Why GREECE, GREXIT, and “EUROPE” are an unnatural proto-Nazi “Aryan” construction — or why putting Teutons and Greeks together isn’t the smartest (and most stable) idea.
Nor is it natural.
The least *unnatural* union for Greece is some sort of *loose* Mediterranean League of City States (and another minor Balkan connection). But again, it would need to stay fuzzy –i.e., should you want to use history/culture, use them properly (“annales” style).
+ There are two natural cultural (eventually leading by mixing to ethnic) demarcations: butter vs olive oil (and eventually a third, the palm tree). The demarcation is robust: if people have the same food, they are the same (or eventually through mixing) become the same. Now if a nonblind but deaf Martian visited Turkey and Greece, he would think they are the same people (same with Lebanon and Western Syria). If words are different, body language in the Levant, Greece, Turkey and Southern Italy is similar. “Una faccia, una razza”. But a bureaucrat blinded by constructions would put the Greek in the same unit as the German, and bundle the Turk with the Huns in the Altai mountains near China.
+ But Mediterraneans are integrated as a socio-cultural unit. This is not just recent; the integration is 5000 years old in the East and 3000 in the West. The trend to “Europeanize” came with German scholarship which starting in 1820s (one Müller) tried to kill any Levantine/Babylonian connection to Greece, trying to give Germany some nobility in its historical roots, while French scholarship was until then considering Greece as deeply rooted in the Levant and Asia Minor, as a continuum from Babylon to the Phoenicians to classical Greece (mythology says that Europa herself was Phoenician). The rise of antisemitism played a part: the Teutonic cultural separation from the Levantine Canaanite race (the Jews and Phoenicians had near-identical language and ethnicity).
+ The Levant and what is now Greece spent at least 1000 years in the same political unit Rome-Byzantium and another few hunded in the Ottoman Empire; the Greeks and the Germans have now about 40 years together.
+ The nation-state started integrating the Mediterranean people. During the 19th Century only a few coastal cities such as Marseille and Toulon in Southern France spoke French, the rest spoke Provencal or Catalan.
+ The idea of a Mediterranean unit is not popular. Partly because it has been linked to Mussolini.
+ The Mycenians did not use a Semitic language (linear B). But the word Knossos (the capital) means “settlement” in Phoenician.
+ If a French person looks like a Mediterranean and speaks French, it is by colonization. The same applies to the “Aryanization” of Greece, to the “Turkification” of Asia Minor, and the “Arabization” of Syria or the “Aryanization” of India. Arian/Semitic/Hun is not a distinction beyond the language spoken.
Theme: Ethnoculture
-
Taleb is On Board with Tribalism
Why GREECE, GREXIT, and “EUROPE” are an unnatural proto-Nazi “Aryan” construction — or why putting Teutons and Greeks together isn’t the smartest (and most stable) idea. Nor is it natural. The least *unnatural* union for Greece is some sort of *loose* Mediterranean League of City States (and another minor Balkan connection). But again, it would need to stay fuzzy –i.e., should you want to use history/culture, use them properly (“annales” style). + There are two natural cultural (eventually leading by mixing to ethnic) demarcations: butter vs olive oil (and eventually a third, the palm tree). The demarcation is robust: if people have the same food, they are the same (or eventually through mixing) become the same. Now if a nonblind but deaf Martian visited Turkey and Greece, he would think they are the same people (same with Lebanon and Western Syria). If words are different, body language in the Levant, Greece, Turkey and Southern Italy is similar. “Una faccia, una razza”. But a bureaucrat blinded by constructions would put the Greek in the same unit as the German, and bundle the Turk with the Huns in the Altai mountains near China. + But Mediterraneans are integrated as a socio-cultural unit. This is not just recent; the integration is 5000 years old in the East and 3000 in the West. The trend to “Europeanize” came with German scholarship which starting in 1820s (one Müller) tried to kill any Levantine/Babylonian connection to Greece, trying to give Germany some nobility in its historical roots, while French scholarship was until then considering Greece as deeply rooted in the Levant and Asia Minor, as a continuum from Babylon to the Phoenicians to classical Greece (mythology says that Europa herself was Phoenician). The rise of antisemitism played a part: the Teutonic cultural separation from the Levantine Canaanite race (the Jews and Phoenicians had near-identical language and ethnicity). + The Levant and what is now Greece spent at least 1000 years in the same political unit Rome-Byzantium and another few hunded in the Ottoman Empire; the Greeks and the Germans have now about 40 years together. + The nation-state started integrating the Mediterranean people. During the 19th Century only a few coastal cities such as Marseille and Toulon in Southern France spoke French, the rest spoke Provencal or Catalan. + The idea of a Mediterranean unit is not popular. Partly because it has been linked to Mussolini. + The Mycenians did not use a Semitic language (linear B). But the word Knossos (the capital) means “settlement” in Phoenician. + If a French person looks like a Mediterranean and speaks French, it is by colonization. The same applies to the “Aryanization” of Greece, to the “Turkification” of Asia Minor, and the “Arabization” of Syria or the “Aryanization” of India. Arian/Semitic/Hun is not a distinction beyond the language spoken. -
Bronze Age Europe – Where We Come From
RECOMMENDED BRONZE AGE EUROPEAN HISTORY BOOKS
- JP Mallory: In Search of Indo Europeans
- The Horse, the Wheel and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World
- The Early Germans by Malcolm Todd
- The Ancient Paths: Discovering the Lost Map of Celtic Europe
Source: Curt Doolittle
-
Bronze Age Europe – Where We Come From
RECOMMENDED BRONZE AGE EUROPEAN HISTORY BOOKS
- JP Mallory: In Search of Indo Europeans
- The Horse, the Wheel and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World
- The Early Germans by Malcolm Todd
- The Ancient Paths: Discovering the Lost Map of Celtic Europe
Source: Curt Doolittle
-
THE THREE GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGIES Feminine: Aggressive Gossip: (jewish) Li
THE THREE GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGIES
Feminine: Aggressive Gossip: (jewish)
Libertarian: Aggressive Trade (anglo neo-puritan)
Masculine: Aggressive Violence (muslim)
Russian = ++Gossip +Violence -Trade
Chinese = +Gossip +Violence -Trade
I suppose that we can graph all cultures on these three dimensions.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-17 05:24:00 UTC
-
SO IS THIS RIGHT? Africa generated variation because it is actually quite a host
SO IS THIS RIGHT?
