http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-27/where-americas-immigrants-come
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-06 01:47:00 UTC
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-27/where-americas-immigrants-come
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-06 01:47:00 UTC
“THE WHITE FALLACY: THE ARISTOCRACY OF EVERYBODY”
You know, most of my criticisms are directed at the ridiculous beliefs of white people. I don’t blame others for their evolutionary strategy nearly as much as I blame my tribe for it’s vulnerability to the evolutionary strategies of others. Particularly when all that’s being acquired in exchange is short term status signals – the most hedonistic form of conspicuous consumption, by those undeserving of them.
ON GOVERNMENT
If you have an aristocratic pagan monarchy and judiciary that denies access to political power, leaving everyone with the necessity of participation in the market, plus rigid property rights including prohibitions on inbreeding and near-breeding, mandatory language adoption, universal standing, and pay-to-enforce rather than redistribution, and the requirement for operationalism in public speech, then I am not sure it matters what religions you rely upon.
ON RELIGION
Problem with christianity is it’s anti-rational, anti-tribal, and politically weak because it’s pacifist in its current state. Without the aristocracy to cooperate with the church, it is powerless. The Problem with islam is static knowledge, mystical dogma, anti-rationalism, inbreeding, and un-earned, mandatory respect. Problem with hinduism is mysticism, abandonment of reality and inbreeding. Problem with Buddhism is prescriptive inaction, detachment and inbreeding. Problem with judaism, is institutionalized deception via obscurantism, and parasitism. But regardless of these various verbal means of forcible indoctrination into a system of arbitrary cooperation – monarchy, paganism, property rights and scientific speech (operationalism) limit the damage that can be done by each of ALL of them.
ON ENFORCEMENT
The same goes for levels of impulsivity and violence. I am not convinced that the more impulsive tribes would not be better off constraining their own with violence rather than by incarceration, and less impulsive tribes better off constraining their own with ostracization and incarceration. We are unequal in both ability and incentives.
“THE WHITE FALLACY: THE ARISTOCRACY OF EVERYBODY”
This enlightenment fallacy that everyone can join the aristocracy is the source of as much suffering in the world as is the combined mysticism of the scriptural religions.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
The Philosophy of Aristocracy.
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-04 11:38:00 UTC
ON THE COMPATIBLE PREDATORY STRATEGIES OF WHITES AND JEWS
(truth, optimistic, politically incorrect)
—“The backbone of the race denial movement was a specific radical Jewish subculture that had become entirely within the mainstream of the American Jewish community by the early twentieth century—the subject of Chapters 2and 3 of The Culture of Critique (see also here). There is excellent evidence for their strong Jewish identifications, their concern with specific Jewish issues such as anti-Semitism, and for their hostility and sense of moral and intellectual superiority toward the traditional people and culture of America.Jonathan Marks is a contemporary example of this long and dishonorable tradition.”—
Eh… Well, on one hand its true, and there isn’t anything novel about the argument – it’s central to the jewish enlightenment: how to use secular arguments to justify retention of jewish group evolutionary strategy. On the other hand, if a people, white people in this case, are susceptible to self-hatred, excessive gullibility, and universalism, I tend to blame the gullible not those trying to justify fitting into society.
Whites have an exceptional evolutionary strategy: high trust universalism, cult of the warrior, organized arms, technology, conquest and colonization. This is an evolutionary strategy for a minority that must compete against wealthier and more numerous peoples. Decentralization is a very powerful force for competing against centralized societies better able to concentrate force. Conversely, Jews have traditionally relied upon a more parasitic rather than competitive or colonial strategy. These two strategies actually help one another because each group basically needs the other, because it avoids the specializations of the other.
But we can’t deny that christians are responsible for predatory colonialism and jews for the promulgation of, and absurd success at, creating pseudosciences and pseudo moral arguments justifying parasitism.
