Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • NO YOU DON”T UNDERSTAND UKRAINE. (REALLY) I don’t think any American who hasn’t

    NO YOU DON”T UNDERSTAND UKRAINE. (REALLY)

    I don’t think any American who hasn’t lived in Kiev and talked with these people has the vaguest ideal how good the legislature and law is, but who owns the various judiciaries, and how corrupt the bureaucracy is, and it’s not because these are bad people, but because everyone is so poor, that it’s the only way to make a decent living: charging for government services.

    The Kremlin is far more byzantine than the Rada (parliament) and like the chinese communist party, far more a group of powerful families. Ukrainian power is outside of the government in the 40+ oligarchs (Gangsters), and they have more money than the state (and more men and guns).

    Putin could put down the Oligarchs in Russia with the Chechens, and the FSB, and so could the chinese with the red army but the conspiracy between moscow and kiev to undermine ukrainian military and bureaucracy so that they could restore the union of the two countries was so far along that once the revolution started, there is no possible way to put down the oligarchs, fight a war with russia in the east, and survive as a country without descending into internecine warfare.

    States need wealth for this reason. And every libertarian is completely unaware he’s advocating for the condition in Ukraine now and in the Pale in the past. Where do they think Rothbard, Rand and Mises got their ideas from?

    Useful idiots whether left, right, or libertarian.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 17:50:00 UTC

  • THE NATIONAL SOCIALISM QUESTION. IT WON THE 20TH RIGHT? I know history is curren

    THE NATIONAL SOCIALISM QUESTION. IT WON THE 20TH RIGHT?

    I know history is currently overturning the mythology but I want to address the National Socialist community for a moment, even if it’s politically incorrect for now.

    My problem with supporting the NS political program is limited to the strange german obsession with recreating a secular religion to replace the devotion of the catholic church. It’s in everything they do. It’s also why they’re the most moral people on earth most of the time.

    So this remains one of my most frustrating problems: the germans have pretty much always ‘been right’, throughout all of history. And I know why (customary law). Am I right that we must create this formal law, but that we must also produce a secular political religion on top?

    NS won the 20th right? I mean, that’s what China is practicing, and that’s what Russia wants to practice – if we’d let them. Democracy failed as always. Representative democracy failed as always. and the only decent countries are those with intact monarchies, or politicians …

    … who in practice act as monarchs rather than CEO’s. Now. I prefer a monarchy, under our traditional rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, with the purpose of the government the intergenerational persistence of family and nation. Where the monarchy appoints a cabinet …

    … but in english fashion, a jury of the people (or multiple houses acting as juries) approve or veto requests from the cabinet, which are all to be structured as contracts of the commons. This depoliticizes society, which has been a catastrophe for western civlization.

    There is precious little evidence that political competition does anything except undermine the nation. And by limiting people to voluntary means of cooperating, we deprive them of pursuit of rents.

    But given our historical mistake of not making the state treasury the bank of the realm, and separating credit to the people, with credit in business and industry, we allowed creation of rents against the people that belong to them in the first place, not to the finance sector.

    This problem is easily rectified.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 17:21:00 UTC

  • There is precious little evidence that political competition does anything excep

    There is precious little evidence that political competition does anything except undermine the nation. And by limiting people to voluntary means of cooperating, we deprive them of pursuit of rents.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 17:01:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179078908299403265

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179078907204648966

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    … but in english fashion, a jury of the people (or multiple houses acting as juries) approve or veto requests from the cabinet, which are all to be structured as contracts of the commons. This depoliticizes society, which has been a catastrophe for western civlization.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179078907204648966

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    … but in english fashion, a jury of the people (or multiple houses acting as juries) approve or veto requests from the cabinet, which are all to be structured as contracts of the commons. This depoliticizes society, which has been a catastrophe for western civlization.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179078907204648966

  • NS won the 20th right? I mean, that’s what China is practicing, and that’s what

