That’s just one criteria. The other is whether they’re an advanced or primitive civ. And whether the externalities would be harmful to us. So the other two criteria provide practical vs ideal decidability.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-13 17:16:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392891583872348160
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392885339761659909
don’t be an idiot. all economists know that pollution reduction lags development.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-02 03:58:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388704498491793408
Reply addressees: @FreeCalNow @ianbremmer @PeterZeihan @gzeromedia
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388703903559077894
comparing china to the usa is misleading. comparing china to europe plus the USA is not. the correct interpretation is that china is as polluting as the west despite its poverty.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-02 03:06:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388691269224914946
Reply addressees: @ianbremmer @PeterZeihan @gzeromedia
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388682157963497480
Hayek’s insight was in his first book (the sensory order). He failed to apply the central problem in Road to Serfdom to econ the importance of the balance sheet that includes social capital, but he did discover the solution via-negativa: law – b/c of his association with Popper https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384174266808107009
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-19 16:00:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384175129689657356
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384174266808107009
Even Misesian econ is an attempt to extend Jewish parasitism upon hosts by baiting into hazard, and avoidance of contribution to capitalizing the commons, by failing to account for them. Hayek’s Road to Serfdom and Knowledge in Econ are statements the capital value of commons. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1375524923796504580
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-26 19:11:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1375525756642672648
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1375524923796504580
i) instead, segregation causes internalization of costs – forcing ingroups to pay the cost of their own domestication, organization, production, and reproduction. j) desegregation, and forced school integration have been the greatest failures in political history.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-08 18:03:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1368985705532297216
Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1368985366427037696
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@BretWeinstein e) parasites justify parasitism f) organizers of parasitism benefit from developing clientele (leftism) g) and those who resist parasites organize in response (rightism). h) parasitism is an objective ascertainment of the imposition of costs upon the private and common.
Period.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1368985366427037696
… Graceful Failure -> Mythology (+Externalities)
-> Demographic Distribution > Demand for Action -><
… Graceful Success -> Science (-Externalities)
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-27 17:17:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365712561275035651
Reply addressees: @Anthroposcenics @MindTrained @BernardoKastrup
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1365711664369311749
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Anthroposcenics @MindTrained @BernardoKastrup Never happen 😉
Deceit
… … sophistry(Philosophy) > pseudoscience(magic) >
… … (Fictionalism) > occult(Theology) >
… Intuition ->/
-> Paradigm[Metaphysics] ->
… Reason ->\
… … (Fiction) > Mythology > Literature >
… … … History > Science > Testimony >
Truth
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1365711664369311749
6) Libertarian idiocy is almost always a childlike ideology that ignores externalities, except it is externalities and their cumulative effects, that we engineer civilization from, by the incremental domestication of male and female superpredators we call humans.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-17 02:06:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1361859429235372036
Reply addressees: @cameron_kasky
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1361743461003706371
There is no reciprocity in lying, I can only enage in reciprocity if it is productive, truthful, voluntary, warrantable, and free of impositionof costs by externality.
You are engaging in a crime by lying, AND by falsely representing conspiracy to engage in crime is reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-07 22:12:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358539084814299140
Reply addressees: @FL1420
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358538366757830664
Reciprocity requires productive (non parasitic), exhaustively informed (testimony), voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others. By perpetuating abrahamic deciet you impose a cost on the informational commons.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-07 16:18:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358450016533303301
Reply addressees: @FL1420
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358446499974307840