RT @PeterZeihan: And another. This time from the importers’ points of view. https://t.co/Rw73AhPQ59

Source date (UTC): 2022-04-12 18:23:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1513945939043565568
RT @PeterZeihan: And another. This time from the importers’ points of view. https://t.co/Rw73AhPQ59

Source date (UTC): 2022-04-12 18:23:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1513945939043565568
Christianity solves the problem of self-regulation successfully with both positive(trust) and negative(sophistry) externalities. Secular humanism does so with a less superstitious but pseudoscientific equivalent. Our natural religion does the best job(see japan, china) w/o lying.
Source date (UTC): 2022-04-06 15:42:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1511730993518059524
Reply addressees: @Voidward
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1511730358815010817
6. Conversely, the american experiment failed because we didn’t limit privatization of commons – because unlike china, we hadn’t had the advantage of the US’s invention of financialism, so we relied on private capital where china doesn’t have to.
Source date (UTC): 2022-04-02 15:00:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1510270837336809476
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1510266698665971719
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
5. China’s pursuit of world strategic power before completing the transformation to rule of law, high trust, and MORAL mixed economy, consisted of trying to make nine women make a baby in one month. It’s not possible. And it aggrevates everyone.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1510266698665971719
OCCUPYING MY THOUGHTS TODAY:
Much of what we consider immoral about present law (and less so continental law) is that the current common law has removed state responsibility for externalities from the state, which then abuses people by failure of accounting for it. Fixable. Easy.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-29 21:04:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1508913083187699719
Rationally true. Empirically false. Legally false. One of the ‘holes’ in the common law is the failure to explicitly account for externalities, as our ability to produce externalities has scaled. You have a cognitive bias (a female bias) that depends on false equality.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-29 19:04:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1508882898463571975
Reply addressees: @Steve_OMFG @petersavodnik @bariweiss @DavidSacks
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1508857541282910216
It’s a term from economics that’s related to ‘resource curse’. It means making money (and corruption) from extracting natural resources but not developing a diverse and complex economy. Oil rich countries tend to be poor. Compare how oil rich Norway differs vs Russia, Venezuela.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-13 23:19:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1503148720426205190
Reply addressees: @NNpcson @HuginJones
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1503147923659440128
RT @LukeWeinhagen: It’s not your interests that are immoral, it’s your costs.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-09 21:49:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1501676644939014146
(BB: Can you explain? Regulatory? Russia Externality? Tech problems?
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-06 19:36:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1500556017670762498
Reply addressees: @bryanbrey
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1500435813930356736
You are mistaken. Externalities are sufficient.
Source date (UTC): 2022-03-04 03:29:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1499587869870108672
Reply addressees: @newsandstuffbro
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1499570241722105863
RT @curtdoolittle: @medoswift @hazbeenthere @elbanna101 @mklixi The hard part for us to learn is that our charity causes harms, but our soc…
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-05 19:25:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490044017211592712