada, to England first than a shift to the US in 1957 – for the rest under NATO etc).

    Here’s the thing – many nations.may fall in standard of living, but in exchange gain an opportunity to actually be soveriegn nations operating in reality versus vassal states living in pretense.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 22:42:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGIN OF TRUMP’S NEGOTIATING STRATEGY: COLD WAR HOSTILE NEGOTIATIONS Again,

    THE ORIGIN OF TRUMP’S NEGOTIATING STRATEGY: COLD WAR HOSTILE NEGOTIATIONS

    Again, Trump takes the WORST POSSIBLE NUMBER and states it, thereby FORCING THE PRESSS TO CORRECT HIM, and as a consequence USING THE PRESS to promote his agenda.

    Trump plays the press like a fiddle.

    He did this same strategy all through the campaign and has continued it all through his presidency, and he owns the dialog because of it.

    He knows exactly what he is doing which is why he is such an amazing hostile negotiator. He always forces the other side to own the facts, and in doing so explain their position.

    I mean, you can actually study these techniques (I have) but he’s a master of them.

    If you study how cold war intelligence organizations conducted hostile negotiations, that’s where trump took his lessons.

    Read how Arafat negotiated. Hostile. Brilliant.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 22:20:00 UTC