Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • TWO BOOK THIS SPRING ON THE NORTH SEA-BALTIC PEOPLE’S (reading lists) Lots of cr

    TWO BOOK THIS SPRING ON THE NORTH SEA-BALTIC PEOPLE’S

    (reading lists)

    Lots of criticism of Pye’s writing ability (North Sea). But the fact that the book exists is still a sign of momentum.

    North’s book (Baltic) doesn’t have any feedback yet and I can’t get my hands on it yet.

    But I have high hopes that the two books form a good basis, along with a history of the Hanseatic league, of the central thesis:

    **The North Sea / Baltic Kingdoms were the product of trade routes. And that, like the Aegean, trade, contract, trust, truth gave rise to reason and science.**

    So it appears to me that mankind faces a terrible choice: to develop writing first and authoritarian rule, or to inherit (adopt, import) writing, and develop commercial (civic) rule.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-10 04:30:00 UTC

  • THE ALTERNATE HISTORY OF MAN. (important) (inflammatory) Each wave of man was mo

    THE ALTERNATE HISTORY OF MAN.

    (important) (inflammatory)

    Each wave of man was more aggressive than the previous.

    Each wave of man exterminated the previous wave of man, whenever advantageous.

    Hunter-Gatherers had bigger brains but were less numerous and less aggressive.

    Northern Europeans with big brains are smarter with bigger brains and less aggressive.

    The Steppe/Desert/Levant has been kicking off waves of increasingly aggressive peoples for thousands of years.

    The newer peoples are less intelligent, more reproductive, and more aggressive.

    They are the future of man.

    Unless we change again, to keep them at bay.

    The future isn’t one of achieving supra-human intelligence.

    It’s one of decreasing intelligence and increasing aggression.

    And the world is running out of the old species with calmer, smarter, bigger brains.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-10 04:06:00 UTC

  • MUST REALLY SUCK FOR AMERINDIANS TO KNOW THEY WIPED OUT THEIR PREDECESSORS. (Kin

    MUST REALLY SUCK FOR AMERINDIANS TO KNOW THEY WIPED OUT THEIR PREDECESSORS.

    (Kinda gets white people off the hook.)

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-09 16:05:00 UTC

  • I’m In This Fight For All of Humanity

    [I]’M IN THIS FIGHT, NOT JUST FOR MY TRIBE, BUT FOR ALL OF HUMANITY I don’t really care about race. I acknowledge our differences, and I write about our differences as a small number of differences in cognitive distributions. But race and racism doesn’t help me or anyone else solve any material problem. I know the white nationalist movement uses my work, but I am just as happy if EVERY nationalist movement uses my work, because it will make all of us happier if we do. (Because we can use trade policy to offset our differences in distributions, and within any nation we can use the norms appropriate for our distributions.)

    But bitching about other people’s evolutionary strategies is just gossip. It means nothing. It doesn’t fix anything. It doesn’t provide a political solution to the problem of prosperity, kin selection, beneficial evolution, and the ultimate achievement of mankind. So my objective is to provide solutions. And those solutions should assist all of us regardless of our race and tribe. Because all our races and tribes are stuck on this planet together. And as such, we need a way of cooperating, even if that way of cooperating is to peaceably choose not to cooperate. And Truth is enough. If we eliminate deceit from the public discourse, and eliminate theft from the public trough, then that will force the outcome you probably desire. But I will not engage in racial gossip. I am just as interested in helping Whites, Africans, Asians, and Indonesians, achieve liberty and prosperity as I am my own people. We had enough of this damage done by the Enlightenment. And I just want to fix it for everyone. OK? Good. So I support nationalism. All of it. For everyone. Becuase the family defeats the corporation as a means of human reproductive cooperation.

  • I’m In This Fight For All of Humanity

    [I]’M IN THIS FIGHT, NOT JUST FOR MY TRIBE, BUT FOR ALL OF HUMANITY I don’t really care about race. I acknowledge our differences, and I write about our differences as a small number of differences in cognitive distributions. But race and racism doesn’t help me or anyone else solve any material problem. I know the white nationalist movement uses my work, but I am just as happy if EVERY nationalist movement uses my work, because it will make all of us happier if we do. (Because we can use trade policy to offset our differences in distributions, and within any nation we can use the norms appropriate for our distributions.)

