(FB 1543253029 Timestamp) —“The bigger, systemic problem isn’t separating a church from state, but keeping the state from becoming the “church” … The State has, in the vacuum that the absence of a godded religion has generated, deified its social and environmental markets. The State wants religion.”—Anne Summers
Theme: Governance
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543194539 Timestamp) SORRY GUYS, DOIN’ MY JOB —“…Stop talking about fucking religion all the time and get back to strategizing against the neoliberal world order and promoting anti-poz behavior.”—Dylan Newman Sorry man. I’m working on the constitution and it’s statements on religion so I had to test some ideas. I should be done and will move on again shortly. I got stuck on the debt-creation concept a few weeks ago and only felt I got my arms around it in the past week. Working through that problem meant trying a lot of arguments from a lot of angles. And this forum is where I run experiments, and people try to refute them, and I learn from that ‘market’ activity. Doing my job. It’s part of the job. That said, I am profoundly proud of working through the problem of religion. It is the hard problem of social science. And worse, like Truth Telling, it is EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE to produce a good religion and extremely cheap to produce a bad one. Law and Markets are trivial achievements by comparison. Cheers.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1543196225 Timestamp) TURNING SEX WORKERS INTO THE IRS? You know I first heard about this yesterday when someone sent me a photo of one of the report forms. I”m not quite sure how I feel about it. I mean, abstractly, its funny as hell as a creative prank. Whether the IRS would act on it, is something else. Given that I think the IRS is the most criminal of institutions I have a problem with licensing them against anyone. Depriving low income bimbos of hard currency is not something I feel good about. Whether the consequence would mean de-funding those sites that stream crime, gore, accident, and fail videos is all I really care about. I’m perfectly happy if the sexually desperate pay cam girls in order to provide me with free streaming of crime around the world. https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/rightwing-trolls-report-online-sex-workers-to-tax-authorities-in-thotaudit/news-story/16cff3e5f5f4303b78d1dc23c80af4db?
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543192600 Timestamp) ON UKRAINE AND MARTIAL LAW (From a journalist friend in ukraine. Edited for anonymity and clarity.) —“Hi, … I can’t get a feeling for the reasons behind the martial law request from the Rada. I can see both good and bad reasons to ask. Can you help me?”— Hello Curt ! I think, this decision was logical. The goal of the Russian Federation is to continue the war; to inflict economic losses on Ukraine; to destabilize the state in such a way as to avoid a further wave of sanctions. Without Ukraine’s response, the enemy will feel they can act with impunity – besides, it is a demonstration of Russian aggression in the face of the whole world. This policy will facilitate the provision of earlier sanctions inside the country, and such a situation can play a political role for the authorities in Ukraine. –“And, by any chance, are the oligarchs a target of this policy?”– It’s possible since they monopolize the television. But we must wait and see. It is an interesting time to be a journalist. —“Thanks!”—
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543531421 Timestamp) THE CHOICES OF SOCIAL ORDER GOVERNANCE …………..Force —– Religion —— Trade (anglo) Control Violence and the Law (Law) Force……..X……………………………………….. Force……..X……………….X……………………. Force……..X…………………………………..X… Force……..X……………….X………………..X… Control Education, Inclusion, Exclusion (Norms) Religion………………………X……………………. Religion…..X………………..X……………………. Religion………………………X……………….X…. Religion…..X………………..X……………….X…. Control Money and Credit ( Consumption ) Trade……..X……………………………………….. Trade……..X………………..X……………………. Trade……..X…………………………………..X…. Trade……..X………………..X……………….X…. We evolved Force (aristocracy) > Administrative | Administrative (Religion) > Trade (commercial) because it was necessary. We should note that the middle east did NOT follow the same route, and developed Religion > Force(kings) > Priest-Kings > Centralized government and production > Then Trade. Never rule of law. This is why the fertile crescent was both a benefit and a curse. Just as resource curses are always a double edged sword. Means of Decision on the Organization of Production and Choice of Commons: ………………Monarchy .. Oligarchy .. Rule of Law . Democracy Auth……..: ……X Rentiers…: ……………………..X Markets…:………………………………………..X Socialism.:…………………………………………………………….X See?
