(School in my son’s neighborhood went on lock down because of a black bear. Remember when when we carried rifles to school? We could do that when were were homogenous.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 11:50:00 UTC
(School in my son’s neighborhood went on lock down because of a black bear. Remember when when we carried rifles to school? We could do that when were were homogenous.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 11:50:00 UTC
—“Republicans own guns to protect themselves from Democrats.” — Scott Adams
(h/t John Mark )
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 11:38:00 UTC
PANDORA’S BOX OF DEMOCRACY
There are always weak men. They are never sufficient in numbers, and easily shamed by the strong. There are however far too many weak women, and they will not be shamed by the strong, only doubling-down on their impulses. As such, opening Pandora’s Box by the inclusion of women into the process of political decisions, without expressly limiting the impulses of women, allowed for the combination of weak men, weak women, and those who would profit from enabling weak men and weak women – the inverse of those who traditionally carried the burden to shaming and policing weak men and weak women.
A separate house for women would have done it.
Limiting the vote to married households would have done it.
Limiting the vote to married households with children and property would have done it best of all.
But while as families we share common interests, as individuals we do not.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 11:38:00 UTC
THE RULE OF THREES:
Three minutes without oxygen
Three days without water
Three weeks without food
NOW ADD:
three hours of power
three days of water
three weeks of food.
three months of order.
three years of habitual memory.
Police, fire, and emergency are staffed for steady state, not extremes. Local extremes require national resources. Multiple local extremes overloads national resources.
Expectations determine behavior under stress.
Remove expectation of ‘this will end’ and remove support for the status quo. *people will do anything to restore order*.
Very simple rules of revolution.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 11:28:00 UTC
—“Where we’re going we won’t need voting.”—Moritz Bierling
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-15 19:46:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1007710990291668993
I am, unfortunately, firmly convinced, that women vote for whomever they are least not attracted to – and like everything else, merely justify it. Those who vote by party, vote economically.
Pandora was the horror the ancients warned us of.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-15 16:57:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1007668440595947522
—“Where we’re going we won’t need voting.”—Moritz Bierling
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-15 15:46:00 UTC
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/06/austrias-chancellor-gets-death-threats-after-closing-down-mosqueshttps://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/06/austrias-chancellor-gets-death-threats-after-closing-down-mosques
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-14 16:09:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-14 16:09:00 UTC
by Vincent Deschenes 1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Nations. Lolbertarianism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of nations. 2. Globalism: Open borders and mass immigration. Lolbertarianism: Open borders and mass immigration. 3. Globalism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist. Lolbertarianism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist. 4. Globalism: Multiculturalism, multi-racialism is strength. Lolbertarianism: Multiculturalism/multi-racialism is strength. Conclusion. Radical individualism may serve to further the advancement of globalism, it is controlled opposition. This is not an issue where a middle ground exists, either you’re opposed to Globalism or you’re not, either you don’t recognize the importance of nations or you do, either you wish to preserve nations or you don’t.