    But bitching about other people’s evolutionary strategies is just gossip. It means nothing. It doesn’t fix anything. It doesn’t provide a political solution to the problem of prosperity, kin selection, beneficial evolution, and the ultimate achievement of mankind. So my objective is to provide solutions. And those solutions should assist all of us regardless of our race and tribe. Because all our races and tribes are stuck on this planet together. And as such, we need a way of cooperating, even if that way of cooperating is to peaceably choose not to cooperate. And Truth is enough. If we eliminate deceit from the public discourse, and eliminate theft from the public trough, then that will force the outcome you probably desire. But I will not engage in racial gossip. I am just as interested in helping Whites, Africans, Asians, and Indonesians, achieve liberty and prosperity as I am my own people. We had enough of this damage done by the Enlightenment. And I just want to fix it for everyone. OK? Good. So I support nationalism. All of it. For everyone. Becuase the family defeats the corporation as a means of human reproductive cooperation.

  • I Love Everybody. So Go Hang Some Politician 🙂

    [I] Love everybody. I’m a Christian.  That’s what it means to be Christian. It’s one thing to deny the differences in our distributions. It’s one thing deny we vote in blocks. One thing to want to limit sacrifices to kin. But it’s something altogether different to fucking hate people. This is why I get frustrated with the right. We have lunatics and autistics in libertarianism, and they hate the abstract thing called the state. But the right has these lunatics that just hate other humans. Instead of saying ‘what is wrong with us that we fail to protect ourselves?’ they criticize others for satisfying their own strategies. THE PROBLEM IS US, NOT THEM. You wanna hate? Hate OUR people that did this. But don’t others for seeing the walled garden and wanting to live in it. That’s insane.

    I want to know how to protect my tribe from losing its competitive advantage: high trust and the commons. And I’m as kin-selection oriented as the next guy. And I don’t like immigrating MORE of the below 105 median peoples into a high trust society when I can see Mathusian limits to work on the horizon. But I don’t hate people. People are pretty stupid wetware machines that just follow breadcrumbs. I get frustrated like everyone else. I get angry like everyone else. But you know, the blame is due the guy that’s looking at you in the mirror who isn’t out there shooting some politician in the head for what he or she has done. It’s not in the people wanting to live in our high trust society. Find a way not to leave the breadcrumbs.

    Source: Curt Doolittle

  • I Love Everybody. So Go Hang Some Politician 🙂

    [I] Love everybody. I’m a Christian.  That’s what it means to be Christian. It’s one thing to deny the differences in our distributions. It’s one thing deny we vote in blocks. One thing to want to limit sacrifices to kin. But it’s something altogether different to fucking hate people. This is why I get frustrated with the right. We have lunatics and autistics in libertarianism, and they hate the abstract thing called the state. But the right has these lunatics that just hate other humans. Instead of saying ‘what is wrong with us that we fail to protect ourselves?’ they criticize others for satisfying their own strategies. THE PROBLEM IS US, NOT THEM. You wanna hate? Hate OUR people that did this. But don’t others for seeing the walled garden and wanting to live in it. That’s insane.

    I want to know how to protect my tribe from losing its competitive advantage: high trust and the commons. And I’m as kin-selection oriented as the next guy. And I don’t like immigrating MORE of the below 105 median peoples into a high trust society when I can see Mathusian limits to work on the horizon. But I don’t hate people. People are pretty stupid wetware machines that just follow breadcrumbs. I get frustrated like everyone else. I get angry like everyone else. But you know, the blame is due the guy that’s looking at you in the mirror who isn’t out there shooting some politician in the head for what he or she has done. It’s not in the people wanting to live in our high trust society. Find a way not to leave the breadcrumbs.

