Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • PERCEPTIONS: FAMILY STRUCTURE, TRUST AND CLASS Protestants practice the Absolute

    http://www.quora.com/Ethnic-and-Cultural-Differences-1/What-are-the-most-difficult-cultural-understandings-the-French-from-France-have-to-face-when-living-in-North-America/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=1FRENCH PERCEPTIONS: FAMILY STRUCTURE, TRUST AND CLASS

    Protestants practice the Absolute Nuclear Family and the High Trust Society. In the Protestant (northern european) social model, high trust is extended to non-family members. In the catholic countries, they practice the extended family model, and high trust is retained for use only by family members, and not extended to ‘everyone you meet’.

    This explains the size of statism, and the authoritarianism in France, versus the libertarianism and rate of entrepreneurship in Anglo countries. The lower the trust in your polity, the more demand there is for authority to organize society, organize production and prevent conflicts. The more trust in your society, the less need demand (or need) there is for the authoritarian organization of society and production. This explains the difference between anglo high trust absolute nuclear, and french lower-trust extended families.

    Furthermore, as the original question positions, the high trust polity means that it is easier to take advantage of that trust and abuse it. So anglos demonstrate higher Altruistic Punishment of offenders, whereas the French do not.

    To French, Anglos appear to be ‘stupid’ and ‘dishonestly friendly’. And treat family members badly To anglos, the French appear to be ill mannered, if not outright rude, coddle laziness in the family; and the government appears to be predatory and corrupt. (In Quebec, it is possibly true.)

    SOME INTERESTING DATA

    1) In negotiations, who are the least hostile people in the world? Americans, Anglo-Canadians, and Germans. Who are the most hostile people in the world: the French. (The study counts the use of certain categories of words).

    2) In Canada, the Anglo immigrants came largely from the lower middle and middle classes. The French citizens of Quebec came disproportionately from the lower classes. This difference in classes provides greater insight into the different cultures than background alone.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-06 12:12:00 UTC

  • of inbreeders vs outbreeders. (Fascinating)

    http://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/08/12/theres-no-place-like-home/Houses of inbreeders vs outbreeders.

    (Fascinating)

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-04 09:41:00 UTC

  • WE ARE NOT AFRAID OF A NATIONALIST RUSSIA – NATIONALISM IS A GOOD THING WE NEED

    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/how-nationalism-came-to-dominate-russia-s-political-mainstream/504495.htmlNO WE ARE NOT AFRAID OF A NATIONALIST RUSSIA – NATIONALISM IS A GOOD THING WE NEED MORE OF

    We westerners are not terrified of a Nationalistic Russia. The Western right LOVES a nationalist Russia. We WANT a strong Russia. What the west doesn’t want, and the world doesn’t want, is a breakdown of the postwar consensus on fixed borders. And none of the eastern europeans want to be subjected to more Russian deceit, corruption, violence and murder. Russia is a corrupt country, with a corrupt government, and russians demonstrate low trust, and low regard for the commons. Europeans, even western europeans, desire a high trust western society, with high regard for the commons. Russians depend on resource wealth to compenate for their low trust and corrupt society. Eastern europeans cannot depend upon resource wealth – they must generate economies that participate with the rest of the world.

    All this moralizing and propaganda from Russia is just populist nonsense. We assumed Russia would mature into a modern democracy by slowly building an economy that integrated with the rest of the world.

    A nationalist Russia that is militarily strong is good for the west since it keeps Russia’s eastern conflict zone, and southern spheres of influence, with their 90 IQ societies, from being a problem for the rest of the world. The west needs a strong Russia. What the west doesn’t need is for Russia to spread the corruption, dishonesty, and low-trust of Russian society to countries that must participate in the world economy to obtain a western standard of living.

    It’s not complicated.

    ——

    LETTER TO RUSSIA FROM KIEV

    Dear Russia,

    We love you ok. You’re white. So we actually consider you part of the tribe. And yes, we westerners are kind of destroying Western civilization with abandon. And you’re right to reject that. And while we really don’t want to be in conflict with you, we do ask you to please keep your dysfunctional family, and dysfunctional political problems in your own house. We have problems but your problems are worse. Corruption, deception, pseudoscience, alcoholism, violence and mass murder are things russians are really good at. And we really don’t need you to export them to us. I mean, you killed enough of us already, haven’t you?

    And you kind of screwed up right? You could have let the USA continue withdrawing from Europe, softly guaranteed Europe’s safety militarily, and protect shipping on the high seas, and continued to spend the next 20 years integrating Russian resource dependence into the western economies. You could have imported western technology and law, behavior, and exported ‘resources, manliness, nationalism, and unity’ to the west. You could have accomplished the unification of the circumpolar peoples.

    But you screwed up. Yet again.

    Why is it that Russians, at every opportunity, make the wrong decision? It’s just amazing. It’s exasperating. Every time you can play the long run you screw it up.

    Please get your act together, and lead.

