Theme: Ethnoculture

  • Ukrainian women Ukrainian food. Ukrainian culture. The trifecta of perfection. T

    Ukrainian women

    Ukrainian food.

    Ukrainian culture.

    The trifecta of perfection.

    Three things you just cant compete with. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-16 10:39:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://blog.23andme.com/23andme-research/genes-and-geography/


    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-11 06:57:00 UTC

  • “You think IQ research is dangerous to the status quo? Wait until researchers be

    —“You think IQ research is dangerous to the status quo? Wait until researchers begin uncovering population group differences in the moral senses.”—

    Yeah. Um. That will be awkward.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-10 00:42:00 UTC

  • THAT WE’VE FULLY DISMANTLED THE PROGRESSIVE FANTASY, MAYBE WE CAN CREATE POLICY

    http://www.amazon.com/Troublesome-Inheritance-Genes-Human-History/dp/1594204462NOW THAT WE’VE FULLY DISMANTLED THE PROGRESSIVE FANTASY, MAYBE WE CAN CREATE POLICY RELEVANT TO REAL HUMAN NEEDS.

    When, I dunno how many years ago it was, but the Economist and Science came out with the uncomfortable truth that the human genome project was producing quite different results than had been promised. We started speciating rapidly upon exiting Africa, and we evolve much more quickly than we though. And we’re different. Meaningfully different. And while the law must treat us equally in matters of dispute, to be just in any sense of the word, policy in any collective must be of necessity tailored to the ‘tribe’ that it is intended to support. Why do we put all our children through school at the same ages despite their different rates of maturity (control of impulse)? Why do we treat humans as industrial products? They’re not.

    My position is that I would rather deal with the aristocracy of each tribe on behalf of his tribe, than some assumed proxy that portents to possess the wisdom necessary to discover what is best for ALL tribes. I mean, you can’t really know that, and we’ve proven we can’t know that now. What we can do is facilitate cooperatoin between tribes.

    I view it as my moral obligation to help members of other tribes. But I view the state as our common enemy – an interference between aristocratic classes. An obstacle to our mutual cooperation. The state was invented to finance war. Any tribe with a nuclear weapon can defend its territory. And any tribe with a trained militia can defend its people. I prefer to live in a world where we cooperate, because non-cooperation is suicidal, than one in which we are in competition with a conflict-generating state.

    A world of families, tribes and nations is a beautiful thing. a world of predatory parasitic states is not.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-08 14:41:00 UTC

  • WE ARE BOTH FIGHTING FOR TRIBALISM The islamists are fighting for tribalism. If

    WE ARE BOTH FIGHTING FOR TRIBALISM

    The islamists are fighting for tribalism. If their tribalism wasn’t wrapped in islamic anti-science and anti rationalism, I’d support it. But should we look at it another way? Did their states just fail faster because they were poorer? They want to preserve their low trust tribalism. we want to preserve our high trust tribalism. But both from the islamist and the aristocratic sides, we are trying to restore tribalism against the anti-tribal corporate state.

    —“[CREVELD] His first conclusion was that the nation-state, as we know it, is in decline. The second was that warfare is undergoing a transformation to a new form that will be impossible for nation-states to defeat.”—

    Robb, John (2008-04-01). Brave New War: The Next Stage of Terrorism and the End of Globalization (p. 28). Turner Publishing Company. Kindle Edition.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-06 07:08:00 UTC

  • WEAKNESS OF OUTBREEDING AT SCALE

    https://occamsrazormag.wordpress.com/2014/03/15/the-achilles-heel-of-northern-europeans-outbreeding/THE WEAKNESS OF OUTBREEDING AT SCALE


    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-05 04:24:00 UTC

  • I REALLY DISLIKE RACISM One should blame one’s own people for their failures, no

    I REALLY DISLIKE RACISM

    One should blame one’s own people for their failures, not others for taking advantage of them. If you are occupied and conquered by others through immigration or displacement, it is no different from being occupied or conquered by others through religious conversion, political usurpation, or military conquest. It is your failure to prevent it. Not theirs for taking advantage of it.

    I see the world as families and tribes that can all prosper if we cooperate productively, without free riding, parasitism and predation. Unfortunately, free riding, parasitism and predation are much easier than mutually beneficial production. So humans prefer free riding, parasitism and predation whenever possible.

    I agree that the distribution of talents in the races is different, and that performatively, we can see that the median distribution of talents is indeed hierarchical.

    I agree that people act as political groups, acting in the favor of their group at the expense of other groups, whenever possible. I believe that the evidence tells us that race is on of the most influential factors in determining group membership, if not the most influential factor.

    I agree that because of those differences, our means and ends are different. But that does not mean that the different classes of all the races, and tribes, particularly the upper classes, cannot work together for the benefit of each tribe rather than abandoning the lower classes to conflict over resources and opportunities. The lower classes exist, and without their upper classes to grant them opportunities through superior competitiveness and cooperation, then they lose the competitive advantage that elites provide.

    The most heinous crime that an upper class can commit is to prey upon it’s own people, rather than provide competitive value for it’s lower classes, in relation to other lower classes.