    NS won the 20th right? I mean, that’s what China is practicing, and that’s what Russia wants to practice – if we’d let them. Democracy failed as always. Representative democracy failed as always. and the only decent counries are those with intact monarchies, or politicians …

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 17:01:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179078904990048257

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179078903845081089

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    So this remains one of my most frustrating problems: the germans have pretty much always ‘been right’, throughout all of history. And I know why (customary law). Am I right that we must create this formal law, but that we must also produce a secular political religion on top?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179078903845081089

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    So this remains one of my most frustrating problems: the germans have pretty much always ‘been right’, throughout all of history. And I know why (customary law). Am I right that we must create this formal law, but that we must also produce a secular political religion on top?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179078903845081089

  • My problem with supporting the NS political program is limited to the strange ge

    My problem with supporting the NS political program is limited to the strange german obsession with recreating a secular religion to replace the devotion of the catholic church. It’s in everything they do. It’s also why they’re the most moral people on earth most of the time.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 17:01:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179078902746091521

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179078901676556288

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    I know history is currently overturning the mythology but I want to address the National Socialist community for a moment, even if it’s politically incorrect for now.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179078901676556288

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    I know history is currently overturning the mythology but I want to address the National Socialist community for a moment, even if it’s politically incorrect for now.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179078901676556288

  • Most of my work is operationalizing law and government so that there are no cond

    Most of my work is operationalizing law and government so that there are no conditions that lack accountability – meaning warranty and liability.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 16:36:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179072693536210945

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179072328896000001

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @fryskefilosoof Well we are all liable for the contracts we make on behalf of others, so it’s not so much deposing the government as requiring signatories tot he contract warranty it (and remain liable for it) for the duration of its cause and consequence.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179072328896000001

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @fryskefilosoof Well we are all liable for the contracts we make on behalf of others, so it’s not so much deposing the government as requiring signatories tot he contract warranty it (and remain liable for it) for the duration of its cause and consequence.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179072328896000001

  • Well we are all liable for the contracts we make on behalf of others, so it’s no

    Well we are all liable for the contracts we make on behalf of others, so it’s not so much deposing the government as requiring signatories tot he contract warranty it (and remain liable for it) for the duration of its cause and consequence.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 16:35:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179072328896000001

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179071966025793541

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179071966025793541

  • We design our governments for cooperation, but we experience both wars and windf

    We design our governments for cooperation, but we experience both wars and windfalls that require – because of human nature – monopolization of resources during war, and distribution of gains during windfalls.The problem is the accumulation of rents. That’s the problem. Solve it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 16:34:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179072031154941956

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179071160526487555

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @fryskefilosoof There is only one law, and one constructs rule of law under that law or one does not. As such all legislation (contracts of the commons) and regulation (rules of implementation) are simply contracts yes. However, there consist three states of a polity: War, Cooperation, Windfall.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179071160526487555

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @fryskefilosoof There is only one law, and one constructs rule of law under that law or one does not. As such all legislation (contracts of the commons) and regulation (rules of implementation) are simply contracts yes. However, there consist three states of a polity: War, Cooperation, Windfall.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179071160526487555

  • Moral is an irrelevant term. States are necessary logically, empirically, and op

    Moral is an irrelevant term. States are necessary logically, empirically, and operationally. Only human actions are moral or not. Violence likewise is amoral. It is a resource. It is whether we put it to moral (reciprocal) or immoral (irrreciprocal) ends.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 14:50:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179046051304660992

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179045674546937856

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179045674546937856

  • RT @curtdoolittle: A MORAL LICENSE FOR CIVIL WAR @TRUMP @realDonaldTrump @POTUS

    RT @curtdoolittle: A MORAL LICENSE FOR CIVIL WAR
    @TRUMP @realDonaldTrump @POTUS https://t.co/uzRQ4HgSWU

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 14:46:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179044887049773056