Just how is is. We whites shouldn’t be exporting war and colonization even if it drags people out of ignorance and poverty. And jews shouldn’t be propagating pseudosciences to justify their inclusion in society while retaining their parasitism. But we do. ‘Cause its been an evolutionary success to do so. And evolutionary success matters. You can criticize someone’s evolutionary success. If it’s guns, germs and steel, or if its pseudoscience and parasitism the difference is irrelevant. They’re both means of predation upon others.
I tend to not deny the truth of our past actions, but to ask what we can do going forward to take advantage of our natural superiorities without parasitism and predation.
Curt Doolittle
(edited and reposted for archival purposes)
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-03 15:52:00 UTC
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2014/06/kevin-macdonald-on-nicholas-wade.html?m=1Sorry. Arguments against race are simply effective arguments against white people. Science is solving what ideology denies.
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-03 06:45:00 UTC
ON THE COMPATIBLE PREDATORY STRATEGIES OF WHITES AND JEWS (truth, optimistic, politically incorrect) —“The backbone of the race denial movement was a specific radical Jewish subculture that had become entirely within the mainstream of the American Jewish community by the early twentieth century—the subject of Chapters 2and 3 of The Culture of Critique (see also here). There is excellent evidence for their strong Jewish identifications, their concern with specific Jewish issues such as anti-Semitism, and for their hostility and sense of moral and intellectual superiority toward the traditional people and culture of America.Jonathan Marks is a contemporary example of this long and dishonorable tradition.”— Eh… [W]ell, on one hand its true, and there isn’t anything novel about the argument – it’s central to the jewish enlightenment: how to use secular arguments to justify retention of jewish group evolutionary strategy. On the other hand, if a people, white people in this case, are susceptible to self-hatred, excessive gullibility, and universalism, I tend to blame the gullible not those trying to justify fitting into society. Whites have an exceptional evolutionary strategy: high trust universalism, cult of the warrior, organized arms, technology, conquest and colonization. This is an evolutionary strategy for a minority that must compete against wealthier and more numerous peoples. Decentralization is a very powerful force for competing against centralized societies better able to concentrate force. Conversely, Jews have traditionally relied upon a more parasitic rather than competitive or colonial strategy. These two strategies actually help one another because each group basically needs the other, because it avoids the specializations of the other. But we can’t deny that christians are responsible for predatory colonialism and jews for the promulgation of, and absurd success at, creating pseudosciences and pseudo moral arguments justifying parasitism. Just how is is. We whites shouldn’t be exporting war and colonization even if it drags people out of ignorance and poverty. And jews shouldn’t be propagating pseudosciences to justify their inclusion in society while retaining their parasitism. But we do. ‘Cause its been an evolutionary success to do so. And evolutionary success matters. You can criticize someone’s evolutionary success. If it’s guns, germs and steel, or if its pseudoscience and parasitism the difference is irrelevant. They’re both means of predation upon others. I tend to not deny the truth of our past actions, but to ask what we can do going forward to take advantage of our natural superiorities without parasitism and predation. Curt Doolittle (edited and reposted for archival purposes)
ON THE COMPATIBLE PREDATORY STRATEGIES OF WHITES AND JEWS (truth, optimistic, politically incorrect) —“The backbone of the race denial movement was a specific radical Jewish subculture that had become entirely within the mainstream of the American Jewish community by the early twentieth century—the subject of Chapters 2and 3 of The Culture of Critique (see also here). There is excellent evidence for their strong Jewish identifications, their concern with specific Jewish issues such as anti-Semitism, and for their hostility and sense of moral and intellectual superiority toward the traditional people and culture of America.Jonathan Marks is a contemporary example of this long and dishonorable tradition.”