    Source: Curt Doolittle

  • I LOVE EVERYBODY It’s one thing to deny the differences in our distributions. It

    I LOVE EVERYBODY

    It’s one thing to deny the differences in our distributions. It’s one thing deny we vote in blocks. One thing to want to limit sacrifices to kin. But it’s something altogether different to fucking hate people. This is why I get frustrated with the right. We have lunatics and autistics in libertarianism, and they hate the abstract thing called the state. But the right has these lunatics that just hate other humans.

    Instead of saying ‘what is wrong with us that we fail to protect ourselves?’ they criticize others for satisfying their own strategies. THE PROBLEM IS US, NOT THEM. You wanna hate? Hate OUR people that did this. But don’t others for seeing the walled garden and wanting to live in it. That’s insane.

    I want to know how to protect my tribe from losing its competitive advantage: high trust and the commons. And I’m as kin-selection oriented as the next guy. And I don’t like immigrating MORE of the below 105 median peoples into a high trust society when I can see Mathusian limits to work on the horizon.

    But I don’t hate people. People are pretty stupid wetware machines that just follow breadcrumbs. I get frustrated like everyone else. I get angry like everyone else. But you know, the blame is the guy that’s looking at you in the mirror who isn’t out there shooting some politician in the head for what he or she has done. It’s not in the people wanting to live in our high trust society.

    Find a way not to leave the breadcrumbs.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-03 14:17:00 UTC

  • I’M IN THIS FIGHT, NOT JUST FOR MY TRIBE, BUT FOR ALL OF HUMANITY I don’t really

    I’M IN THIS FIGHT, NOT JUST FOR MY TRIBE, BUT FOR ALL OF HUMANITY

    I don’t really care about race. I acknowledge our differences, and I write about our differences as a small number of differences in cognitive distributions. But race and racism doesn’t help me or anyone else solve any material problem. I know the white nationalist movement uses my work, but I am just as happy if EVERY nationalist movement uses my work, because it will make all of us happier if we do. (Because we can use trade policy to offset our differences in distributions, and within any nation we can use the norms appropriate for our distributions.)

    But bitching about other people’s evolutionary strategies is just gossip. It means nothing. It doesn’t fix anything. It doesn’t provide a political solution to the problem of prosperity, kin selection, beneficial evolution, and the ultimate achievement of mankind.

    So my objective is to provide solutions. And those solutions should assist all of us regardless of our race and tribe. Because all our races and tribes are stuck on this planet together. And as such, we need a way of cooperating, even if that way of cooperating is to peaceably choose not to cooperate.

    And Truth is enough. If we eliminate deceit from the public discourse, and eliminate theft from the public trough, then that will force the outcome you probably desire.

    But I will not engage in racial gossip. I am just as interested in helping Africans, Asians, and Indonesians, achieve liberty and prosperity as I am my own people.

    We had enough of this damage done by the Enlightenment. And I just want to fix it for everyone.

    OK?

    Good. So I support nationalism. All of it. For everyone. Becuase the family defeats the corporation as a means of human reproductive cooperation.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-03 06:01:00 UTC

  • AMERICAN WEALTH (from elsewhere) American prosperity is determined by the follow

    AMERICAN WEALTH

    (from elsewhere)

    American prosperity is determined by the following:

    1) the anglo-german proclivity for paying the high personal cost of truth-telling in all walks of life – it is the greatest tax we pay. It is also unique in the world. if you aren’t germanic, or at least northern European, you’re probably irreparably corrupt and a liar and you don’t even realize it.

    2) the anglo common law which rapidly adapts to new forms of parasitism as quickly as they are invented.

    3) the anglo (non-continental) common law bias, such that we permit everything and resolve conflicts later in court, vs the continental bias that requires approval from some authority in advance in order to prevent conflicts in court.

    4) Prior to 1963, the requirement for membership in the absolute nuclear family prior to engaging in reproduction.

    5) The sale of a new continent to new homeowners using fiat credit.

    6) The sale of consumer goods to homeowners previously incapable of home ownership.

    7) The USA’s use of it’s inherited British empire (navy and bases) to set terms of international finance and trade.

    8) The stock market which creates a lottery effect for innovators.

    9) It’s stable currency

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-01 12:10:00 UTC