Yep. You choose, and you gain/lose you profit/pay. You don’t get to export those choices.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 17:45:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422614672709140486
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422613600468934656
This problem is easily solved:
1 – prohibit single-use plastics
2 – require glass
3 – pay the increase in production and transportation costs
We aren’t in the 20th now. Driving up costs drives up the competitiveness of our products and deprives others of the ability to compete.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-03 15:56:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422587082619428871
…framing, and obscuring, fraud by baiting into a hazard, free riding, privatization of commons, socialization of losses, blackmail, and conspiracy? Isn’t that the origin and purpose of Rothbardian ethics in the “Diasporic Ethics of the Pale?” … https://t.co/ZdddW1H1u5
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414309469667335
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414306772684805
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
8. Isn’t evasion by use of non-aggression principles despite human retaliation against ALL imposition of costs upon all demonstrated interests whether private, semi-private, or common, an attempt to permit the continuation of fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by loading, …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414306772684805
Stephan: Non aggression against WHAT?
Intersubjectively verifiable property. “physical things”. Right?
Does that allow for Deceit? Fraud? Blackmail? Devaluation by Externality? Baiting into Hazard? Sedition or Treason against a ‘libertarian’ (jewish separatist) polity?
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-25 15:12:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1408442914456358919
I made a list of all the examples of moral constraint and then all the examples of ethical constraint, and in vernacular, immoral is general and abstract, and ethical is specific, so to disambiguate them I chose the direct vs indirect. all ethics(specific) under moral(General)
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-23 23:41:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1407846346959228929
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @Claffertyshane
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1407837295143800835
ethics = direct interpersonal, morals = indirect, externality.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-23 21:51:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1407818555421298693
Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1407816986839691267
–“Tolerance is not an investment in a future you want, it is an externalization of the costs of a present you don’t want. “– Luke Weinhagen
Tolerance is a dirty word – a sin, a fraud, a crime. 😉
Intolerance is a virtue – bearing a cost of domestication of man. https://twitter.com/LukeWeinhagen/status/1407008080592871425
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-21 16:46:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1407017013315354624
https://twitter.com/LukeWeinhagen/status/1407008080592871425
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @ContraFabianist @curtdoolittle Correct. Nicely stated.
Systems that externalize costs MUST become self-serving (or co…
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-10 19:32:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1403072479162208258
nope. everything has an externality, but they are good or bad, Abrahamism is the cancer the devil gave mankind.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-07 16:42:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1401942736471797768
Reply addressees: @Thanos3rd
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1401941240631922689
This is true. It also produces negative externalities. But maybe it’s just natural selection at work. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-07 16:33:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1401940388504555529
Reply addressees: @Thanos3rd
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1401939921330397191