    This is one of the primary reasons why the middle and lower classes support their elites and act as a group: because its in their interest to do so.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-01 06:01:00 UTC

  • RUSSIA: THE WHITE PEOPLE WHO FAILED (use this meme) Why is it, that throughout t

    RUSSIA: THE WHITE PEOPLE WHO FAILED

    (use this meme)

    Why is it, that throughout their history, at every opportunity, Russians consistently make the wrong decision? What is it that Russians incorrectly intuit about the world? Why do they have the lowest trust most corrupt nation of all the white peoples? Why is it that Russians are the one white people who have failed.

    If any people was ever incapable of self government, it’s Russians. If any people was less capable of governing others. It’s the Russians. What is it about the Russian character that causes them to consistently fail? What metaphysical assumption about the nature of man and his relationship to the world is so flawed that unless tightly bound to europe they contribute nothing to legacy of white people? Why is it that western peoples have dragged the entire world out of ignorance mysticism sickness and poverty, while russians try consistently to reverse the trend by dragging those white people near them into their failed civilization?

    Why is it that Russians have nothing to offer the world other than corruption, violence, fear and poverty?

    Why are Russians the only white people who have failed?

    Curt Doolittle

    Kiev

    ===

    FROM ANDRAS TOTH (edited)

    Russian peculiarity, to a certain extent is a consequence of geography – as with any other nation and state in premodern and to a certain extent, lesser degree in modern times.

    1) Few big rivers channeling into closed sees – obstructs trade and industrial development, favours self-sustaining closed economies.

    2) Far away from big cultural centres, which lessened the impact of other cultures, and learning by transactions, copying, emulating and transfer of ideas, new practices.

    3) Russia only entered into European history in the XVIIIth century, when expanded borders westward (absorbing Ukraine and Eastern Poland and the Baltics) and with the advent of railways, which made possible the larger scale involvement in trade and world markets.

    4) Unfortunately for Russia, when technically was able to join to the world economy, key countries moved to economic nationalism, beginning with Germany which imposed custom tariff on agriculture products to save East Prussian Junkers from Russian wheat and agricultural products.

    5) Nothing else left to Russia than turn to imperialism and try to expand to get to the seashore through the Balkans to circumvent German trade barrier.

    6) Hence the I.WW, where Russian expansion was blocked by Austria Hungary backed by Germany.

    7). Bolshevik revolution due to the extreme hardship and delegitimization of Czarist regime as a direct consequence of I. WW.

    8) Communist destruction.

    ===

    To which I’ll add:

    (1) the desert and steppe people are a problem and always have been, and have been exceedingly so for the Rus who sit between us, and those people. The chinese character is likewise informed by that same concern, although the chinese do have a nearly impassable desert between them and the ‘undesirable’ people. So just as we in the west have tried to keep the ‘near east’ at bay since the bronze age, the people in both Russia and China have tried to keep the ‘steppe’ people at bay – and failed most of the time. The mongols the most obvious case.

    (2) When Russians sought to modernize, the had the choice of selecting european or byzantine christianity. They chose poorly. Their main trading partner was still byzantium / Islam. The origin of much of the Rus culture is slave trade with Byzantium / Islam.

    (3) As a large poor backward country, they kept their expropriation serfdom until a couple of hundred years ago, the better of the Czars couldn’t modernize fast enough, the soviets (the underclasses) restored that totalitarianism. It’s a very nihilistic low trust culture that seeks easy solutions to problems and has no problem with the win-lose ethic. The win-win ethic is something they actually assume is some kind of deception.

    (4) Without the catholic church’s ban on intermarriage, the west would not have broken familial and tribal bonds, and we would not have outbred, and created the high trust society. Although one reason we broke those bonds easily was that north sea peoples had already been practicing outbreeding and manorialism, which is the origin of the protestant ethic. Not much protestant about it.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-01 04:15:00 UTC

  • Why Squander Inheritance Through Redistribution?

    [W]hy should I squander my earnings through redistribution? Why should I squander my savings through redistribution? Why should I squander my culture’s high trust norms through redistribution? And why should I squander my genes through dysgenic redistribution? If you claim to have rights to your earnings, to your life, and to your property, then why do you only have those rights and not the right to your other forms of capital? My purpose is to promote my genes, even at the expense of others genes. If we can cooperate while I do that then that’s fine. But if we cannot cooperate while I do that, then there is no point in cooperation. We all demonstrate our time preference. That’s mine. That’s everyone on earth’s preference other than W.E.I.R.D’s – who are demonstrably suicidal. Squandering your inheritance is suicidal.

  • Why Squander Inheritance Through Redistribution?

    [W]hy should I squander my earnings through redistribution? Why should I squander my savings through redistribution? Why should I squander my culture’s high trust norms through redistribution? And why should I squander my genes through dysgenic redistribution? If you claim to have rights to your earnings, to your life, and to your property, then why do you only have those rights and not the right to your other forms of capital? My purpose is to promote my genes, even at the expense of others genes. If we can cooperate while I do that then that’s fine. But if we cannot cooperate while I do that, then there is no point in cooperation. We all demonstrate our time preference. That’s mine. That’s everyone on earth’s preference other than W.E.I.R.D’s – who are demonstrably suicidal. Squandering your inheritance is suicidal.