Theme: Governance

  • “DHS does not have a blanket policy of separating families at the border. Howeve

    “DHS does not have a blanket policy of separating families at the border. However, DHS does have a responsibility to protect all minors in our custody. This means DHS will separate adults and minors under certain circumstances.

    These circumstances include:

    1) when DHS is unable to determine the familial relationship,

    2) when DHS determines that a child may be at risk with the parent or legal guardian, or

    3) when the parent or legal guardian is referred for criminal prosecution.”

    (Via Adam Voight)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 09:46:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle Tech has skin in the game. Media doesn’t. Tech has credibility. M

    Curt Doolittle

    Tech has skin in the game. Media doesn’t.

    Tech has credibility. Media doesn’t.

    Tech is idealistic. So is Media.

    Tech is egoistic. So is Media.

    Tech is optimistic. Media is pessimistic.

    We’re are going to solve both problems at once.

    With Free Truthful Speech, and Warranty of Your Speech, and Restitution plus Punishment for False Speech.

    The century of propaganda is ended.

    No more gossip and lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 12:29:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/392577-spotlight-falls-on-russian-threat-to-undersea-cableshttp://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/392577-spotlight-falls-on-russian-threat-to-undersea-cableshttp://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/392577-spotlight-falls-on-russian-threat-to-undersea-cables


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 23:49:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/392577-spotlight-falls-on-russian-threat-to-undersea-cableshttp://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/392577-spotlight-falls-on-russian-threat-to-undersea-cables


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 23:49:00 UTC

  • 8) Closing: most problems with common law of tort arose because the state interv

    8) Closing: most problems with common law of tort arose because the state intervened in the law, and deprived the citizenry of standing in matters of the commons. (See England, Coal, Mills).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 20:08:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008441212876083200

    Reply addressees: @elonmusk @michaelshermer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008124944289370113


    IN REPLY TO:

    @elonmusk

    @michaelshermer Direct democracy by the people. Laws must be short, as there is trickery in length. Automatic expiration of rules to prevent death by bureaucracy. Any rule can be removed by 40% of people to overcome inertia. Freedom.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008124944289370113

  • 7) Non-retroactivity, Universal Applicability, and Universal Standing, and in pa

    7) Non-retroactivity, Universal Applicability, and Universal Standing, and in particular, Universal Standing in matters of the Commons (prevents circumvention of the judiciary as a limit on markets and therefore prevent possibility of corruption.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 20:06:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008440760931422209

    Reply addressees: @elonmusk @michaelshermer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008124944289370113


    IN REPLY TO:

    @elonmusk

    @michaelshermer Direct democracy by the people. Laws must be short, as there is trickery in length. Automatic expiration of rules to prevent death by bureaucracy. Any rule can be removed by 40% of people to overcome inertia. Freedom.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008124944289370113

  • The New Right Is the Scientific Right

    CONSERVATIVES (ARISTOCRACY) WERE FROZEN IN ANCIENT ARGUMENT THE NEW RIGHT IS THE SCIENTIFIC RIGHT Conservatives were stuck with a moral, religious, traditional set of arguments without themselves understanding why our civilization had ‘sped faster than the rest’. Worse, they bought into the lie just as libertarians bought into the lie of an aristocracy (sovereignty) of everyone. THE NEW RIGHT = SCIENTIFIC RIGHT. The alt right uses ridicule, but by and large the new right differs from the old right in that we now have DATA and we have it from a century of failures with the falsehoods of classical liberalism, and the falsehoods of marxist-postmodernism. My work is just going back to our roots: impose the law with violence and incrementally suppress all transgressions of it. Men will naturally insure kin, so create nation states, or at least small local polities in the Swiss model with federal governments providing only reciprocal decidability over inter-state conflicts, and acting as insurer of last resort.

  • The New Right Is the Scientific Right

    CONSERVATIVES (ARISTOCRACY) WERE FROZEN IN ANCIENT ARGUMENT THE NEW RIGHT IS THE SCIENTIFIC RIGHT Conservatives were stuck with a moral, religious, traditional set of arguments without themselves understanding why our civilization had ‘sped faster than the rest’. Worse, they bought into the lie just as libertarians bought into the lie of an aristocracy (sovereignty) of everyone. THE NEW RIGHT = SCIENTIFIC RIGHT. The alt right uses ridicule, but by and large the new right differs from the old right in that we now have DATA and we have it from a century of failures with the falsehoods of classical liberalism, and the falsehoods of marxist-postmodernism. My work is just going back to our roots: impose the law with violence and incrementally suppress all transgressions of it. Men will naturally insure kin, so create nation states, or at least small local polities in the Swiss model with federal governments providing only reciprocal decidability over inter-state conflicts, and acting as insurer of last resort.