(FB 1543511975 Timestamp) ATTACKING THE 20th CENTURY: NATIONAL SOCIALISM WON. In other words China implemented National Socialism. Reeducation camps and all. —“Is it the word National as in Nationalist or is it Socialism as in Socialist ? I’m trying to understand if this is an attack on President Trump for saying he is a nationalist or an attack on the Socialist democrats ?”—@jonn_schulz It’s an attack on our understanding of the 20th century. China has implemented the National Socialist (NSDAP/NAZI) social, economic, and political model: one man rule, nationalism, state capitalism, spending, remilitarization, censorship, digital conformity, reeducation camps.
Theme: Governance
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543531421 Timestamp) THE CHOICES OF SOCIAL ORDER GOVERNANCE …………..Force —– Religion —— Trade (anglo) Control Violence and the Law (Law) Force……..X……………………………………….. Force……..X……………….X……………………. Force……..X…………………………………..X… Force……..X……………….X………………..X… Control Education, Inclusion, Exclusion (Norms) Religion………………………X……………………. Religion…..X………………..X……………………. Religion………………………X……………….X…. Religion…..X………………..X……………….X…. Control Money and Credit ( Consumption ) Trade……..X……………………………………….. Trade……..X………………..X……………………. Trade……..X…………………………………..X…. Trade……..X………………..X……………….X…. We evolved Force (aristocracy) > Administrative | Administrative (Religion) > Trade (commercial) because it was necessary. We should note that the middle east did NOT follow the same route, and developed Religion > Force(kings) > Priest-Kings > Centralized government and production > Then Trade. Never rule of law. This is why the fertile crescent was both a benefit and a curse. Just as resource curses are always a double edged sword. Means of Decision on the Organization of Production and Choice of Commons: ………………Monarchy .. Oligarchy .. Rule of Law . Democracy Auth……..: ……X Rentiers…: ……………………..X Markets…:………………………………………..X Socialism.:…………………………………………………………….X See?
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543529647 Timestamp) HOW DID THEY DO IT AND WHY CAN’T WE? Having divorced themselves from the burden of carrying territory, the classes necessary to defend it, police it, govern it, and the classes necessary to engage in production to pay for it, they were free to specialize in predation upon the host – primarily through various forms of usury, rent seeking, and conspiracy with the state against the people, and just as we redistributed lower class reproduction to the upper classes, they invested ALL of their reproduction in the parasitic classes. That’s the net of it right there. We can’t do that because we need to hold territory, fight for it, and pay for fighting for it, while continuously improving our condition. Ergo we produce commons and they parasitically consume and destroy commons. I mean. That’s the economics of it right there.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543592915 Timestamp) THE COMMONS OF NOMOCRACY by Bill Joslin Nomocracy (Rule of Law) is a Commons. The forms of rule, outlined by Aristotle, describe the cycle of competition to gain a monopoly over the commons (to seize control of it). Nomocracy exists as a commons. [Nomocracy, under everyman a Sheriff (contract and criminal law separated from legislative and regulatory institutions), exists as a commons, where all contribute via participation in lawful behaviour, as well as execution of the law and all who do so reap the benefits – a type of property.)] An end to the many *-ocracies (forms of rule which monopolize law) could end civilizational cycles.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543592915 Timestamp) THE COMMONS OF NOMOCRACY by Bill Joslin Nomocracy (Rule of Law) is a Commons. The forms of rule, outlined by Aristotle, describe the cycle of competition to gain a monopoly over the commons (to seize control of it). Nomocracy exists as a commons. [Nomocracy, under everyman a Sheriff (contract and criminal law separated from legislative and regulatory institutions), exists as a commons, where all contribute via participation in lawful behaviour, as well as execution of the law and all who do so reap the benefits – a type of property.)] An end to the many *-ocracies (forms of rule which monopolize law) could end civilizational cycles.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
(FB 1543761176 Timestamp) THERE ARE ONLY THREE MEANS OF COERCION All groups govern one another and compete with others, using a combination of those three means of coercion. And with those means of coercion they put them to good or ill use. For example, force can be used for predation or law, remuneration for bribery or trade, speech et all for moral or immoral purposes.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
(FB 1543761176 Timestamp) THERE ARE ONLY THREE MEANS OF COERCION All groups govern one another and compete with others, using a combination of those three means of coercion. And with those means of coercion they put them to good or ill use. For example, force can be used for predation or law, remuneration for bribery or trade, speech et all for moral or immoral purposes.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543794442 Timestamp) —“Political Violence Is a Game the Right Canât Win”— followed by justifications… Theory is not empirical. study mao, isis, arab spring, ukraine, the rapid acquiescence once the civil rights movement went violent. note the acceleration of time frames. The usa is fragile. the left would use mass violence, the right mass attack on infrastructure.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543794442 Timestamp) —“Political Violence Is a Game the Right Canât Win”— followed by justifications… Theory is not empirical. study mao, isis, arab spring, ukraine, the rapid acquiescence once the civil rights movement went violent. note the acceleration of time frames. The usa is fragile. the left would use mass violence, the right mass attack on infrastructure.
-
(FB 1544136212 Timestamp) DOOLITTLE JOINS LAUREN ON MOLY ON WEINSTEIN @BretWeins
(FB 1544136212 Timestamp) DOOLITTLE JOINS LAUREN ON MOLY ON WEINSTEIN @BretWeinstein You stepped in it. Anyone who studies any of history will discover that the group strategy and tactic of some civilizations cause invention, some cause stagnation, and some cause devolution. 2) Just because you are getting support and attention, do not assume you have license to overreach and hubris. Civilizational differences are in our Laws: Western Empiricism, Easter Wisdom, Indian Mythology, Semitic Fraud (Pilpul/Critique), African Magic, Australian Devolution. 3) That We dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of supernaturalism in the ancient world, and ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, suffering, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature is purely empirical. 4) …. The indo european expansion, the ancient world reason, the modern world empiricism, science, and technology. 5) Where would the world be had Europe, like China, built a wall at the Bosphorus, Caucuses and Urals? Where would the world be without the Semitic Dark Age and its thousand years of decline, and 1B dead, and the destruction of the great civilizations of the ancient world? Where would the world be without Supernaturalism, Sophism, and Pseudoscience: The Semitic Dark Age of Judaism, Christianity, Islamism, and the attempt to do the same in the modern world of Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism’s to repeat Ancient destruction in Modernity? 6) So it is not that some Gene Pools, some Civilizations, are just variations on a theme like the Cervidae. Some Rapidly Evolve, some Slowly Evolve, some Stagnate, and some bring about decline through the destruction of civilization in every one of its dimensions. Just like the Classes, some Civilizations are innovators, some producers, some some consumers, some free riders, some parasites, and some predators. And I have, we have, had enough of the sophism of relativism and the pseudoscience of equalitarianism, and the pseudosciences of man: Boas et all, Marx et al, Freud et al, Cantor and the Logicians, Mises and the libertarians, Adorno et al, Keynes, Derrida et al, neocons et al. So before you cast the stone of Critique, reciprocity would demand you do not live in the Glass House of sophism and pseudoscience.