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543529647 Timestamp) HOW DID THEY DO IT AND WHY CAN’T WE? Having divorced themselves from the burden of carrying territory, the classes necessary to defend it, police it, govern it, and the classes necessary to engage in production to pay for it, they were free to specialize in predation upon the host – primarily through various forms of usury, rent seeking, and conspiracy with the state against the people, and just as we redistributed lower class reproduction to the upper classes, they invested ALL of their reproduction in the parasitic classes. That’s the net of it right there. We can’t do that because we need to hold territory, fight for it, and pay for fighting for it, while continuously improving our condition. Ergo we produce commons and they parasitically consume and destroy commons. I mean. That’s the economics of it right there.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543521336 Timestamp) THE FRAGILITY OF CURRENT STOIC RESTORATION MOVEMENT —“Curt, it looks like the Daily Stoic has taken a Left Turn. Can you take a look?”— One of my followers has complained about what she perceived as a ‘turn to the left’ by the Daily Stoic. She asked if I would investigate, since I am advocating the restoration of stoicism as required education – a restoration of our ancient personal religion so to speak. My followers are unlikely to need training in stoicism in large part because they already practice the habits under indirect guise. Their interest and mine is political, economic, and evolutionary. The cognitive discipline (habits) Stoicism provides, produces superior polities. Those polities are superior because they are less dependent upon falsehoods to govern. So the direction of the Stoic Restoration has more than trivial importance to me, and to them. But what troubles me when I survey your (collective) approach, which is the imbalance between defensive self help and detachment – the trap fallen into by the Buddhists – and disciplined self-authoring in the excellences (‘virtues’), and in achieving one’s life’s goals (change). In other words, without the COMPETITION between rational distance from your emotions, and pursuit of achievements in life, all one does is recreate abrahamic and buddhist detachment from reality. This produces no excellences, only defenses – submission to circumstance. Western civilization was unique in that we developed Heroism, Individual Sovereignty, Truth and Duty, The Natural Law (of tort), and Markets in all aspects of personal, academic, intellectual, commercial, civic, and political life – avoiding theocratic or bureaucratic monopoly. It was this set of traits that allowed us to develop all the paradigms (disciplines) all of which were united only by those few criteria above. This meant that law > jury > reason > empiricism > science > technology > medicine could evolve … … and with them we could – in the ancient and modern if not medieval worlds – drag mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the victimization by uncaring nature. The means by which we achieved all of this was competition (markets). And the means by which the stoic virtues can be achieved without causing the same catastrophe that reverses the western achievement, is by both increased independence from our animal intuitions, and … … application of that mind, emotions, and body, freed of those limits, to achieve the heroic at whatever scale of heroism the individual is able – no matter how large or small. To make the most of the one life we have available to us, in a manner must desirable to us. Leaving this competition between unsaid, is to leave stoicism incomplete. And to fall into the errors we have seen in prior eras, which slowly cause a people to descend into what is emotionally comforting but in demonstration of consequence indifferent from nihilism. In Sincerity and With Affection Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute. ( From twitter stream: https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1068232096496390144)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543531421 Timestamp) THE CHOICES OF SOCIAL ORDER GOVERNANCE …………..Force —– Religion —— Trade (anglo) Control Violence and the Law (Law) Force……..X……………………………………….. Force……..X……………….X……………………. Force……..X…………………………………..X… Force……..X……………….X………………..X… Control Education, Inclusion, Exclusion (Norms) Religion………………………X……………………. Religion…..X………………..X……………………. Religion………………………X……………….X…. Religion…..X………………..X……………….X…. Control Money and Credit ( Consumption ) Trade……..X……………………………………….. Trade……..X………………..X……………………. Trade……..X…………………………………..X…. Trade……..X………………..X……………….X…. We evolved Force (aristocracy) > Administrative | Administrative (Religion) > Trade (commercial) because it was necessary. We should note that the middle east did NOT follow the same route, and developed Religion > Force(kings) > Priest-Kings > Centralized government and production > Then Trade. Never rule of law. This is why the fertile crescent was both a benefit and a curse. Just as resource curses are always a double edged sword. Means of Decision on the Organization of Production and Choice of Commons: ………………Monarchy .. Oligarchy .. Rule of Law . Democracy Auth……..: ……X Rentiers…: ……………………..X Markets…:………………………………………..X Socialism.:…………………………………………………………….X See?
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543515002 Timestamp) —“Chinese government is national socialism: fascism disguised as âcommunismâ”—Georg Ios
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543529647 Timestamp) HOW DID THEY DO IT AND WHY CAN’T WE? Having divorced themselves from the burden of carrying territory, the classes necessary to defend it, police it, govern it, and the classes necessary to engage in production to pay for it, they were free to specialize in predation upon the host – primarily through various forms of usury, rent seeking, and conspiracy with the state against the people, and just as we redistributed lower class reproduction to the upper classes, they invested ALL of their reproduction in the parasitic classes. That’s the net of it right there. We can’t do that because we need to hold territory, fight for it, and pay for fighting for it, while continuously improving our condition. Ergo we produce commons and they parasitically consume and destroy commons. I mean. That’s the economics of it right there.