Aristocracy must rule out of self defense, and out of defense for the future of mankind. The domestication of animal man and the organized intergenerational development of agency must continue. At current rates, all of western evolutionary progress will be lost in 80 years.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:37:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018142386269155328
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Aristocracy must rule out of self defense, and out of defense for the future of mankind. The domestication of animal man and the organized intergenerational development of agency must continue. At current rates, all of western evolutionary progress will be lost in 80 years.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:36:59 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
Retweeted Rolf Degen (@DegenRolf):
Individuals with a kind personality are less likely to be successful in politics.
https://t.co/2gtFMiK1Sq https://t.co/POhk4SyNQj
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:04:58 UTC
RT @DegenRolf: Individuals with a kind personality are less likely to be successful in politics.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41269-018-0095-z https://t.co/POhk4…
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:04:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018134262363705344
One of the more insidious goals has been to arm more of the state operators and to consume the munitions supply. Guns are of no value without ammunition.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 13:44:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018129001997533185
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
One of the more insidious goals has been to arm more of the state operators and to consume the munitions supply. Guns are of no value without ammunition.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 13:43:54 UTC
1 -Courts 2-Military 3-Banks 4-State
One down.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 12:54:00 UTC
YES WE ARE WINNING
The tipping point was probably the Supreme court. But we are winning. Now we need to keep on the pressure, keep re-normalizing nationalist speech, and see if the left doubles down on violence which gives us an excuse. They will do something. For certain. But without the court they are effectively powerless.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 12:36:00 UTC
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300060https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300060THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM NEUTRALIZES IQ DIFFERENCES
• In both the U.S. and Denmark intelligence failed to predict standard party choice.
• This was due to opposing effects of intelligence on economic and social ideology.
•Denmark’s multi-party system allows non-standard representations of party choice.
•In Denmark, significant systematic intelligence differences observed between parties.
Intelligence is rarely studied as a predictor of vote choice, and at first glance our data supports this neglect: In samples from the U.S. and Denmark (Ns = 1419 and 953), intelligence does not predict the standard operationalization of vote choice in which parties are placed on a single left-vs-right dimension. (Standardized coefficients predicting right-wing vote choice were 0.05 and −0.03, respectively.)
However, this apparent non-effect in fact reflects approximately equal and opposite effects of intelligence on vote choice as transmitted through social and economic ideology. In both countries, higher ability predicts left-wing social and right-wing economic views.
The impact of intelligence on vote choice is thus most visible in true multi-party systems like Denmark, in which parties do not simply pair similar levels of social and economic conservatism, but instead provide diverse combinations of social and economic ideology.
Comparing the parties closest to representing authoritarian egalitarianism (social-right plus economic-left) and libertarianism (social-left plus economic-right), we observed a 0.9 SD intelligence gap.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 10:54:00 UTC
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300060THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM NEUTRALIZES IQ DIFFERENCES
• In both the U.S. and Denmark intelligence failed to predict standard party choice.
• This was due to opposing effects of intelligence on economic and social ideology.
•Denmark’s multi-party system allows non-standard representations of party choice.
•In Denmark, significant systematic intelligence differences observed between parties.
Intelligence is rarely studied as a predictor of vote choice, and at first glance our data supports this neglect: In samples from the U.S. and Denmark (Ns = 1419 and 953), intelligence does not predict the standard operationalization of vote choice in which parties are placed on a single left-vs-right dimension. (Standardized coefficients predicting right-wing vote choice were 0.05 and −0.03, respectively.)
However, this apparent non-effect in fact reflects approximately equal and opposite effects of intelligence on vote choice as transmitted through social and economic ideology. In both countries, higher ability predicts left-wing social and right-wing economic views.
The impact of intelligence on vote choice is thus most visible in true multi-party systems like Denmark, in which parties do not simply pair similar levels of social and economic conservatism, but instead provide diverse combinations of social and economic ideology.
Comparing the parties closest to representing authoritarian egalitarianism (social-right plus economic-left) and libertarianism (social-left plus economic-right), we observed a 0.9 SD intelligence gap.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300060
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 10:54:00 UTC