    Russia: why are you constantly the white people who fail?

    Thanks.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-04 02:12:00 UTC

  • Tell the truth: Anglo Do your duty: German Find a way: Jewish Say I am supposed

    Tell the truth: Anglo

    Do your duty: German

    Find a way: Jewish

    Say I am supposed to say: Chinese.

    Truth Is A Risky Thing, understood but avoided: Russian

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-03 06:05:00 UTC

  • DUCHESNE : RE-NATIONALIZE CLASSICAL LIBERALISM —– Evolution is now being play

    DUCHESNE : RE-NATIONALIZE CLASSICAL LIBERALISM

    —–

    Evolution is now being played out in the arena of cultural conflict, but there are still winners and losers in the strict Darwinian sense as Western lands are opened up to all the peoples of the world.

    Duchesne concludes that

    –the way out of the crisis of Western nihilism is to re-nationalize liberalism, throw away the cultural Marxist notion that freedom means liberation from all identities not chosen by the individual, and accentuate the historical and natural-ethnic basis of European identity.–

    I couldn’t agree more.

    —–

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-01 15:27:00 UTC

  • DONT BLAME THEM. **THE PROBLEM IS US** You know, the problem isn’t catholics, is

    DONT BLAME THEM. **THE PROBLEM IS US**

    You know, the problem isn’t catholics, islam, or judasim, or their least effective low trust peer: gypsies. Its **us***. If your society is defenseless militarily it is your fault for not devoting sufficient effort and resources to defenses. If your society is colonizable, then you have not worked hard enough to prevent colonization. If your society is convertible, then you have not devoted enough resources to resist conversion. If your society is deceivable you are not devoting enough resources to preventing deception. If you lack liberty, you are not devoting enough resources to the violence required to prevent tyranny.

    We have been colonized, converted, and deceived with pseudoscience.

    Guns, Germs, Steel ….. requires Institutions and Philosophy.

    We worked too hard at production and not hard enough at defense.

    COOPERATION DOES NOT MEAN SACRIFICE

    Source date (UTC): 2014-08-01 05:53:00 UTC

  • PATHOLOGICAL ALTRUISM: A CATASTROPHIC GENETIC DEFECT. We can go through our gene

    PATHOLOGICAL ALTRUISM: A CATASTROPHIC GENETIC DEFECT.

    We can go through our genetic strengths, and those of other races. We can go through the weaknesses of other races. But we fail to answer our one genetic defect that is jus as important as verbal IQ, spatial IQ, Impulsivity, or physical durability: our two sided sword of altruism.

    We will grant trust first to anyone, before they earn it. And we are less sensitive to outsiders than any other group.

    For these reasons, while we once ranged from Ireland to Egypt, to Mongolia, our people are now pressed up against the polar climes. We cannot defend ourselves from our own cognitive limitations. Our evolution failed us. We lack sufficient fear of outsiders to compete with the groups that take advantage of our lack of fear of outsiders to colonize and conquer us. Worse, our elites have turned on us, and in the name of corporate governance, universalism, and progressivism, sell off our ancient history, and our entire tribe in exchange for early retirement and the self gratifying status signal that they are conducting charity rather than reverse colonialism.

    Enough.

    We come first.

    Those of us without the genetic defect must defend our tribe from its own illness.

    (Yeah. I like that one. That’s got legs.)

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 15:49:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.unz.com/runz/does-race-exist-do-hills-exist/

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 04:25:00 UTC

  • HICKS, MACDONALD, DUCHESNE, HAIDT, DOOLITTLE You see. We have an intellectual co

    HICKS, MACDONALD, DUCHESNE, HAIDT, DOOLITTLE

    You see. We have an intellectual core. 😉

    Independently we come to similar conclusions by different means:

    – Stephen Hicks by intellectual history.

    – Kevin Macdonald by psychology, evolutionary biology, and history.

    – Ricardo Duchesne by marxism and then history and intellectual history.

    – Haidt by political psychology

    – Doolittle by calculability (not computability): property, the logic of cooperation, institutions of cooperation, and evolutionary morality. (which is a certain form of psychology in itself)

    WE HAVE DATA NOW – EVIDENCE

    Previous generations could only theorize about the outcomes of socialism/postmodernism/progressivism, Rothbardian Libertinism, and neo-conservatism. But we have data.

    And data is evidence.

    And the evidence is in.

    Unaligned or not. Organized or not. We have a movement.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-31 03:25:00 UTC

  • ITS TIME TO CARE ABOUT OURSELVES —“I’ve reached the point where our own people

    ITS TIME TO CARE ABOUT OURSELVES

    —“I’ve reached the point where our own people have enough problems that I don’t have a lot of time for those of others. No-one else cares about us. In fact, no-one else cares about anyone but themselves.”—

    Good mission statement.

    “We have enough problems. no one cares about us. they care about themselves, We need to care about ourselves.”

    Aristocratic Egalitarianism.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 01:54:00 UTC