— Eh… [W]ell, on one hand its true, and there isn’t anything novel about the argument – it’s central to the jewish enlightenment: how to use secular arguments to justify retention of jewish group evolutionary strategy. On the other hand, if a people, white people in this case, are susceptible to self-hatred, excessive gullibility, and universalism, I tend to blame the gullible not those trying to justify fitting into society. Whites have an exceptional evolutionary strategy: high trust universalism, cult of the warrior, organized arms, technology, conquest and colonization. This is an evolutionary strategy for a minority that must compete against wealthier and more numerous peoples. Decentralization is a very powerful force for competing against centralized societies better able to concentrate force. Conversely, Jews have traditionally relied upon a more parasitic rather than competitive or colonial strategy. These two strategies actually help one another because each group basically needs the other, because it avoids the specializations of the other. But we can’t deny that christians are responsible for predatory colonialism and jews for the promulgation of, and absurd success at, creating pseudosciences and pseudo moral arguments justifying parasitism. Just how is is. We whites shouldn’t be exporting war and colonization even if it drags people out of ignorance and poverty. And jews shouldn’t be propagating pseudosciences to justify their inclusion in society while retaining their parasitism. But we do. ‘Cause its been an evolutionary success to do so. And evolutionary success matters. You can criticize someone’s evolutionary success. If it’s guns, germs and steel, or if its pseudoscience and parasitism the difference is irrelevant. They’re both means of predation upon others. I tend to not deny the truth of our past actions, but to ask what we can do going forward to take advantage of our natural superiorities without parasitism and predation. Curt Doolittle (edited and reposted for archival purposes)
http://feedly.com/k/1mGesXwSURNAME DISTRIBUTION CHANGES
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-01 13:13:00 UTC
http://feedly.com/k/1hKmFahWheat farming produces individualism and trust. Rice farming nepotism and low trust.
Source date (UTC): 2014-05-31 16:14:00 UTC
DIVERSITY PROVIDES FOR DIVIDE AND RULE WITHOUT EXTERNAL AGENTS
by Alex Mark Nieora
—“Equally it may be said that diversity is easier to govern as diversity necessarily entails fragmented and divided cultures, preferences, nationalities, languages and abilities that may lack an overarching and unifying constant between themselves. Thereby diversity provides in itself the division of divide and rule politics without even necessitating the implementation of external agents of division.”—
BUT THE FALLACY OF RAWLS REMAINS
–“However, diversity is also the hallmark and bedrock – the sine qua non really – of liberty and tolerance. So diversity is a challenge. It is a challenge also in regards to tolerating the intolerant. This is a dilemma that was confronted by certain legal philosophers such as John Rawls in his later work The Law of The Peoples, which addresses international politics.
Previously in A Theory of Justice, he explains the reasons why diversity must be tolerated for not only the greater but the individual good through his concept of the original position.
In the Law of The Peoples Rawls argues that the legitimacy of a liberal international order is contingent on tolerating decent peoples. Rawls held that decent peoples might have state religions and deny adherents of minority faiths the right to hold positions of power within the state, and might indeed organise political participation via consultation hierarchies rather than elections.
However, he maintained that no well-ordered peoples may violate human rights or behave in an externally aggressive manner. He held peoples do not have the right to the mutual respect and tolerance possessed by liberal and decent peoples.”—
“DECENT PEOPLE”
I’ll define decent in Propertarian terms: those people who have suppressed all free riding from criminal to ethical to moral to conspiratorial. One is more decent than another if one suppresses more free riding than another.
(I despise Rawls as an obscurantist. Hoppe is right. The only moral question is property.)
Source date (UTC): 2014-05-30 07:20:00 UTC
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21602695-vladimir-putin-pivots-eastward-should-america-be-worried-best-frenemiesNOW THAT PUTIN REALIZES HE’S WHITE, MAYBE HE CAN START ACTING LIKE IT.
(Asia for Asians. India for Indians. Africa for Africans. Europa for Europeans. And the deserts for muslims. Sorry Vald. You have bad, egoistic, ignorant, advisors. You don’t get to play both sides when you have 140M people and 11 time zones to defend, and the Chinese Empire is on your doorstep.)
Source date (UTC): 2014-05-26 07:06:00 UTC