Africa generated variation because it is actually quite a hostile climate.
the first waves out were not aggressive people.
Each new wave has been more aggressive than the last, and exterminated, raped, mated with, or ate the previous generation.
At some point the steppe and desert started breeding aggression because of herding.
The steppe took over from africa as the primary means of evolving increased aggression.
This process has continued with the Indian civilzation first to be exterminated, then the iranian and byzantine. Then the many attacks on europe. The conquest and conversion of russia to an aggressive steppe culture.
Islam is an adaptation of religion for steppe and desert cultures.
Islam is the most aggressive religion-political system yet.
Only the chinese are wiling to resist it.
Is this right?
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-16 08:27:00 UTC
-
BEYOND RACE: It’s trade. Selection by Trade. Trade is eugenic
http://www.unz.com/pfrost/the-jews-of-west-africa/GETTING BEYOND RACE:
It’s trade. Selection by Trade. Trade is eugenic.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-15 05:08:00 UTC
-
UNIVERSALISM: LOVE OF MAN Sorry all, but while I argue to advance my tribe, I al
UNIVERSALISM: LOVE OF MAN
Sorry all, but while I argue to advance my tribe, I also seek to advance all tribes through aristocratic egalitarianism (meritocracy), testimonial truth, and propertarianism. My political solution is very simple: non-parasitism, voluntary exchange, rule of law, common law, jury and truth telling. Truth is enough to restore our civilization to greatness by a radical innovation in the construction of commons. And to do the same for any other civilization if they are able to learn truth telling.
I’ve been very consistent in my position: the only material differences between the races of man are caused by (a) differences in distributions of reproductive desirability and (b) differences in distributions of intelligence, aggressiveness, and impulsivity. And that these differences are caused by different rates of reproduction of the different classes.
There are exceptional people in all races and tribes. There are more exceptional people in the white tribe because we invented truth, because we suppressed the reproduction of the lower classes, and because we are less aggressive and impulsive – we have a lower time preference.
A population’s abilities determine the quality of it’s informal and formal institutions, and that those institutions are tragically imprisoning when combined with a population whose median is below 106. So the problem facing EVERY tribe is how to get its population above a median of 106. And in the future, that number might be even higher.
ANTI-PARASITISM, PREFERENCE FOR KIN-SELECTION, and SEPARATISM are not the same thing as NON-COOPERATION.
Our meritocratic aristocracies are marginally indifferent, and easily can cooperate, because they are not reliant on kin for information, signals, production, reproduction, and cooperation. It is not our similarities that cause conflict. It is the dissimilarities between our lower classes that cause us conflict.
I will sacrifice for my kin. I refuse parasitism by non-kin. I refuse to shift reproductive velocity from the upper to the lower classes no matter how profitable it is. I refuse to take the one truth telling civilization on earth and reduce it to yet another group of parasitic liars. I refuse to limit humanity’s future by surrendering our people to dysgenia.
But I also refuse to blame others for our failures. I refuse to abandon cooperation with other tribes. And I refuse to abandon the rest of humanity to the predation of parasitic elites.
Aristocracy cannot include everyone but it can serve everyone.
Aristocracy for everyone, if not of everyone.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-14 07:11:00 UTC
-
GHANA AND NIGERIA PRODUCING ABOVE UK AVERAGE IQ’S —“As the table above shows,
GHANA AND NIGERIA PRODUCING ABOVE UK AVERAGE IQ’S
—“As the table above shows, some African nationalities, particularly Ghanaians and Nigerians, score way above the England mean (and the white British mean)”—
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-13 22:58:00 UTC
-
GRID: TRUTH AND DECEIT, MASCULINE AND FEMININE, HOMOGENOUS AND HETEROGENEOUS. TE
GRID: TRUTH AND DECEIT, MASCULINE AND FEMININE, HOMOGENOUS AND HETEROGENEOUS.
TEXAS………..GERMAN…………BRITISH
…………………..JAPAN…………….FRENCH
……………………………………………LATIN
……………………………………………HINDU
…………………..CHINA…………………………..
ISLAM……….. RUSSIA……………JUDAISM
More later. Just capturing the idea while I”m thinking of it.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-13 15:58:00 UTC